Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T12:32:16.911Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

At the ends of the line: How the Airy Transit Circle was gradually overshadowed by the Greenwich Prime Meridian

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 November 2022

Daniel Belteki
Daniel Belteki*
Affiliation:
ROG350 Sackler Research Fellow, Royal Museums Greenwich
*
Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Argument

The Greenwich Prime Meridian is one of the iconic features of the Royal Museums Greenwich. Visitors to the Museum even queue up to pose with one leg on either side of the Line. Yet, the Airy Transit Circle, the instrument that defined the meridian, is almost always excluded from these photographs. This paper examines how the instrument has become hidden in plain sight within the stories of Greenwich Time and Greenwich Meridian, as well as within the public imagination, by providing an analysis of the instrument’s transformation from a working astronomical instrument to a museum object. The paper highlights the gradual decoupling of the instrument from narratives of Time and Longitude, which resulted in the Line’s popularity overshadowing the instrument that defined it. By doing so, the paper aims at showing the symbiotic relationship between the materiality of the instrument and the meridian line that it defined. Approaching the instrument through the lenses of object biographies, the paper raises the question of whether the life of the instrument came to an end once operations with it were terminated. The analysis of the Transit Circle’s life reveals that it reached its end multiple times, which shifts the emphasis away from a single and ultimate end of scientific objects to a process of gradual downfall, during which they can “end” several times. In addition, through the object biography approach, the Transit Circle no longer appears as a dead object reaching an afterlife within a museum setting. Instead, the approach demonstrates that, though the instrument can still be restored to an operational order, doubts about its accuracy, and its relevancy to today’s astronomical methods, have led the instrument to be considered obsolete, transforming it into a museum object on display.

Keywords

History of astronomyobservatoriesscientific instrumentsRoyal Observatory Greenwichobject biographiesPrime Meridian
Type
Research Article
Information
Science in Context , Volume 34 , Issue 2: The Death of Scientific Objects , June 2021 , pp. 249 - 264
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Airy, George Biddell. 1854. Astronomical and Magnetical and Meteorological Observations made at the Royal Observatory, Greenwich, in the year 1852. London: George Edward Eyre and William Spottiswoode.Google Scholar
Airy, George Biddell. 1865. Astronomical and Magnetical and Meteorological Observations made at the Royal Observatory, Greenwich, in the year 1863. London: George Edward Eyre and William Spottiswoode.Google Scholar
Alberti, Samuel J. M. M. 2005. “Objects and the Museum.” Isis 96 (4): 559–571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alberti, Samuel J. M. M. ed. 2011. The Afterlives of Animals: A Museum Menagerie. Charlottesville and London: University of Virginia Press.Google Scholar
Anon. 1969. The Old Royal Observatory: A Brief Guide. London: National Maritime Museum.Google Scholar
Appadurai, Arjun, ed. 1986. The Social Life of Things: Commodities in Cultural Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, Alexi. 2012. “‘Precision,’ ‘Perfection,’ and the Reality of British Scientific Instruments on the Move during the 18th Century.” Material Culture Review/ Revue de la culture materielle 74: 14–29.Google Scholar
Belteki, Daniel. 2017. “Caring for the Circle: The Maintenance of the Airy Transit Circle 1851-1861. The Maintainers II Conference papers. Available at: https://themaintainers.org/s/Daniel-Belteki-Caring-for-the-Circle-The-Maintenance-of-the-Airy-Transit-Circle-1851-1861.pdf Google Scholar
Belteki, Daniel. 2019. Overseeing the Production of Space and Time: A History of the Airy Transit Circle. Doctoral dissertation, University of Kent.Google Scholar
Belteki, Daniel. 2020. “A Model Instrument: The Making and the Unmaking of a Model of the Airy Transit Circle.” Science Museum Group Journal 13 (Spring). http://dx.doi.org/10.15180/201305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonifacio, Vitor, Malaquias, Isabel and Fernandes, Joao. 2009. “The Troughton & Simms Transit Circle of Coimbra Astronomical Observatory from the 1850s: An Example of the Dissemination of Technological Developments.” Astronomische Nachrichten 333 (6): 544–551.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carpenter, James. 1866. “John Flamsteed and the Greenwich Observatory.” The Gentleman’s Magazine 220 (March): 378-386. Carr, Frank. 1965. Maritime Greenwich (Pride of Britain). London: Pitkin Guides.Google Scholar
Chapman, Allan. 1995. Dividing the Circle: The Development of Critical Angular Measurement in Astronomy 1500-1850. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Christie, William Henry Mahoney. 1907. Astronomical and Magnetical and Meteorological Observations made at the Royal Observatory, Greenwich, in the year 1905. Edinburgh: Neill & Co., Limited, Bellevue.Google Scholar
Dannehl, Karin. 2009. “Object Biographies: From Production to Consumption.” In History and Material Culture: A Student’s Guide to Approaching Alternative Sources, edited by Harvey, Karen, 123–138. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Daston, Lorraine . ed. 2004. Things that Talk: Object Lessons from Art and Science. New York: Zone Books.Google Scholar
Dunkin, Edwin. 1862. “The Royal Observatory, Greenwich: A Day at the Observatory.” The Leisure Hour 524 (9 January 1862): 22–26.Google Scholar
Dyson, Frank Watson. 1922. Astronomical and Magnetical and Meteorological Observations made at the Royal Observatory, Greenwich, in the year 1918. London: His Majesty’s Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Dyson, Frank Watson. 1932. Observations made at the Royal Observatory, Greenwich in the year 1930 in Astronomy, Magnetism and Meteorology. London: His Majesty’s Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Evans, Chris J. 2012. “Precision Engineering: An Evolutionary Perspective.” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A 370: 3835–3851.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gething, Phillip. 1954. “The Collimation Error of the Airy Transit Circle.” Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 114: 415–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenhill, Basil . ed. 1982. The National Maritime Museum. London: Philip Wilson Publishers Ltd. and Summerfield Press Ltd.Google Scholar
Herbig, George H. 1945. “Soviet Astronomy and World War II.” Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific 57 (337): 196–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herschel, John. 1849. Outlines of Astronomy. London: Longman, Brown, Green, Longmans, and John Taylor.Google Scholar
Higgitt, Rebekah F., and Dolan, Graham. 2010. “Greenwich, Time and ‘the Line’.” Endeavour 34 (1): 35–39.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Higgitt, Rebekah F., and Dunn, Richard. 2014. Finding Longitude: How Ships, Clocks and Stars helped solve the Longitude Problem. Glasgow: Collins.Google Scholar
Hoskin, Michael. 1989. “Astronomers at War: South v. Sheepshanks.” Journal for the History of Astronomy 20 (3): 175–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howse, Derek. 1970. “The Story of Greenwich Time.” Journal of the British Astronomical Association 80: 208–211.Google Scholar
Howse, Derek. 1980. Greenwich Time and the Discovery of Longitude. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ishibashi, Yuto. 2020. “Constructing the ‘Automatic’ Greenwich Time System: George Biddell Airy and the Telegraphic Distribution of Time, c.1852-1880.” British Journal for the History of Science 53 (1): 25–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, Myles. 2000. Spectrum of Belief: Joseph von Fraunhofer and the Craft of Precision Optics. Cambridge, MA; London: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kershaw, Michael. 2019. “Twentieth-Century Longitude: When Greenwich Moved.” Journal for the History of Astronomy 50 (2): 221–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kopytoff, Igor. 1986. “The Cultural Biography of Things: Commodization as Process.” In The Social Life of Things: Commodities in Cultural Perspective, edited by Appadurai, Arjun, 64–91. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lamy, Jerome, and Soulu, Frederic. 2015. “L’emergence contrariee du chronographe imprimant dans les observatoires francais (fin 19e – debut 20e s.).” Annals of Science 72: 75–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laurie, Philip S. 1960. The Royal Observatory. London: M. Harland & Son.Google Scholar
Lippincott, Kristen. 1994. The Story of Time and Space: The Old Royal Observatory at Greenwich, Past, Present and Future. Tonbridge: Addax Publishing.Google Scholar
Main, Robert. 1863. Practical and Spherical Astronomy. Cambridge: Deighton, Bell, and Co.Google Scholar
Malys, Stephen, Seago, John H., Pvlis, Nikolais K., Seidelmann, Kenneth P., and Kaplan, George H.. 2015. “Why the Greenwich Meridian Moved.” Journal of Geodesy 89 (12): 1263–1272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marth, Albert. 1860. “On the Polar Distances of the Greenwich Transit Circle.” Astronomische Nachrichten 53 (12): 177–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, E. G. 1949. “Transit Circles, Past and Present.” The Observatory 69: 140–142.Google Scholar
Maunder, Walter E. 1900. The Royal Observatory Greenwich: A Glance at Its History and Work. London: The Religious Tract Society.Google Scholar
Mikhailov. Aleksandr. 1955. “The Pulkovo Observatory.” The Observatory 75: 28–32.Google Scholar
Morus, Iwan Rhys. 2000. “‘The Nervous System of Britain’: Space, Time and the Electric Telegraph in the Victorian Age.” The British Journal for the History of Science 33 (4): 455–475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newcomb, Simon. 1903. The Reminiscences of an Astronomer. Boston and New York: Houghton, Mifflin and Company.Google Scholar
Pang, Alex Soojung-Kim. 2002. Empire and the Sun: Victorian Solar Eclipse Expeditions. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Pannakoek, Antoine. 1961. A History of Astronomy. London: George Allen & Unwin Ltd.Google Scholar
Ritchie, Tom. 2018. “Ventriloquised Voices: The Science Museum and the Hartree Differential Analyser.” Science Museum Group Journal 10 (Autumn). http://dx.doi.org/10.15180/181005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rooney, David and Nye, James. 2009. “‘Greenwich Observatory Time for the Public Benefit’: Standard Time and Victorian Networks of Regulation.” The British Journal for the History of Science 42 (1): 5–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Satterthwaite, Gilbert E. 2001. “Airy’s Transit Circle.” Journal of Astronomical History and Heritage 4: 115–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schaffer, Simon. 1988. “Astronomers Mark Time: Discipline and the Personal Equation.” Science in Context 2 (1): 115–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schaffer, Simon. 2011. “Easily Cracked: Scientific Instruments in States of Disrepair.” Isis 102 (4): 706–717.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smith, Robert W. 1991. “A National Observatory Transformed: Greenwich in the Nineteenth Century.” Journal for the History of Astronomy 22 (1): 5–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soderqvist, Thomas, and Bencard, Adam. 2010. “Do Things talk?” In The Exhibition as Product and Generator of Scholarship, edited by Lehmann-Brains, Susanne, Sichau, Christian , and Trischler, Helmut, 93–102. Max Planck Institute for the History of Science.Google Scholar
Spencer Jones, Harold. 1951. Observations made at the Royal Observatory, Greenwich in the year 1937 in Astronomy, Magnetism and Meteorology. London: His Majesty’s Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Spencer Jones, Harold. 1953. Observations made at the Royal Observatory, Greenwich in the year 1940 in Astronomy, Magnetism and Meteorology. London: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Spencer Jones, Harold. 1954. Observations made at the Royal Observatory, Greenwich in the year 1941 in Astronomy, Magnetism and Meteorology. London: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Stott, Carole. 1985. “The Greenwich Meridional Instruments: (Up to and Including the Airy Transit Circle).” Vistas in Astronomy 28 (1): 133–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taub, Liba. 2019. “What is a Scientific Instrument, Now?” Journal of the History of Collections 31 (3): 453–467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warner, Brian. 1979. Astronomers at the Royal Observatory Cape of Good Hope. Cape Town and Rotterdam: A. A. Balkema.Google Scholar
Warner, Deborah. 1990. “What Is a Scientific Instrument, When Did It Become One, and Why?” The British Journal for the History of Science 23 (1): 83–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Werrett, Simon. 2013. “Recycling in Early Modern Science.” The British Journal for the History of Science 46 (4): 627–646.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wise, Norton M., and Wise, Elaine M.. “Staging and Empire.” In Things that Talk: Object Lessons from Art and Science, edited by Daston, Lorraine, 101–146. Brooklyn, NY: Zone Books.Google Scholar
Withers, Charles W. J. 2017. Zero Degrees: Geographies of the Prime Meridian. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar