Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T12:52:08.021Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Autonomy and Liberal Democracy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 August 2009

Sanford Lakoff
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Continuing philosophic doubt concerning the moral foundations of human rights threatens to undermine the growing belief in liberal democracy. This doubt has its roots in the reaction against the Enlightenment and is evident even in John Rawls's retreat from the apparent universalism of his theory of justice. There are good grounds, however, for regarding the traditional Western belief in moral and political autonomy as a sound basis for human rights and liberal democracy.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Review of Politics , Volume 52 , Issue 3 , Summer 1990 , pp. 378 - 396
Copyright
Copyright © University of Notre Dame 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Notes

1. Ever the Orlando Furioso of American expatriates, he adds: “It is a TV-revolution we are witnessing, a rush towards the ‘California-promise’ that America has offered to the common man on this tired earth. American standards of dress, nourishment, locomotion, entertainment, housing are today the concrete Utopia in revolutions…. The new temples to liberty … will be McDonald's and Kentucky Fried Chicken” (George Steiner, “The State of Europe,” Granta 30 (Winter 1990): 130). Anthony Lewis, who brought Steiner's remarks to American attention in The New York Times (1 June 1990), rightly criticizes Steiner for being “far too cynical in his dismissal of the longing for political freedom.”

2. Fukuyama, Francis, “The End of History?” The National Interest, no. 16 (Summer 1989), pp. 3–18.Google Scholar

3. Arendt, Hannah, The Origins of Totalitarianism (New York: Harcourt Brace, 1951), pp. 435–36.Google Scholar

4. See Rawls, John, “Kantian Constructivism in Moral Theory: The Dewey Lectures 1980,” Journal of Philosophy 77, no. 9 (09 1980): 515–57.Google Scholar

5. Rawls, John, A Theory of Justice (Cambridge, MA.: Harvard University Press, 1971).Google Scholar

6. Hartz, Louis, The Liberal Tradition in America (New York: Harcourt Brace, 1955).Google Scholar

7. Rawls, John, “Justice as Fairness: Political Not Metaphysical,” Philosophy and Public Affairs 14, no. 3 (Summer 1985): 225.Google Scholar

8. Ibid., p. 230.

9. Ibid., p. 227.

10. Polin, Raymond, Politique et Philosophic chez Thomas Hobbes (Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1953), pp. xiii and 187–90.Google Scholar

11. Toulmin, Stephen, Cosmopolis: The Hidden Agenda of Modernity (New York: Free Press, 1990), p. 8.Google Scholar

12. The division was first noted by Ernest Lavisse, a contemporary observer, in 1899. See Brédin, Jean–denis, The Affair: The Case of Alfred Dreyfus, trans. Mehlman, Jeffrey (New York: George Braziller, 1986), p. 538.Google Scholar

13. Megill, Allan, Prophets of Extremity (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1985), p. 340.Google Scholar

14. Farrar, Cynthia, The Origins of Democratic Thinking: The Invention of Politics in Classical Greece (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988), p. 103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

15. Ibid.

16. Ibid.

17. Ibid., p. 104.

18. Ibid., p. 105.

19. Ibid., p. 106.

20. Cassirer, Ernst, Kant's Life and Thought, trans. Haden, James (New Haven and London: Yale University Press, 1981), pp. 243–44.Google Scholar Quotation from Kant is from the Foundations of the Metaphysics of Morals, first section.

21. Berlin, Isaiah, Four Essays on Liberty (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1969), pp. 152–53.Google Scholar

22. Sartori, Giovanni, The Theory of Democracy Revisited, 2 vols. (Chatham, NJ: Chatham House Publishers, 1987), 2: 315–20.Google Scholar

23. Dahl, Robert A., Democracy and Its Critics (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1989), p. 91.Google Scholar

24. Pennock, J. Roland, Democratic Political Theory (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1979), p. 219.Google Scholar For a similar view redefining the link between liberalism and autonomy, see Raz, Joseph, The Morality of Freedom (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1986), esp. pp. 400–429.Google Scholar

25. See Lijphart, Arend, Democracies (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1984)CrossRefGoogle Scholar and Power Sharing in South Africa (Berkeley: Institute for International Studies, 1985).Google Scholar

26. Whitman, Walt, Democratic Vistas (New York: Liberal Arts Press, 1949), p. 15.Google Scholar