Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T19:41:18.477Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The West German Peace Movement and the Christian Churches: An Institutional Approach

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 August 2009

Alice Holmes Cooper
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Protestant participation in postwar West German peace movements has markedly outstripped Catholic participation, suggesting that age is not the only important cleavage separating participants and nonparticipants. It is argued that because churches interpret collective experience, they have helped shape individual attitudes and political protest across generations throughout the postwar period. In West Germany, church interpretations of fascism, World War Two, and postwar developments have offered interpretive frameworks and defined the parameters of defense issues for their members. In doing so, churches have provided or restricted ideological, as well as organizational, resources to peace protest within their midst. Similar processes are at work in institutions like parties and unions as well. Although younger generations have sometimes adopted more radical views than their elders, the interplay between generations has taken place in the context of a previous institutional framing of issues.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Review of Politics , Volume 50 , Issue 1 , Winter 1988 , pp. 71 - 98
Copyright
Copyright © University of Notre Dame 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Notes

* I would like to thank Peter Hall, Anthony Messina, and Samuel K. Cohen, Jr., for their criticisms of earlier drafts.

1. Inglehart, Ronald, The Silent Revolution, Changing Values and Political Styles Among Western Publics (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1977).Google Scholar

2. Rabier, Jacques-Rene, Riffault, Helene, and Inglehart, Ronald, Euro-barometer 17: Energy and the Future, April 1982Google Scholar (machine-readable data file), 1st ICPSR ed., Ann Arbor, Mich., Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research, 1983. Cross-tabulations of age classes and approval/disapproval variables. The ranges in the percentages given above result from combining two age cohorts in the case of the younger generations (15–24 and 25–34 year olds), and two age cohorts in the case of the generation which experienced World War II (45–54 and 55–64 year olds).

3. Meyer, Berthold, Der Bürger und seine Sicherheit: Zum Verhältnis von Sicherheits-streben und Sicherheitspolitik (Frankfurt: Campus Verlag, 1983), pp. 270–73.Google Scholar

4. Messina, Anthony, “Postwar Protest Movements in Britain: A Challenge to Parties,” Review of Politics 49, 3, (Summer 1987): 413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

5. Eurobarometer 17, using weighted age samples.

6. Messina, , “Postwar Protest Movements.”Google Scholar Scholarly consensus prevails that the young feel less threatened by the Soviet Union than the old, whether as a result of socialization during peacetime or not. Messina quite rightly points out that this does not necessarily lead to absence of feelings of threat altogether. On the contrary, the focus may shift to new sources of threat, in particular nuclear weapons.

7. For specific data on the differences in participation according to church affiliation (the only case to receive detailed attention in this article) see below.

8. Tarrow, Stanley, “The Creation of New Religious Movements: Cycles, Institutions, and the Transformation of Interpretive Frames,” unpublished manuscript, p. 5.Google Scholar

9. Nissen, Peter, “Prospects for a Realignment of the West German Party System: The Impact of Oppositional Movements and the ‘Green Party’”Google Scholar (Paper delivered at the conference entitled “When Parties Fail: Paths of Alternative Political Action,” Hutchins Center for the Study of Democratic Institutions, University of California at Santa Barbara, 19–20 May 1982). Nissen does not control for class, education, age, region, or urban/rural residence when reporting these differences between Protestants and Catholics. Indirect evidence for the independent effects of religious affiliation on peace movement activism is provided, however, by a breakdown of SPD voters by religion and class between 1961 and 1972. The “vote intention” of Protestant white-collar employees rose from 41.5% in 1961 to 70.1% in 1972, while that of Catholic white-collar employees rose from 18.9% in 1961 to 42.4% in 1972. While both Protestant and Catholic white-collar employees increased their vote for the SPD, Protestant SPD voters vastly outnumbered Catholic SPD voters throughout the period. (See Klingemann, Hans D. and Taylor, Charles Lewis, “Partisanship, Candidates and Issues: Attitudinal Components of the Vote in West German Federal Elections,” in Elections and Parties, ed. Klingemann, Hans D. and Taylor, Charles Lewis [Beverly Hills: Sage Publications, 1978], pp. 97–137, here p. 105.)Google Scholar This period spans the twelve years between the SPD's 1959 Godesberg Programm, which moderated the SPD's platform in an ultimately successful bid for middle-class vote, and the SPD's crowning electoral success of the postwar period in 1972. The 1972 election saw the height of the middle class's incorporation into the SPD under the auspices of Brandt's chancellorship. The most active opposition to the double-track decision in society at large, as well as within the SPD itself, came from this middle class element (particularly the youth of the “new” middle class), part of which ultimately broke rank with the SPD to swell the ranks of the Green party. Likewise, the activists of the 1950's peace protest came predominantly from the SPD.

10. Lemhöfer, Lutz, “Zögernder Aufbruch aus dem Kalten Krieg: die katholische Kirche und die bundesdeutsche ‘neue Friedensbewegung’” in Die neue Friedens-bewegung, ed. Steinweg, Reiner (Frankfurt: Suhrkamp Verlag, 1982), pp. 245–58.Google Scholar

11. To paraphrase Samuel Huntington's argument from his American Politics and the Promise of Disharmony (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1981)Google Scholar, early positions taken by the churches created or prevented the future development of an “ideals vs. institutions gap” to be used by protesters to justify their actions.

12. The Evangelische Kirche in Deutschland (EKD) is the official name of the postwar German Protestant church.

13. Beckmann, Joachim, ed., Kirchliches Jahrbuch für die Evangelische Kirche in Deutschland 1945–1948, 72–75 (Gütersloh: C. Bertelesmann Verlag, 1950): 185, 186.Google Scholar

14. Vogel, Johanna, Kirche und Wkderbewaffnung: Die Haltung der Evangelischen Kirche in Deutschland in den Auseinandersetzungen um die Wiederbewaffnung der Bundersrepublik 1949–56 (Göttingen: Vandenhoeck und Ruprecht, 1978), p. 70.Google Scholar

15. For the arguments of supporters and opponents of Adenauer's defense policy of the 1950's see Beckmann, Joachim, ed., Kirchliches Jahrbuch für die Evangelische Kirche in Deutschland 77–86 (Gutersloh: Gutersloher Verlagshaus Gerd Mohn, 1950–1960).Google Scholar

16. As the EKD Council stated, “Einer Remilitarizierung Deutschlands können wir das Wort nicht reden, weder was den Westen noch was den Osten anlangt.” See Kirchliches Jahrbuch (1950), pp. 165–66.Google Scholar

17. See Kirchliches Jahrbuch 91 (1965)Google Scholar for the text and reaction to the essay.

18. In an interview in January 1985.

19. A representative of the GHI imparted much of this information in an interview in August 1984.

20. Scharffenorth, Gerta, “Konflikte in der Evangelischen Kirche in Deutschland 1950 bis 1969 im Rahmen der historischen und ökumenischen Friedensdiskussion,” in Konflikte zwischen Wehrdienst und Friedensdiensten, ed. Duchrow, Ulrich and Scharffenorth, Gerta (Stuttgart: Ernst Klett Verlag, 1970), pp. 17–116, here pp. 40, 41.Google Scholar

21. Kubbig, Bernd, Kirche und Kriegsdienstverweigerung in der BRD (Stuttgart: Verlag W. Kohlhammer, 1974).Google Scholar

22. Wiedenmann, Wolfgang, “Evangelische Studentengemeinde — Kirche an der Hochschule?” in Christen in der Demokratie, ed. Albertz, Heinrich and Thomsen, Joachim (Wuppertal: Peter Hammer Verlag, 1978).Google Scholar

23. See Pro ökumene, /Leben, Ohne Rüstung, eds., Ohne Rüstung leben (Gütersloh: Gütersloher Verlagshaus Gerd Mohn, 1983).Google Scholar

24. On the organization of German churches see Spotts, Frederic, The Churches and Politics in West Germany (Middletown, CT: Wesleyan University Press, 1973).Google Scholar

25. Vogel, , Kirche und Wiederbewaffnung, p. 27.Google Scholar

26. See, for example, the coverage of the 1987 Kirchentag in the Frankfurter Rundschau and the Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, 12–20 06, 1987Google Scholar. The Kirchentag also enjoyed extensive television coverage.

27. “Gottes Liebe beginnt nicht erst mit der Geburt,” FAZ, 3 11 1987.Google Scholar

28. Heinemann resigned as Adenauer's minister of the interior over the rearmament issue and formed his own party, the Gesamtdeutsche Volkspartei. See Vogel, , Kirche und Wiederbewaffnung, pp. 72–142.Google Scholar

29. Frieden wahren, fördern und erneuern (Gütersloh: Gütersloher Verlagshaus Gerd Mohn, 1981).Google Scholar

30. Nissen, , “Prospects for Realignment of the West German Party System.”Google Scholar

31. On this point see Spotts, , Churches and Policies in West Germany.Google Scholar

32. Doering-Manteuffel, Anselm, Katholizismus und Wiederbewaffnung: Die Haltung der deutschen Katholiken gegenüber der Wehrfrage 1948–1955 (Mainz: Matthias-Grünewald-Verlag, 1981), p. 42.Google Scholar

33. For a discussion of the ideological basis of postwar political Catholicism, see Kraiker, Gerhard, Politischer Katholizismus in der BRD: eine ideologiekritische Analyse (Stuttgart: Verlag W. Kohlhammer, 1972).Google Scholar

34. Forster, Karl, “Der deutsche Katholizismus in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland,” in Der soziale und politische Katholizismus: Entwicklungslinien in Deutschland 1803–1963, ed. Rauscher, Anton (München: Günter Olzog Verlag, 1981), pp. 209–264, here p. 222–32.Google Scholar

35. Spotts, , Churches and Politics in West Germany, p. 241.Google Scholar

36. See, for example, Baring, Arnulf, Aussenpolitik in Adenauers Kanzlerdemokratie (München: Oldenbourg Verlag, 1969), pp. 204, 205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

37. Manteuffel, , Katholizismus, pp. 1–32.Google Scholar

38. Mai, Gunther, Westliche Sicherheitspolitik im Kallen Krieg: Der Korea-Krieg und die deutsche Wiederbewaffnung 1950 (Boppard am Rhein: Harald Boldt Verlag, 1977), pp. 99–108.Google Scholar

39. Manteuffel, , Katholizismus, pp. 99–108.Google Scholar

40. Kubbig, Bernd, Kirche und Kriegsdienstverweigerung, pp. 93–96.Google Scholar

41. Lehmann, Reinhold, “Abrüstung, die tödliche Verschwendung” in Kirche in der Gesellschaft: der katholische Beitrag 1978/79, ed. Wichmann, Jürgen (München: Günter Olzog Verlag, 1978), pp. 19–33, here, p. 21.Google Scholar

42. Honecker, Martin, “Kontroversen um den Frieden in der evangelischen Kirche und Theologie,” Politische Studien 33, no. 261 (1982): 17–25.Google Scholar

43. Hürten, Heinz, “Zur Haltung des deutschen Katholizismus gegenüber der Sicherheits- und Bündnispolitik der Bundesrepublik Deutschland 1948–1960,” in Katholizismus im politischen System der Bundesrepublik 1949–1963, ed. Langer, Albrecht (Paderborn: Ferdinand Schüningh, 1978), pp. 83–102, here p. 98.Google Scholar

44. The most prominent example of this was Gundlach, Gustav, “Die Lehre Pius XII vom moderenen Krieg,”Google Scholar published in Stimmen der Zeit, April 1959, and in Forster, Karl, ed., Kann der atomarer Verteidigungskrieg ein gerechter Krieg sein? (München: Karl Zink Verlag, 1960), pp. 105–134.Google Scholar

45. Herder Korrespondenz 12, no. 9 (06 1958): 395–97.Google Scholar

46. Dirks, Walter, “Die Gefahr der Gleichschaltung,” Frankfurter Hefte 13, no. 6 (06 1959): 379–91.Google Scholar

47. Forster, Karl, “Der deutsche Katholizismus,” pp. 234–37.Google Scholar

48. In particular, his “Pacim in Terris” of April 1963.

49. In particular in “Gaudium et spes.”

50. Dirks, Walter, “Abschied vom ‘gerechten Krieg,’” Frankfurter Hefte 22, 7 (07 1967): 489–96.Google Scholar

51. Glatzel, Norbert and Nagel, Ernst Josef, eds., Frieden in Sicherheit: Zur Weiterent-wicklung der katholischen Friedensethik (Freiburg: Herder Verlag, 1981), pp. 133–41.Google Scholar

52. Forster, , “Der deutsche Katholizismus,” pp. 241–47.Google Scholar

53. Kreis, Bensberger, Ein Memorandum deutscher Katholiken zu den polnisch-deutschen Fragen (Mainz: Matthias-Grünewald-Verlag, 1968).Google Scholar

54. Erb, Gottfried, “Das ‘Bensberger Memorandum’/Geschichte und erste Stel-lungnahmen,” Frankfurter Hefte, 23, 4 (04 1968): 219–21.Google Scholar

55. Tholen, Norbert, “Die Höhe des Glaubens und die Niederungen der Politik: Bishöfe schweigen zum Polenvertrag,” Frankfurter Hefte 31, 5 (05 1976): 4, 5.Google Scholar

56. Scharffenorth, , “Konflikte in der Evangelischen Kirche,” p. 42.Google Scholar

57. The church, under pressure from the laity, did stand up for the individual's right to C.O. status in the 1950's rearmament debate, but only in cases where the war in question was objectively unjust, and not for conscientious objection in principle. See Manteuffel, , Katholizismus und Wiederbewaffnung, p. 236Google Scholar. The qualified nature of this support was reinforced by the insistence on the part of the Catholic youth organization (BDKJ), one of the groups which pressed most strongly for the right to C.O. status, that C.O.'s should have to justify themselves before a panel, in contrast to the EKD position that the individual conscience cannot be judged by others. See Kubbig, , Kirche und Kriegsdienstverweigerung, p. 92, on this point.Google Scholar

58. Kubbig, , Kirche und Kriegsdienstverweigerung, p. 91.Google Scholar

59. Ibid., 96–99.

60. von Eichborn, Wolfgang, “Politisierung der Kriegsdienstverweigerung,” in Duchrow and Scharffenorth, eds., Konflikte zwischen Wehrdienst und Friedensdiensten, p. 160.Google Scholar

61. Manteuffel, , Katholizismus, p. 236.Google Scholar

62. Nissen, , “Prospects for a Realignment of the West German Party System.”Google Scholar

63. Ruh, Ulrich, “Schwiergkeiten mit dem Frieden,” Herder Korrespondenz 35, 2 (02 1981): 53–55.Google Scholar

64. “Zur aktuellen Friedensdiskussion. Eine Stellungnahme des Zentralkomitees der deutschen Katholiken,” Herder Korrespondenz 35, no. 12 (12 1981): 624–30.Google Scholar

65. Mühleisen, Hans-Otto, “Grundstrukturen der Friedensdiskussion in der katholischen Kirche,” Politische Studien 33, no. 261 (1982): 261, here p. 44.Google Scholar

66. Much of this comes from an interview conducted by the author in June 1984, with one of the most active Bonn representatives of the group.

67. On this point see Sigal, Leon, Nuclear Forces in Europe (Washington, D. C.: The Brookings Institution, 1984), p. 64.Google Scholar