Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-b6zl4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-24T10:04:17.020Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Biobricks and Crocheted Coral: Dispatches from the Life Sciences in the Age of Fabrication

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 February 2013

Sophia Roosth
Sophia Roosth*
Affiliation:
Harvard University E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Argument

What does “life” become at a moment when biological inquiry proceeds by manufacturing biological artifacts and systems? In this article, I juxtapose two radically different communities, synthetic biologists and Hyperbolic Crochet Coral Reef crafters (HCCR). Synthetic biology is a decade-old research initiative that seeks to merge biology with engineering and experimental research with manufacture. The HCCR is a distributed venture of three thousand craftspeople who cooperatively fabricate a series of yarn and plastic coral reefs to draw attention to the menace climate change poses to the Great Barrier and other reefs. Interpreting these two groups alongside one another, I suggest that for both, manufacturing biological artifacts advances their understandings of biology: in a rhetorical loop, they build new biological things in order to understand the things they are making. The resulting fabrications condense scientific and folk theories about “life” and also undo “life” as a coherent analytic object.

Type
Research Article
Information
Science in Context , Volume 26 , Issue 1 , March 2013 , pp. 153 - 171
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Reference List

Andrianantoandro, Ernesto, Basu, Subhayu, Karig, David K., and Weiss, Ron. 2006. “Synthetic Biology: New Engineering Rules for an Emerging Discipline.” Molecular Systems Biology 2:1–14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Asaro, Peter. 2007. “Heinz von Foerster and the Bio-Computing Movements of the 1960s.” In An Unfinished Revolution? Heinz von Foerster and the Biological Computer Laboratory, 1958–1976, edited by Müller, Albert and Müller, Karl H.. Vienna: Edition Echoraum.Google Scholar
Bernauer, Hubert. 2005. SYNBIOLOGY: An Analysis of Synthetic Biology Research in Europe and North America. Literature and Statistical Review. European Commission Framework Programme (FP6). Final report by NEST (New and Emerging Science and Technology): FP6-2003-NESTB4 Project 015357 - SYNBIOLOGY.Google Scholar
Bhutkar, Arjun. 2005. “Synthetic Biology: Navigating the Challenges Ahead.” Journal of Biolaw & Business 8 (2):19–29.Google ScholarPubMed
Church, George M. 2005. “Let Us Go Forth and Safely Multiply.” Nature 438 (7067):423.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cooper, Melinda. 2008. Life as Surplus: Biotechnology and Capitalism in the Neoliberal Era. Seattle: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
Creager, Angela. 2002. The Life of a Virus: Tobacco Mosaic Virus as an Experimental Model, 1930–1965. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Daston, Lorraine, and Galison, Peter. 2007. Objectivity. New York: Zone Books.Google Scholar
Davis-Floyd, Robbie, and Dumit, Joseph, eds. 1998. Cyborg Babies: From Techno-Sex to Techno-Tots. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Doyle, Richard. 1997. On Beyond Living: Rhetorical Transformations of the Life Sciences. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Duster, Troy. 2003. Backdoor to Eugenics. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Dyson, Freeman. 2007. “Our Biotech Future.” New York Review of Books 54 (12):24–29.Google Scholar
Forster, Anthony C., and Church, George M.. 2007. “Synthetic Biology Projects In Vitro.” Genome Research 17 (1):1–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fortun, Michael. 2008. Promising Genomics: Iceland and deCODE Genetics in a World of Speculation. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1971. The Order of Things: An Archaeology of the Human Sciences. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
Franklin, Sarah. 1997. Embodied Progress: A Cultural Account of Assisted Conception. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Franklin, Sarah. 2007. Dolly Mixtures: The Remaking of Genealogy. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Franklin, Sarah, and Ragoné, Helena, eds. 1998. Reproducing Reproduction: Kinship, Power, and Technological Innovation. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Gibson, Daniel, Benders, Gwyneddet al. 2008. “Complete Chemical Synthesis, Assembly, and Cloning of a Mycoplasma Genitalium Genome.” Science 319 (5867):1215–1220.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ginsburg, Faye, and Rapp, Rayna, eds. 1995. Conceiving the New World Order: The Global Politics of Reproduction. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Goodman, Alan, Heath, Deborah, and Lindee, M. Susan, eds. 2003. Genetic Nature/Culture: Anthropology and Science Beyond the Two-Culture Divide. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Haraway, Donna J. 1997. Modest_Witness@Second_Millennium.FemaleMan_Meets_OncoMouse: Feminism and Technoscience. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Haraway, Donna J. 2003. The Companion Species Manifesto: Dogs, People, and Significant Otherness. Chicago: Prickly Paradigm.Google Scholar
Hartouni, Valerie. 1997. Cultural Conceptions: On Reproductive Technologies and the Remaking of Life. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Hayden, Cori. 2003. When Nature Goes Public: The Making and Unmaking of Bioprospecting in Mexico. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Helmreich, Stefan. 1998. Silicon Second Nature: Culturing Artificial Life in a Digital World. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Helmreich, Stefan. 2010. “How Like a Reef: Figuring Coral, 1839–2010.” In Party Writing for Donna Haraway, a Webfestschrift, edited by King, Katie (commissioned by Sharon Ghamari-Tabrizi), http://reefhelmreich.blogspot.com/ (last accessed October 12, 2012).Google Scholar
Jacob, François. 1993. The Logic of Life: A History of Heredity. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Kay, Lily. 2000. Who Wrote the Book of Life? A History of the Genetic Code. Stanford: Stanford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keller, Evelyn Fox. 1995. Refiguring Life: Metaphors of Twentieth-Century Biology. New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keller, Evelyn Fox. 2000. The Century of the Gene. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keller, Evelyn Fox. 2008. “Organisms, Machines, and Thunderstorms: A History of Self-Organization, Part One.” Historical Studies in the Natural Sciences 38 (1):45–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keller, Evelyn Fox. 2009. “What Does Synthetic Biology Have to Do with Biology?” BioSocieties 4 (2):291–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelty, Christopher, and Landecker, Hannah. 2004. “A Theory of Animation: Cells, L-systems, and Film.” Grey Room 17:30–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelty, Christopher. 2008. Two Bits: The Cultural Significance of Free Software. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Kohler, Robert. 1994. Lords of the Fly: Drosophila Genetics and the Experimental Life. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Landecker, Hannah. 2007. Culturing Life: How Cells Became Technologies. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laubichler, Manfred. 2000. “The Organism is Dead. Long Live the Organism!” Perspectives on Science 8 (3):286–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lentzos, Filippa. 2009. “Synthetic Biology in the Social Context: The UK Debate to Date.” BioSocieties 4 (2):303–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mackenzie, Adrian. 2010. “Design in Synthetic Biology.” BioSocieties 5 (2):180–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Malley, Maureen A. 2009. “Making Knowledge in Synthetic Biology: Design Meets Kludge.” Biological Theory 4 (4):378–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pickering, Andrew. 2010. The Cybernetic Brain: Sketches of Another Future. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pottage, Alain. 2006. “Too Much Ownership: Bio-prospecting in the Age of Synthetic Biology.” BioSocieties 1 (2):137–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Purnick, Priscilla E.M., and Weiss, Ron. 2009. “The Second Wave of Synthetic Biology: From Modules to Systems.” Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology 10 (6):410–422.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rabinow, Paul. 1999. French DNA: Trouble in Purgatory. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rabinow, Paul. 2006. The Biological Modern. Concept Note. Anthropology of the Contemporary Research Collaboratory, February 2. http://anthropos-lab.net/documents/concept_labor/the-biological-modern (last accessed October 12, 2012).Google Scholar
Rabinow, Paul. 2009. “Biopower, Dignity, and Synthetic Anthropos.” National Humanities Center's On The Human Forum. 8 June. http://onthehuman.org/2009/06/biopower-dignity-synthetic-anthropos/ (last accessed October 12, 2012).Google Scholar
Rabinow, Paul, and Bennett, Gaymon. 2008. “From Bioethics to Human Practices, or Assembling Contemporary Equipment.” In Tactical Biopolitics: Art, Activism, and Technoscience, edited by Costa, Beatriz da, 389–400. Cambridge MA: MIT Press/Leonardo Books.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rader, Karen. 2004. Making Mice: Standardizing Animals for American Biomedical Research, 1900–1955. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reardon, Jenny. 2004. Race to the Finish: Identity and Governance in an Age of Genomics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Ro, Dae-Kyunet al. 2006. “Production of the Antimalarial Drug Precursor Artemisinic Acid in Engineered Yeast.” Nature 440 (7086):940–943.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roosth, Sophia. 2010. “Crafting Life: A Sensory Ethnography of Fabricated Biologies.” Ph.D. diss., Cambridge MA: MIT.Google Scholar
Rose, Nikolas. 2007. The Politics of Life Itself. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shapin, Steven. 1988. “The House of Experiment in Seventeenth-Century England.” Isis 79 (3):373–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stevens, Hallam. 2010. “Life Out of Sequence: An Ethnographic Account of Bioinformatics from the ARPANET to Post-Genomics.” Ph.D. diss., Cambridge MA: Harvard University.Google Scholar
Strathern, Marilyn. 1992a. After Nature: English Kinship in the Late Twentieth Century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Strathern, Marilyn. 1992b. Reproducing the Future: Essays on Anthropology, Kinship, and the New Reproductive Technologies. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Sunder Rajan, Kaushik. 2006. Biocapital: The Constitution of Postgenomic Life. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Taylor, Peter, Halfon, Saul, and Edwards, Paul, eds. 1997. Changing Life: Genomes, Ecologies, Bodies, Commodities. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Thacker, Eugene. 2004. Biomedia. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Thacker, Eugene. 2005. The Global Genome: Biotechnology, Politics, and Culture. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Thompson, Charis. 2005. Making Parents: The Ontological Choreography of Reproductive Technologies. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Thompson, Edward Palmer 1971. “The Moral Economy of the English Crowd in the Eighteenth Century.” Past & Present 50:76–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Varela, Francisco, Maturana, Humberto, and Uribe, Ricardo. 1974. “Autopoiesis: The Organization of Living Systems, Its Characterization and a Model.” BioSystems 5:187–196.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wade, Nicholas. 2010. “Synthetic Bacterial Genome Takes Over a Cell, Researchers Report.” New York Times May 21:17.Google Scholar