Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T16:05:44.614Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Fichte and Schelling

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 January 2010

Roger Hausheer
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Intellectual historians have often remarked that German thought from its earliest beginnings is marked by two major features that distinguish it from the greater part of the remainder of Western European thought. These are, first, the tendency to seek some kind of participatory relationship with nature and the universe conceived in quasi-animistic terms, which represents a kind of reversion to a much older, much more primitive way of conceiving the world and man's place in it, and has led to all kinds of mysticism. It is a strain in the history of German thought which has been brought out very clearly by Lévy-Bruhl and others.

Type
Papers
Information
Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplements , Volume 44 , March 1999 , pp. 1 - 24
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Philosophy and the contributors 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Lévy-Bruhl, Lucien, L'Allemagne depuis Leibniz. 1890.Google Scholar

2 Heimann, Moritz, quoted by Friedell, Egon, Kulturgeschichte der Neuzeit, vol. I, p. 264.Google Scholar

3 Goethe, Dichtung und Wahrheit, book IIGoogle Scholar.

4 Hegel, , Geschichte der Philosophic, ed. Lasson, , p. 73Google Scholar.

5 Goethe, Dichtung und Wahrheit, book 10.

6 Fichte, , Werke, vol. II, p. 256.Google Scholar

7 Ibid., VI, P. 12

8 Ibid., VII, p. 274.

9 Ibid., XI, p. 423.

10 Ibid., VII, p. 574.

11 Ibid., VII, p. 576.

12 Ibid., VII, p. 578.

13 Schelling, Werke, IX, p. 361.

14 Ibid., II, p. 11.

15 Ibid., VIII, p. 84.

16 Ibid., XIII, p. 202.

17 Ibid., I, p. 443.

18 Ibid., II, p. 7.

19 Ibid., XII, p. 132.

20 Ibid., II, p. 11.

21 Ibid., I, p. 243.

22 Ibid., XI, p. 560ff.

23 Ibid., XII, p. 201.

24 Ibid., V, p. 116.

25 Ibid., VIII, p. 71.

26 Ibid., I, p. 353.

27 Ibid., XIII, p. 27.

28 Ibid., I, p. 293.

29 Ibid., IX, p. 356.

30 Ibid., IX, p. 358.

31 Ibid., VI, p. 26.

32 Ibid., I, p. 417.

33 Husserl, , Ideen zu einer reinen Phänomenologie, p. 37.Google Scholar

34 Sartre, , L'existentisalisme est un humanisme, pp. 21–2.Google Scholar

35 Ibid., p. 25.

36 Ibid., pp. 36–7.

37 Ibid., p. 22.

38 Bergson, , Introduction la métaphysique, p. 181.Google Scholar

39 Ibid., p. 196.

40 Bergson, , L'évolution creatrice, p. 129.Google Scholar

41 All these quotations are drawn from Hofer, Walther (ed.), Der Nationalsozialismus: Dokumente 1933–45.Google Scholar

42 Goebbels, , Michael, 1929.Google Scholar

43 Marx, , Economic and Philsophic Manuscripts of 1844, p. 145.Google Scholar

44 James, William, The Will to Believe, p. 15.Google Scholar