Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-29T04:49:23.490Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Teaching Palestine-Israel: A Pedagogy of Delay and Suspension

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 May 2019

Daniel A. Segal
Daniel A. Segal*
Affiliation:
Pitzer College1
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Pedagogical Perspective
Information
Review of Middle East Studies , Volume 53 , Issue 1 , June 2019 , pp. 83 - 88
Copyright
Copyright © Middle East Studies Association of North America, Inc. 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

1

Daniel A. Segal is the Jean M. Pitzer Professor of Anthropology and a professor of history at Pitzer College of the Claremont Colleges. His most recent scholarly publication is Daniel A. Segal, “Witnessing Chimpanzee–Human Closeness: Jane Goodall at Gombe and Since,” Anthropological Quarterly 90, no. 4 (2017): 1189–1235, https://muse.jhu.edu/article/686173/pdf. He recently published an op-ed on why Pitzer College faculty voted to suspend a study-abroad program in Haifa, Israel: Segal, “Why Israel?,” Inside Higher Ed, January 21, 2019, accessed February 26, 2019, https://www.insidehighered.com/views/2019/01/21/why-faculty-pitzer-college-voted-suspend-study-abroad-program-israel-opinion.

References

2 Brenneis, Donald, Shore, Cris, and Wright, Susan, “Getting the Measure of Academia: Universities and the Politics of Accountability,” Anthropology in Action 12, no. 1 (2005): 1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Strathern, Marilyn, ed., Audit Cultures: Anthropological Studies in Accountability, Ethics, and the Academy (London: Routledge, 2000)Google Scholar.

3 On generational shifts among U.S. Jews in regard to Israel, see Beinart, Peter, “The Failure of the American Jewish Establishment,” The New York Review of Books (June 10, 2010).

4 The use of “suspension” in this essay came about fortuitously, albeit with twists and turns. As I taught about Palestine-Israel in the fall of 2018, I also introduced a proposal for Faculty Meeting at Pitzer College, in regard to our one approved study-abroad program in Israel, at the University of Haifa. In the working draft of that proposal, I had written a call to “end” the program, but just before sending the proposal out to the Faculty, I thought better of that and adopted the term “suspend” until specific conditions had been met. Then, on February 6, 2019, Claremont SJP sponsored a panel of outside speakers at Pitzer in support of the motion. In that context, Mark Minch-de Leon gave an incisive short talk on the value of “suspension” as a political strategy – as a way to disrupt “business as normal” in regard to normalized evil. A few weeks later, when I sat down to draft this text, Mark's comments, still fresh in my memory, led me to add “and suspension” to what I had previously thought of as a “pedagogy of delay.”

5 A useful short text in this regard, which I have had my students read as an in-class assignment, is Paul Krugman, “The Centrist Cop-Out,” The New York Times (July 29, 2011).

6 DuBois, W.E.B., “The Concept of Race,” chapter 5 in Dusk of Dawn: An Essay Toward an Autobiography of a Race Concept” (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1940)Google Scholar; Morgan, Edmund, “Slavery and Freedom: the American Paradox,” Journal of American History, 59, no. 1 (1972): 5–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Fields, Barbara, “Ideology and Race in American History” in Region, Race, and Reconstruction: Essays in Honor of C. Vann Woodward, eds. Kousser, J. Morgan and McPherson, James M. (New York: Oxford University Press, 1982), 143–77Google Scholar; Fields, Barbara, “Slavery, Race and Ideology in the United States of America, New Left Review, 181 (May–June 1990)Google Scholar; Handler, Richard and Segal, Daniel, “Cultural Approaches to Nationalism,” in The Sage Handbook of Nations and Nationalism, eds. Delanty, Gerard and Kumar, Krishnan (London: Sage Publications, 2006), 57–65Google Scholar.

7 Sand, Shlomo, The Invention of the Jewish People (New York: Verso Books, 2009)Google Scholar.

8 Pomeranz, Kenneth and Segal, Daniel, “Troubled Partitions,” in A World History, A Human History (in preparation)Google Scholar.

9 Relevant here is that along with Arabs and Jews, we also find Arab Jews; see, for example Levy, Lital, “Historicizing the Concept of Arab Jews in the Mashriq,” The Jewish Quarterly Review 98, no. 4 (2008): 452–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

10 My thinking about “beginnings” has been jump-started, in a sense, by both Said, Edward, Beginnings: Intentions and Method (New York: Columbia University Press, 1985)Google Scholar and Roth, Phillip, Portnoy's Complaint (New York: Random House, 1967), particularly 274Google Scholar.