Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T21:26:20.097Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Political Philosophy in the Twentieth Century

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 February 2009

Catherine H. Zuckert
Affiliation:
Editor in Chief

Extract

In this issue we are proud to present eight essays celebrating the lives and works of some of the most pre-eminent political philosophers who wrote in the twentieth century. These essays are authored, moreover, by some of these philosophers' most distinguished students. Their readings can and, no doubt, will be contested; it is characteristic of political philosophy that its materials – textual as well as phenomenological – are subjects of debate.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © University of Notre Dame 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Fott, David is the author of John Dewey: America's Philosopher of Democracy (Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield, 1998)Google Scholar.

2 See, for example, Strauss's, Leo review of John Dewey's German Philosophy and Politics (New York: Putnam, 1942)Google Scholar, in What Is Political Philosophy? and Other Studies (Glencoe, IL: The Free Press, 1959), 279–81, and Arendt, Hannah, Men in Dark Times (New York: Harcourt, Brace, and World, 1968)Google Scholar.

3 Villa, Dana is the author of Arendt and Heidegger (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1996)Google Scholar and editor of the Cambridge Companion to Arendt (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2000) as well as Politics, Philosophy, Terror: Essays on the Thought of Hannah Arendt (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1999). Smith, Steven B. is author of Reading Strauss (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar and editor of a forthcoming Cambridge Companion to Leo Strauss (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2009).

4 See Faith and Political Philosophy: The Strauss-Voegelin Correspondence. Trans., edited, and introduced by Peter Emberley and Barry Cooper (Pennsylvania Park, Pennsylvania: Pennsylvania State University Press, 1992). Ellis Sandoz is Director of the Eric Voegelin Institute at Louisiana State University, Founder of the Eric Voegelin Society, and Editor of Volumes 10, 11, 12, and 34 of the Collected Works of Eric Voegelin, currently being published by the University of Missouri Press.

5 Galston, William A. is the author of Liberal Pluralism: The Implications of Value Pluralism for Political Theory and Practice (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar. Chapter 5 deals explicitly with the liberalism of Isaiah Berlin. Fuller, Timothy has edited and written introductions to several collections of Oakeshott's essays: Religion, Politics and the Moral Life (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1993)Google Scholar, Rationalism in Politics, a new and expanded edition (Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, 1991), On History and other essays, a new edition (Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, 1999), The Politics of Faith and the Politics of Scepticism (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1996), The Voice of Liberal Learning: Michael Oakeshott on Education (Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, 2001).

6 Weithman, Paul J. is the editor (along with Henry S. Richardson) of The Philosophy of Rawls: A Collection of Essays (New York: Garland Press, 1999)Google Scholar, 5 vols. Having himself studied with Rawls at Harvard, Weithman, also wrote “John Rawls: A Remembrance,” Review of Politics 65, no. 1 (Winter 2003): 510CrossRefGoogle Scholar, at the time of his death.

7 “What Is Political Philosophy?” 17.

8 Pierre Manent, “The Fate and Meaning of Political Philosophy in Our Century,” lecture given 9 June 1999 to the Library of Congress, Washington, D. C. (Selection to be found at http://www.loc.gov/bicentennial/frontiersexcerpts.html.)

9 Strauss, Leo, “What Can We Learn From Political Theory?The Review of Politics 69, no. 4 (2007): 515–16Google Scholar.