Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-08T21:38:21.372Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Dynamics and Control of a Novel Microrobot with High Maneuverability

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2021

Alireza Esfandbod
Affiliation:
Nano Robotics Laboratory, Mechanical Engineering Department, Sharif University of Technology, Tehran, P.O. Box: 11155-9567, Iran E-mails: [email protected], [email protected]
Hossein Nejat Pishkenari*
Affiliation:
Nano Robotics Laboratory, Mechanical Engineering Department, Sharif University of Technology, Tehran, P.O. Box: 11155-9567, Iran E-mails: [email protected], [email protected]
Ali Meghdari
Affiliation:
Nano Robotics Laboratory, Mechanical Engineering Department, Sharif University of Technology, Tehran, P.O. Box: 11155-9567, Iran E-mails: [email protected], [email protected]
*
*Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected]

Summary

In this study, we introduce a novel three-dimensional micro-scale robot capable of swimming in low Reynolds number. The proposed robot consists of three rotating disks linked via three perpendicular adjustable rods, actuated by three rotary and three linear motors, respectively. The robot mechanism has an important property which makes it superior to the previously designed micro swimmers. In fact, our goal is designing a micro swimmer which its controllability matrix has full rank and hence it will be capable to perform any desired maneuver in space. After introducing the mechanism and derivation of the dynamical equations of motion, we propose a control method to steer the robot to the desired position and orientation in the presence of external disturbances in the low Reynolds number flow. Simulation results confirm the successful performance of the proposed mechanism and employed control method demonstrating high maneuverability of microrobot.

Type
Article
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Gao, J., Yan, G., He, S., Xu, F. and Wang, Z., “Design, analysis, and testing of a motor-driven capsule robot based on a sliding clamper,” Robotica 35(3), 521536 (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kortschack, A., Shirinov, A., Trüper, T. and Fatikow, S., “Development of mobile versatile nano handling microrobots: Design, driving principles, haptic control,” Robotica 23(4), 419434 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guo, J., Guo, S., Wei, X. and Gao, Q., “A Novel tele-operation controller for wireless microrobots in-pipe with hybrid motion,” Robot. Auto. Syst. 76(1), 6879 (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibbs, J. and Zhao, Y., “Catalytic nanomotors: Fabrication, mechanism, and applications,” Front. Mater. Sci. 5(1), 2539 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, Z., Chen, J. and Feng, J., “Design of an omni-directional mobile microrobot (OMMR-I) for a micro-factory with 2 mm electromagnetic micromotors,” Robotica 23(1), 4549 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, J., Li, Z. and Chen, J., “A microstep control approach for a millimeter-sized omni-directional mobile microrobot actuated by 3-mm-electromagnetic micromotors,” Robotica 27(6), 813824 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fischer, P. and Ghosh, A., “Magnetically actuated propulsion at low Reynolds numbers: Towards nanoscale control,” Nanoscale 3(2), 557563 (2011).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Saadabad, N. A., Moradi, H. and Vossoughi, G., “Dynamic modeling, optimized design, and fabrication of a 2DOF piezo-actuated stick-slip mobile microrobot,” Mech. Mach. Theory 133(1), 514530 (2019).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Libersa, C., Arsicault, M., Gazeau, J. P. and Lallemand, J. P., “A peculiar flip-flop actuator for an in-pipe microrobot,” Robotica 22(5), 547561 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Metzger, N. K., Mazilu, M., Kelemen, L., Ormos, P. and Dholakia, K., “Observation and simulation of an optically driven micromotor,” J. Opt. 13(4), 044018 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abbott, J. J., Nagy, Z., Beyeler, F. and Nelson, B. J., “Robotics in the small, part I: Microbotics,” IEEE Robot. Autom. Mag. 14(2), 92103 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brunete, A., Hernando, M., Gambao, E. and Torres, J. E., “A behaviour-based control architecture for heterogeneous modular, multi-configurable, chained micro-robots,” Robot. Auto. Syst. 60(12), 16071624 (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chowdhury, S., Jing, W. and Cappelleri, D. J., “Controlling multiple microrobots: Recent progress and future challenges,” J. Micro-Bio Robot. 10(1–4), 111 (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Purcell, E. M., “Life at low Reynolds number,” Am. J. Phys. 45(1), 311 (1977).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Becker, L. E., Koehler, S. A. and Stone, H. A., “On self-propulsion of micro-machines at low Reynolds number: Purcell’s three-link swimmer,” J. Fluid Mech. 490, 1535 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Najafi, A. and Golestanian, R., “Simple swimmer at low Reynolds number: Three linked spheres,” Phys. Rev. E 69(6), 062901 (2004).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Golestanian, R. and Ajdari, A., “Analytic results for the three-sphere swimmer at low Reynolds number,” Phys. Rev. E 77(3), 036308 (2008).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Alexander, G. P., Pooley, C. M. and Yeomans, J. M., “Hydrodynamics of linked sphere model swimmers,” J. Phys. Condens. Matter 21(20), 204108 (2009).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Alouges, F., DeSimone, A. and Lefebvre, A., “Optimal strokes for low Reynolds number swimmers: An example,” J. Nonlinear Sci. 18(3), 277302 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Avron, J. E., Kenneth, O. and Oaknin, D. H., “Pushmepullyou: An efficient micro-swimmer,” New J. Phys. 7(1), 234 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Golestanian, R., “Three-sphere low-Reynolds-number swimmer with a cargo container,” Eur. Phys. J. E 25(1), 14 (2008).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ledesma-Aguilar, R., Löwen, H. and Yeomans, J. M., “A circle swimmer at low Reynolds number,” Eur. Phys. J. E 35(8), 70 (2012).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Alouges, F., DeSimone, A., Giraldi, L. and Zoppello, M., “Self-propulsion of slender micro-swimmers by curvature control: N-link swimmers,” Int. J. Non-Linear Mech. 56(1), 132141 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shapere, A. and Wilczek, F., “Geometry of self-propulsion at low Reynolds number,” J. Fluid Mech. 198(1), 557585 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Avron, J. E., Gat, O. and Kenneth, O., “Optimal swimming at low Reynolds numbers,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 93(18), 186001 (2004).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Setter, E., Bucher, I. and Haber, S., “Low-Reynolds-number swimmer utilizing surface traveling waves: Analytical and experimental study,” Phys. Rev. E 85(6), 066304 (2012).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jalali, M. A., Alam, M. R. and Mousavi, S. H., “Versatile low-Reynolds-number swimmer with three-dimensional maneuverability,” Phys. Rev. E 90(5), 053006 (2014).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Happel, J. and Brenner, H., Low Reynolds Number Hydrodynamics: with Special Applications to Particulate Media, vol. 1 (Springer Netherlands, Springer Science & Business Media, 2012).Google Scholar
Jalali, M. A., Khoshnood, A. and Alam, M. R., “Microswimmer-induced chaotic mixing,” J. Fluid Mech. 779(1), 669683 (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar