No CrossRef data available.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Oscar Wilde remarked in The Picture of Dorian Gray that, ‘It is only the shallow people who do not judge by appearances.’ Over three centuries of natural science show that, at least as far as the study of the natural world is concerned, Wilde's epigram is itself shallow. Weber used the term ‘disenchantment’ to mean the elimination of magic from the modern scientific world view: the intellectual rationalisation of the world embodied in modern science has made it impossible to believe in magic or an invisible God or gods, without a ‘sacrifice of the intellect’.
1 Hesiod, Theogony 116 in Kirk, G. S. and Raven, J. E., The PreSocratic Philosophers (Cambridge University Press, 1966), p. 24.Google Scholar
2 Galilei, Galileo, ‘Crew and de Salvio translation’, Dialogues and Mathematical Demonstrations Concerning Two New Sciences (New York, 1914), p. 40.Google Scholar
3 Nagel, T., The View from Nowhere (Oxford University Press, 1996)Google Scholar.
4 Russell, B., An Inquiry into Meaning and Truth (London: Allen & Unwin Ltd, 1948), p. 15Google Scholar.
5 Rene Descartes, Cottingham, John translation, Meditations on First Philosophy (Cambridge University Press, 1986)Google Scholar.
6 Rene Descartes, Principles, in Cottingham, J., A Descartes Dictionary, (Oxford: Blackwell, 1993), Part 1, art. 70, p. 36Google Scholar.
7 ibid., p. 13.
8 Ryle, G., Dilemmas (Cambridge University Press, 1964)Google Scholar.
9 ibid., 78–9.
10 Post, J. F., ‘On Reenchanting the World’, Research in Philosophy and Technology, 10, (1990), pp. 243–79Google Scholar.
11 Davidson, D., ‘Mental Events’ in Foster, I. and Swanson, J., Experience and Theory (Amhurst: University of Massachusetts Press, 1970), 79–01Google Scholar.
12 A good place to start is perhaps with the Spindel Conference: ‘The Concept of Supervenience in Contemporary Philosophy’, in Horgan, Terence, ed., The Southern Journal of Philosophy, 22, Supplement (1984)Google Scholar.
13 Geach, P. T., Truth, Love and Immortality (London: Hutchinson, 1979), pp. 113–14Google Scholar.
14 Davidson argues that events are particulars and says that event E is identical with event E just in case E and E have the same causes and the same effects. Critics have argued that this account of event identity is tacitly circular since the cause-effect relation is defined over event pairs. Davidson has responded by arguing that his account involves no formal circularity. Davidson's positive account is in Davidson, D., ‘Events as Particulars’, Nous, 4 (1970), pp. 25–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
15 Heil, J., ‘Supervenience Deconstructed’, European Journal of Philosophy, 6(2) (1998), pp. 146–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
16 McGinn, C., ‘Another Look at Color’, The Journal of Philosophy, 43(11) (November 1996), pp. 537–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
17 A crisp expression of this worry can be found in Goldstein, L., The Philosopher's Habitat (London: Routledge, 1990), pp. 185–86Google Scholar.
18 Sellars, W., ‘Philosophy and the Scientific Image of Man’, in Frontiers of Science and Philosophy (London: Allen & Unwin Ltd, 1964), p. 63Google Scholar.
19 Quinton, A., The Nature of Things (London: Routledge – Kegan Paul, 1973), p. 204Google Scholar.
20 Kripke, S., Naming and Necessity (Oxford: Basil Blackwell 1980)Google Scholar.
21 Scruton, R., Sexual Desire (London: George Weidenfeld, 1986), pp.180–212Google Scholar.
22 Wittgenstein, L., Philosophical Investigations (Oxford: Blackwell, 1953)Google Scholar.
23 See Hart, W. D., ‘The Anatomy of Thought’, Mind, 42, (1983), pp. 264–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar.