Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T05:43:44.340Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Stabilization of a Tractor with n Trailers in the Presence of Wheel Slip Effects

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 August 2020

Ali Keymasi Khalaji*
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Kharazmi University, Tehran, Iran E-mail: [email protected]
Mostafa Jalalnezhad
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Kharazmi University, Tehran, Iran E-mail: [email protected]
*
*Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected]

Summary

The purpose of this paper is to design a stabilizing controller for a car with n connected trailers. The proposed control algorithm is constructed on the Lyapunov theory. In this paper, the purpose of navigating the system toward the desired point considering the slip phenomenon as a main source of uncertainty is analyzed. First mathematical models are presented. Then, a stabilizing control approach based on the Lyapunov theory is presented. Subsequently, an uncertainty estimator is taken into account to overcome the wheel slip effects. Obtained results show the convergence properties of the proposed control algorithm against the slip phenomenon.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Keymasi Khalaji, A. and Zahedifar, R., “Lyapunov-based formation control of underwater robots,” ROBOTICA 38(6), 11051122 (2020).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tabataba’i-Nasab, F. S., Keymasi Khalaji, A. and Moosavian, S. A. A., “Adaptive nonlinear control of an autonomous underwater vehicle,” Trans. Inst. Meas. Control 41(11), 31213131 (2019).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keymasi Khalaji, A. and Tourajizadeh, H., “Nonlinear Lyapunov based control of an underwater vehicle in presence of uncertainties and obstacles,” Ocean Eng. 198(15), 106998 (2020).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sazgar, H., Azadi, S., Kazemi, R. and Keymasi Khalaji, A., “Integrated longitudinal and lateral guidance of vehicles in critical high speed manoeuvres,” Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part K J. Multi-body Dyn. 233(4), 9941013 (2019).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keymasi Khalaji, A., “Modeling and control of uncertain multibody wheeled robots,” Multibody Syst. Dyn. 46(3), 257279 (2019).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keymasi Khalaji, A., “PID-based target tracking control of a tractor-trailer mobile robot,” Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part C J. Mech. Eng. Sci. 233(13), 47764787 (2019).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bokharaie, V. S., Mason, O. and Verwoerd, M., “D-stability and delay-independent stability of homogeneous cooperative systems,” IEEE Trans. Autom. Control 55(12), 28822885 (2010).Google Scholar
Bokharaie, V. S., Mason, O. and Wirth, F., “Stability and positivity of equilibria for subhomogeneous cooperative systems,” Nonlinear Anal. Theory Methods Appl. 74(17), 64166426 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kimura, S., Nakamura, H. and Yamashita, Y., “Control of two-wheeled mobile robot via homogeneous semiconcave control Lyapunov function” IFAC Proc. Vol. 46(23), 9297 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kimura, S. and Nakamura, H., “Control of Two-Wheeled Mobile Robot via Homogeneous Semiconcave Control Lyapunov Function: Verification by Experimental Results,” Proceedings of the SICE Annual Conference (SICE) (IEEE, 2014) pp. 10631068.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shevitz, D. and Paden, B., “Lyapunov stability theory of nonsmooth systems,” IEEE Trans. Autom. Control 39(9), 19101914 (1994).Google Scholar
Khalil, H. K., Nonlinear Systems (Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, 2002).Google Scholar
Kouhi, Y. and Bajcinca, N., “Nonsmooth control design for stabilizing switched linear systems by left eigenstructure assignment,” IFAC Proc. Vol. 44(1), 380385 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Srinivasan, V. and Sukavanam, N., “Asymptotic stability and stabilizability of nonlinear systems with delay,” ISA Trans. 65, 1926 (2016).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kassaeiyan, P., Tarvirdizadeh, B. and Alipour, K., “Control of tractor-trailer wheeled robots considering self-collision effect and actuator saturation limitations,” Mech. Syst. Sig. Proc. 127, 388411 (2019).Google Scholar
Keymasi Khalaji, A. and Moosavian, S. A. A., “Switching control of a tractor-trailer wheeled robot,” Int. J. Robot. Autom. 30(2) (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keymasi Khalaji, A. and Moosavian, S. A. A., “Stabilization of a tractor-trailer wheeled robot,” J. Mech. Sci. Tech. 30(1), 421428 (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Canudas, C., “Exponential stabilization of mobile robots with nonholonomic constraints,” IEEE Trans. Autom. Control 13(11), 17911797 (1992).Google Scholar
Bloch, A. and Drakunov, S., “Stabilization and tracking in the nonholonomic integrator via sliding modes,” Syst. Control Lett. 29(2), 9199 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jiang, Z.-P., Lefeber, E. and Nijmeijer, H., “Stabilization and Tracking of a Nonholonomic Mobile Robot with Saturating Actuators,” Proceedings of CONTROLO’98, 3rd Portuguese Conference on Automatic Control (1998) pp. 315320.Google Scholar
Zulli, R., Fierro, R., Conte, G. and Lewis, F., “Motion Planning and Control for Non-holonomic Mobile Robots,” Proceedings of the 1995 IEEE International Symposium on Intelligent Control, 1995 (IEEE, 1995) pp. 551557.Google Scholar
DeSantis, R. M., “Path-tracking for a tractor-trailer-like robot: Communication,” Int. J. Robot. Res. 13(6), 533544 (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brockett, R., “Control Theory and Singular Riemannian Geometry,In: New Directions in Applied Mathematics (Hilton, P. J. and Young, G. S., eds.), (Springer, New York, NY, 1982) pp. 1127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miranda, F., “Numerical methods of stabilizer construction via guidance control,” Math. Methods Appl. Sci. 35(14), 16701680 (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bloch, A. M., Reyhanoglu, M. and McClamroch, N. H., “Control and stabilization of nonholonomic dynamic systems,” IEEE Trans. Autom. Control 37(11), 17461757 (1992).Google Scholar
Brockett, R. W., “Asymptotic Stability and Feedback Stabilization,In: Differential Geometric Control Theory (Birkhauser, Boston, 1983) pp. 181191.Google Scholar
Yueming, H., Ge, S. S. and Chun-Yi, S., “Stabilization of uncertain nonholonomic systems via time-varying sliding mode control,” IEEE Trans. Autom. Control 49(5), 757763 (2004).Google Scholar
Sankaranarayanan, V., Mahindrakar, A. D. and Banavar, R. N., “A switched controller for an underactuated underwater vehicleCommun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul. 13(10), 22662278 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Widyotriatmo, A., Hong, K.-S. and Prayudhi, L., “Robust stabilization of a wheeled vehicle: Hybrid feedback control design and experimental validation,” J. Mech. Sci. Tech. 24(2), 513520 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keymasi Khalaji, A. and Jalalnezhad, M., “Control of a tractor-trailer robot subjected to wheel slip,” Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part K J. Multi-body Dyn. 233(4), 956967 (2019).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alipour, K., Robat, A. B. and Tarvirdizadeh, B., “Dynamics modeling and sliding mode control of tractor-trailer wheeled mobile robots subject to wheels slip,” Mech. Mach. Theory 138, 1637 (2019).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kassaeiyan, P., Alipour, K. and Tarvirdizadeh, B., “A full-state trajectory tracking controller for tractor-trailer wheeled mobile robots,” Mech. Mach. Theory 150, 103872 (2020).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slotine, J. J. and Li, W., Applied Nonlinear Control (Prentice-Hall International, Washington, DC, USA, 1991).Google Scholar
Tanner, H. G. and Kyriakopoulos, K. J., “Discontinuous Backstepping for Stabilization of Nonholonomic Mobile Robots,International Conference on Robotics and Automation (IEEE, 2002) pp. 39483953.Google Scholar