Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-02T23:25:24.046Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Rights, risks, and residual obligations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 October 2001

Sven Ove Hansson  and
Martin Peterson
Sven Ove Hansson
Affiliation:
Philosophy Unit, Royal Institute of Technology, SE-100 44 Stockholm, Sweden.
Martin Peterson
Affiliation:
Philosophy Unit, Royal Institute of Technology, SE-100 44 Stockholm, Sweden.
Get access

Abstract

The notion of residual obligations can be used as a tool to overcome, at least in part, the conflict between the individual's prima facie right not to be exposed to involuntary risks, and the rights of industries and other large organisations to carry out activities that are associated with risks. A typology of residual obligations is developed, and it is applied in a discussion of the moral obligations of those who impose risks on others. The major types are obligations to compensate, to communicate, to improve, to search for knowledge, and to have an appropriate attitude. It is argued that conscientious compliance with risk-related residual obligations is an essential component of what makes it morally acceptable to expose others to risk.

Type
Technical Article
Information
Risk, Decision and Policy , Volume 6 , Issue 3 , December 2001 , pp. 157 - 166
Copyright
© Risk, Decision and Policy, 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)