Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-08T19:29:00.976Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A comparative study of two model-based control techniques for the industrial manipulator

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 October 2016

Ahmet Dumlu ,
Köksal Erentürk ,
Alirıza Kaleli  and
Kağan Koray Ayten
Ahmet Dumlu*
Affiliation:
Department of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, College of Engineering, Ataturk University, 25240 Erzurum, Turkey. E-mails: [email protected], [email protected]
Köksal Erentürk
Affiliation:
Department of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, College of Engineering, Ataturk University, 25240 Erzurum, Turkey. E-mails: [email protected], [email protected]
Alirıza Kaleli
Affiliation:
Department of Mechatronics Engineering, College of Engineering, Ataturk University, 25240 Erzurum, Turkey. E-mail: [email protected]
Kağan Koray Ayten
Affiliation:
Department of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, College of Engineering, Ataturk University, 25240 Erzurum, Turkey. E-mails: [email protected], [email protected]
*
*Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

In this paper, design, analysis and real-time trajectory tracking control of a 6-degree of freedom revolute spherical-spherical type parallel manipulator, actuated by six hybrid stepper motors, has been studied. Two different control approaches have been used to improve the trajectory tracking performance of the designed manipulator. The first approach considered a single input-single output (SISO) linear quadratic regulator (LQR) for trajectory tracking control of the manipulator. Another controller type based on a nonlinear sliding mode controller method has been utilized to take decoupled dynamic approximation model of the manipulator into account and to improve tracking performance of the manipulator. Real-time experimental results for the two different control techniques have been verified. Finally, according to the results, the nonlinear sliding mode controller method has improved the tracking performance of the designed manipulator.

Keywords

Parallel manipulatorkinematics analysisdynamics analysishybrid stepper motorlinear quadratic optimal regulator controlsliding mode control
Type
Articles
Information
Robotica , Volume 35 , Issue 10 , October 2017 , pp. 2036 - 2055
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Merlet, J. P., Parallel Robots (Springer, New York, 2006).Google Scholar
2. Dai, J. S., Huang, Z. and Lipkin, H., “Mobility of over constrained parallel mechanisms,” J. Mech. Des. 128 (1), 220–229 (2006).Google Scholar
3. Stewart, D., “A platform with six degrees of freedom,” Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. 180 (1), 371–386 (1965).Google Scholar
4. Yangmin, L. and Qingsong, X., “Design and development of a medical parallel robot for cardiopulmonary resuscitation,” IEEE/ASME Trans. Mechatronics 12 (3), 265–273 (2007).Google Scholar
5. Shoham, M., Burman, M., Zehavi, E., Joskowicz, L., Batkilin, E. and Kunicher, Y., “Bone-mounted miniature robot for surgical procedures: Concept and clinical applications,” IEEE Trans. Robot. Autom. 19 (5), 893–901 (2003).Google Scholar
6. Xu, W. L., Pap, J. S. and Bronlund, J., “Design of a biologically inspired parallel robot for foods chewing,” IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. 55 (2), 832–841 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Ibrahim, K., Ramadan, A., Fanni, M., Kobayashi, Y., Abo-Ismail, A. and Fujie, M. G., “Development of a new 4-DOF endoscopic parallel manipulator based on screw theory for laparoscopic surgery,” Mechatronics 28, 4–7 (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Ottaviano, E. and Ceccarelli, M., “Application of a 3-DOF parallel manipulator for earthquake simulations,” IEEE/ASME Trans. Mechatronics 11 (2), 241–246 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Kok-Meng, L. and Arjunan, S., “A three-degrees-of-freedom micromotion in-parallel actuated manipulator,” IEEE Trans. Robot. Autom. 7 (5), 634–641 (1991).Google Scholar
10. Ramadan, A. A., Takubo, T., Mae, Y., Oohara, K. and Arai, T., “Developmental process of a chopstick-like hybrid-structure two-fingered micromanipulator hand for 3-D manipulation of microscopic objects,” IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. 56 (4), 1121–1135 (2009).Google Scholar
11. Berenguer, F. J. and Monasterio-Huelin, F. M., “Zappa, a quasi-passive biped walking robot with a tail: modeling, behavior, and kinematic estimation using accelerometers,” IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. 55 (9), 3281–3289 (2008).Google Scholar
12. Pierrot, F., Nabat, V., Company, O., Krut, S. and Poignet, P., “Optimal design of a 4-DOF parallel manipulator: from academia to industry,” IEEE Trans. Robot. 25 (2), 213–224 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13. Huang, T., Chetwynd, D. G., Mei, J. P. and Zhao, X. M., “Tolerance design of a 2-DOF over constrained translational parallel robot,” IEEE Trans. Robot. 22 (1), 167–172 (2006).Google Scholar
14. Chen, S.-H. and Fu, L.-C., “Observer-based backstepping control of a 6-dof parallel hydraulic manipulator,” Control Eng. Pract. 36 (0), 100–112 (2015).Google Scholar
15. Pi, Y. and Wang, X., “Trajectory tracking control of a 6-DOF hydraulic parallel robot manipulator with uncertain load disturbances,” Control Eng. Pract. 19 (2), 185–193 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16. Castillo-Castañeda, E. and Takeda, Y., “Improving path accuracy of a crank-type 6-dof parallel mechanism by stiction compensation,” Mech. Mach. Theory 43 (1), 104–114 (2008).Google Scholar
17. Xu, W. L., Torrance, J. D., Chen, B. Q., Potgieter, J., Bronlund, J. E. and Pap, J. S., “Kinematics and experiments of a life-sized masticatory robot for characterizing food texture,” IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. 55 (5), 2121–2132 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18. Dumlu, A. and Erenturk, K., “Modeling and trajectory tracking control of 6-DOF RSS type parallel manipulator,” Robotica 32 (04), 643–657 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19. Liu, X. J., Wang, J., Gau, F. and Wang, L. P., “Mechanism design of a simplified 6-DOF 6-RUS parallel manipulator,” Robotica 20 (01), 81–91 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20. Yang, Z., Wu, J. and Mei, J., “Motor-mechanism dynamic model based neural network optimized computed torque control of a high speed parallel manipulator,” Mechatronics 17 (7), 381–390 (2007).Google Scholar
21. Codourey, A. and Yoshikawa, T., “Dynamic Modelling and Mass Matrix Evaluation of the DELTA Parallel Robot for Axes Decoupling Control,” Proceedings of the IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, (1996) pp. 1211–1218.Google Scholar
22. Albagul, A. and Wahyu, D., “Dynamic Modeling and Adaptive Traction Control for Mobile Robots,” Proceedings of the Ind. Elec. Soc. 30th Annual of the IEEE/IECON, (2004) pp. 614–620.Google Scholar
23. Ting, Y., Li, C. C. and Nquyen, T. V., “Composite controller design for a 6DOF Stewart nanoscale platform,” Precis. Eng. 37 (03), 671–683 (2013).Google Scholar
24. Su, Y., Sun, D., Ren, L., and Mills, J. K., “Integration of saturated PI synchronous control and PD feedback for control of parallel manipulators,” IEEE Trans. Robot. 22 (1), 202–207 (2006).Google Scholar
25. Grewal, K. S., Dixon, D. and Pearson, J., “LQG controller design applied to a pneumatic stewart-gough platform,” Int. J. Autom. Comput. 9 (1), 45–53 (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
26. Davliakos, I. and Papadopoulos, E., “Model-based control of a 6-dof electrohydraulic Stewart-gough platform,” Mech. Mach. Theory 43 (11), 1385–1400 (2008).Google Scholar
27. Davliakos, I. and Papadopoulos, E., “Impedance model-based control for an electrohydraulic Stewart platform,” Eur. J. Control 5 (5), 560–577 (2009).Google Scholar
28. Meng, Q., Zhang, T., He, J., Song, J. and Chen, X., “Improved model-based control of a six-degree-of-freedom Stewart platform driven by permanent magnet synchronous motors,” Ind. Robot: An Int. J. 39 (1), 47–56 (2012).Google Scholar
29. Yang, C. F., Huang, Q. T., and Han, J. W., “Decoupling control for spatial six-degree-of-freedom electro-hydraulic parallel robot,” Robot. Comput.-Integr. Manuf. 28 (1), 14–23 (2012).Google Scholar
30. Lee, S. H., Song, J. B., Choi, W. C. and Hong, S., “Position control of a Stewart platform using inverse dynamics control with approximate dynamics,” Mechatronics 13 (6), 605–619 (2003).Google Scholar
31. Xu, Y., Liao, H., Liu, L. and Wang, Y., “Modeling and robust H-infinite control of a novel non-contact ultra-quiet Stewart spacecraft,” Acta Astronautica 107 (01), 274–289 (2015).Google Scholar
32. Zubizarreta, A., Marcos, M., Cabanes, I. and Pinto, C., “A procedure to evaluate extended computed torque control configurations in the Stewart–Gough platform,” Robot. Auton. Syst. 59 (10), 770–781 (2011).Google Scholar
33. Kizir, S. and Bingül, Z., “Fuzzy impedance and force control of a Stewart platform,” Turkish J. Electr. Eng. Comput. Sci. 22 (01), 924–939 (2014).Google Scholar
34. Guo, H., Liu, Y., Liu, G. and Li, H., “Cascade control of a hydraulically driven 6-DOF parallel robot manipulator based on a sliding mode,” Control Eng. Pract. 16 (9), 1055–1068 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
35. Sung-Hua, C. and Li-Chen, F., “Output feedback sliding mode control for a stewart platform with a nonlinear observer-based forward kinematics solution,” IEEE Trans. Control Systems Technology 21 (1), 176–185 (2013).Google Scholar
36. Qiang, M., Tao, Z., Xiang, G. and Jing-yan, S., “Adaptive sliding mode fault-tolerant control of the uncertain stewart platform based on offline multibody dynamics,” IEEE/ASME Trans. Mechatronics 19 (3), 882–894 (2014).Google Scholar
37. Kim, N.-I., Lee, C.-W. and Chang, P.-H., “Sliding mode control with perturbation estimation: Application to motion control of parallel manipulator,” Control Eng. Pract. 6 (11), 1321–1330 (1998).Google Scholar
38. Edwards, C. and Spurgeon, S., Sliding Mode Control: Theory and Applications (London: Taylor and Francis, 1998).Google Scholar
39. Utkin, V., “Variable structure systems with sliding modes,” IEEE Trans. Autom. Control 22 (2), 212–222 (1977).Google Scholar
40. Slotine, J. J. E. and Li, W., Applied Nonlinear Control (New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, 1991).Google Scholar
41. Bellini, A., Concari, C., Franceschini, G. and Toscani, A., “Mixed-mode PWM for high-performance stepping motors,” IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. 54 (6), 3167–3177 (2007).Google Scholar
42. Islam, S. and Liu, P. X., “Robust sliding mode control for robot manipulators,” IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. 58 (6), 2444–2453 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
43. Fateh, M. M. and Farhangfard, H., “On the transforming of control space by manipulator Jacobian,” Int. J. Control Autom. 6 (1), 101–108 (2008).Google Scholar