Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T11:31:51.420Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Conceptual Problems with Performance Enhancing Technology in Sport

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 August 2013

Emily Ryall
Emily Ryall*
Affiliation:
University of [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The majority of – usually moral – problems inherent in elite sport, such as whether athletes should be able to take particular drugs, wear particular clothing, or utilise particular tools, arguably stem from a conceptual one based on faulty logic and competing values. Sport is a human enterprise that represents a multitude of human compulsions, desires and needs; the urge to be competitive, to co-operate, to excel, to develop, to play, to love and be loved, and to find meaning in one's existence. From the perspective of an amateur athlete, this pluralism is possible. When one is involved in athletics at the lower echelons, the values that one holds in relation to sport are fluid and flexible; they are prioritised according to a myriad of other influences that are contingent to a particular situation. As such, the reasons that the general population participate in athletic activities and the values they consequently ascribe to it are complex and wide-ranging and thus fall into the sociological realm. The philosophical problem with value in sport is found at the highest level, the professional platform, where discordant values are espoused, particularly the value of ever increasing quantifiable performance. The athletic events at the Olympic Games are the archetypal manifestation of this Citius, Altius, Fortius (faster, higher, stronger) aphorism and yet when taken to its logical conclusion becomes evidently absurd.

Type
Papers
Information
Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplements , Volume 73: Philosophy and Sport , October 2013 , pp. 129 - 143
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Philosophy and the contributors 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Butryn, Ted, ‘Cyborg Horizons: Sport and the Ethics of Self-Technologization’ in Miah, A. & Eassom, S. (eds) Sport Technology: History, Philosophy and Policy. Research in Philosophy and Technology, 21, (Series Ed: Carl Mitcham) (Oxford: Elsevier Science Ltd, 2002)Google Scholar 117.

2 Haraway, Donna, ‘A Cyborg Manifesto: Science, Technology, and Socialist-Feminism in the Late Twentieth Century’ in Simians, Cyborgs and Women: The Reinvention of Nature. (New York: Routledge, 1991) 149–181Google Scholar.

3 Kurzweil, Raymond. The Singularity is Near (London: Penguin, 2006)Google Scholar

4 This is demonstrated by Bernard Suits (1978) in his conception of utopia which argues game-playing as the ideal of existence.

5 ‘technology’ in the Oxford Dictionary of English. Edited by Angus Stevenson. Oxford University Press, 2010. Oxford Reference Online. Oxford University Press. University of Gloucestershire. 10 July 2012 <http://www.oxfordreference.com/views/ENTRY.html?subview=Main&entry=t140.e0848700>

6 ‘technology’ in the Oxford Dictionary of Word Origins. by Julia Cresswell. Oxford Reference Online. Oxford University Press. University of Gloucestershire. 5 October 2010 <http://www.oxfordreference.com/views/ENTRY.html?subview=Main&entry=t292.e4936>

7 ‘technology’ in the Dictionary of the Social Sciences, Craig Calhoun, (ed.) Oxford University Press, 2002. Oxford Reference Online. Oxford University Press. University of Gloucestershire. 5 October 2010 <http://www.oxfordreference.com/views/ENTRY.html?subview=Main&entry=t104.e1667>

8 Heidegger actually calls the way we conceive and relate to the world ‘enframing’ but the term ‘technological attitude’ is a helpful indication of what this means. Heidegger, Martin, (trans. & intro. Lovitt, William). The Question Concerning Technology and Other Essays (New York: Harper Row, 1977)Google Scholar 12.

9 Heidegger, Martin, (translated by Gray, J.Glenn and Wieck, F.) What is Called Thinking? (New York: Harper and Row, 1968)Google Scholar 5.

10 Kaku, M., Physics of the Future: How science will shape human destiny and our daily lives by 2100. (New York: Doubleday, 2011)Google Scholar 22.

11 Kurzweil, Raymond. The Singularity is Near, (London: Penguin, 2006)Google Scholar 11.

12 Suits, Bernard, The Grasshopper: Games, Life and Utopia. (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1978)Google Scholar 41.

13 Sailors, Pam, ‘More than a pair of running shoes’ Journal of the Philosophy of Sport 36 (2009), 207–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

14 Robbins, Liz, A Race Like No Other: 26.2 Miles Through the Streets of New York. (New York: HarperCollins 2008) 140–141Google Scholar.

15 Nisbet, Robert, History of the Idea of Progress (New Jersey: Transaction, 1994)Google Scholar

16 Loland, Sigmund, ‘The Logic of Progress and the Art of Moderation in Competitive Sports’ in Values in Sport, Tannjo, C. and Tamburrini, C. (eds) (London: E & FN Spon, 2000)Google Scholar 42.

17 Op. cit. note xvi, 43–44.

18 This practice entails the blood being removed from the body to be reinserted at a later date once the body has replenished its lost blood cells. The effect is an increased number of red blood cells which then are able to hold an increased amount of oxygen.

19 Hakimi, P., Yang, J., Casadesus, G., G. et al. ‘Overexpression of the Cytosolic Form of Phosphoenolpyruvate Carboxykinase (GTP) in Skeletal Muscle Repatterns Energy Metabolism in the Mouse’, The Journal of Biological Chemistry, 282 (2007) 32844–32855CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed.

20 WADA Press Release. ‘Wada Conference Sheds Light On The Potential Of Gene Doping’ 1005 Lausanne, Switzerland, 20th March 2002.

21 The fears manifested in such language are explored more in Ryall, Emily ‘The language of genetic technology: metaphor and media representation’, Continuum, 22 (3) (2008). 363–373CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

22 IAAF ruling 144.2 It has since been further amended to ‘the use of any technology or appliance that provides the user with an advantage which he would not have obtained using the equipment specified in the Rules.’

23 Arbitration CAS 2008/A/1480 Pistorius v/ IAAF, award of 16 May 2008. 7. <www.jurisprudence.tas-cas.org/sites/CaseLaw/.../1480.pdf> July 2012.

24 Op. cit. note xxiii. 8

25 Jones, Carwyn and Wilson, Cassie ‘Defining advantage and athletic performance: The case of Oscar Pistorius’, European Journal of Sports Science 9(2) 2009. 125–131Google Scholar.

Jones, Carwyn ‘Oscar Pistorius, the Paralympics and issues of fair competition’ in Lampman, D. & Prettyman, S. Spickard (eds), Learning culture through sport (Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Education 2011)Google Scholar

26 Van Hilvoorde, I. and Landeweerd, L. ‘Disability or extraordinary talent: Francesco Lentini (three legs) versus Oscar Pistorius (no legs)’, Sport, Ethics and Philosophy, 2 (2008) 97–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

27 Edwards, S. D. ‘Should Oscar Pistorius be excluded from the 2008 Olympic Games?’ Sport, Ethics and Philosophy, 2 (2008) 112–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

28 Lenk, C., ‘Is enhancement in sport really unfair? Arguments on the concept of competition and equality of opportunities’ Sport, Ethics and Philosophy, 1 2007. 218–228CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

29 Crincoli, S. M., ‘You Can Only Race if You Can't Win? The Curious Cases of Oscar Pistorius & Caster Semenya’ Texas Review of Entertainment and Sports Law 12 (2) (2011) 133–188.Google Scholar

30 Whether the faster pitching action is a result of the surgery itself or attention to a reconditioning programme and other factors is disputed.

31 Suits maintained that sport was a sub-set of game-playing but with the additional criteria of physical skill and stability (to set it apart from ‘fads’ or ‘crazes’ such as hula-hoop).