Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T00:35:42.656Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Jürgen Moltmann as a Doctrinal Theologian: The Nature of Doctrine and The Possibilities for its Development

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 January 2009

Richard Clutterbuck
Affiliation:
Muswell Hill Methodist Church 49 Pages Lane Muswell Hill London N10 1QB

Extract

Moltmann derives much of the power of his theology from his willingness to endure the tensions of paradox, a willingness signalled early in his career with the title of his work, The Crucified God. Such paradoxes, however, leave unanswered questions and the need for further explorations. It is the argument of this article that an aspect of Moltmann's theology in particular need of exploration is the area of the status of Christian doctrine and its appropriate development. There is a major tension, we will suggest, between the disavowal of‘doctrine’, ‘dogma’, ‘tradition’ and ‘system’ as helpful concepts, and the strongly doctrinal and systematic content of Moltmann's theology. This tension, we believe, has something to do with the ambivalence in Moltmann's attitude to the intellectual legacy of the Enlightenment, to ‘modernity’. We shall try to show that Moltmann operates with a mixture of internal criteria (based on key doctrines) and external criteria (based on perceived human needs) for assessing authenticity in doctrine. Finally, within the dynamic of Moltmann's theology, with what we shall identify as its emphasis on historicality, there are resources for advancing an account of the theological significance of the development of doctrine. We explore these and ask why Moltmann himself has not put them to greater use.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Scottish Journal of Theology Ltd 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Theology of Hope, p. 301.

2 The Crucified God, chapters 7 and 8.

3 The Trinity and the Kingdom of God, p. 203.

4 On Human Dignity, chapter 2, ‘Christian Faith and Human Rights’.

5 The Crucified God, p. 255.

6 The Church in the Power of the Spirit, p. 225.

7 Theology of Hope, p. 299.

8 Theology of Hope, p. 300.

9 The Crucified God, p. 28.

10 The Crucified God, pp. 227–235.

11 The Crucified God, p. 246.

12 The Church in the Power of the Spirit, p. 333.

13 ‘The Confession of Jesus Christ. A Biblical and Theological Consideration’, An Ecumenical Confession of Faith, ed. Küng, and Moltmann, , New York, 1979, p. 14.Google Scholar

14 God in Creadon, pp. 124–139.

15 The Church in the Power of the Spirit, p. 67.

16 The Trinity and the Kingdom of God, p. 246.

17 The Trinity and the Kingdom of God, p. 19.

18 The Trinity and the Kingdom of God, p. 190.

19 Christian, William, Doctriiies of Religious Communities, New Haven, 1987.Google Scholar