No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
The Past Explains the Present: Dealing with Anfal in the Kurdistan Region
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 27 January 2023
Abstract
“Transitional justice” refers to a set of strategies for promoting reconciliation in societies that have been ravaged by conflict and human rights abuses in the recent past. In some cases, however, the political leaders of post-conflict societies choose not to pursue transitional justice, instead preferring to keep the status-quo peace. This essay explores the situation in the Kurdistan region of Iraq after the genocidal Anfal campaign of the late 1980s. The Kurdish political authorities at the time did not use any transitional justice measure against the Kurds who collaborated in the persecution and killing of their fellow Kurds. Instead, they declared a unilateral amnesty for all collaborators, without the consent of the victims’ families. This paper argues that this grant of “blanket amnesty,” which protected the accused from legal liability at the expense of victims’ right to justice, brought neither justice nor peace. Conversely, it negatively affected the process of democratization, rule of law, and social reconciliation in the region. The paper concludes that justice and lasting peace will not be realized in the region if the abuses of the past are left unaddressed.
- Type
- Special Focus: Revisiting Legacies of Anfal and Reconsidering Genocide in the Middle East Today: Collective Memory, Victimhood, Resilience and Enduring Trauma
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Middle East Studies Association
References
1 Olsen, TD, Payne, LA, Reiter, AG, “Transitional Justice in the World, 1970–2007: Insights from a New Dataset,” Journal of Peace Research 47.6 (November 2010): 803CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
2 Gibson, James L., “Truth, Justice, and Reconciliation: Judging the Fairness of Amnesty in South Africa,” American Journal of Political Science 46.3 (July 2002): 540CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
3 For more information about the amnesty and collective amnesia in Spain, see: Rigby, Andrew, “Amnesty and amnesia in Spain,” Peace Review 12.1 (2000): 73–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
4 For reviews see: Black, George, Genocide in Iraq: the Anfal Campaign against the Kurds (Washington: Human Rights Watch, 1993)Google Scholar. Available at: https://www.hrw.org/reports/1993/iraqanfal/; Montgomery, Bruce P., “The Iraqi Secret Police Files: A Documentary Record of the Anfal Genocide,” Archivaria (2001)Google Scholar; Yildiz, Kerim, The Kurds in Iraq-: The Past, Present and Future (London: Pluto Press, 2007)Google Scholar; McDowall, David, A Modern History of the Kurds (London: IB Tauris, 2004)Google Scholar.
5 For example, see: Natali, Denise, The Kurdish Quasi-Sate: Development and Dependency in Post-Gulf War Iraq (Syracuse: Syracuse University Press, 2010)Google Scholar; Gareth R. V. Stansfield, Iraqi Kurdistan: Political Development and Emergent Democracy (London: Routledge, 2003); MacQueen, Benjamin, “Democratization, Elections and the ‘de facto State Dilemma’: Iraq's Kurdistan Regional Government,” Cooperation and Conflict 50.4 (December 2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
6 Gunter, Michael M., “Civil War in Iraqi Kurdistan: The KDP–PUK Conflict,” Middle East Journal 50.2 (Spring, 1996)Google Scholar.
7 Brendan O'Leary, John McGarry, and Khaled Salih, eds., The Future of Kurdistan in Iraq (Pennsylvania: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2006); Machlis, Elisheva, “Shi'i–Kurd Relations in Post-2003 Iraq: Visions of Nationalism,” Middle East Policy (November, 2021)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Leezenberg, Michiel, “Iraqi Kurdistan: Contours of a Post-Civil War Society,” Third World Quarterly 26.4–5 (May 2008)Google Scholar.
8 Mansour, Renad, “Rethinking Recognition: The Case of Iraqi Kurdistan,” Cambridge International Law Journal 3.4 (January 2014)Google Scholar; Baser, Bahar and Toivanen, Mari, “The Politics of Genocide Recognition: Kurdish Nation-Building and Commemoration in the post-Saddam Era,” Journal of Genocide Research 19.3 (June 2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
9 For a detailed account on the Anfal campaigns, see: Black, Genocide in Iraq.
10 Anfal Campaign and Kurdish Genocide, accessed 10 December 2021, https://us.gov.krd/en/issues/anfal-campaign-and-kurdish-genocide/.
11 Iraq: Kurdistan Regional Government demands compensation for Anfal victims, accessed April 15, 2021, https://www.middleeastmonitor.com/20210415-iraq-kurdistan-regional-government-demands-compensation-for-anfal-victims/.
12 Black, Genocide in Iraq.
13 Nahwi Saeed, “Why is Reconciliation so Important in Iraqi Kurdistan? The Case of Anfal,” LSE University, accessed April 28, 2021, https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/mec/2021/04/28/why-is-reconciliation-so-important-in-iraqi-kurdistan-the-case-of-anfal/.
14 Mohammed Haji Mahmood, “In my belief, there is no such difference between Jash and Mustashars, they all collaborated with the former regime,” Pirs, April 14, 2021, 8.
15 Ibid.
16 Saeed, “Why Reconciliation.”
17 “Arrest warrant for Baʿthist Kurds,” ANFNews, accessed October 16, 2016, https://anfenglish.com/news/arrest-warrant-for-baathist-kurds-2277.
18 Ali Heme Salih, “KRG anti-corruption reform must keep moving in the right direction,” Rudaw, accessed August 20, 2020, https://www.rudaw.net/english/opinion/10082019.
19 Essay 10 of the law of the Iraqi High Tribunal, https://iraqld.hjc.iq/LoadLawBook.aspx?SC=210220061156077.
20 For further details, see: Lambourne, Wendy, “Post-conflict Peacebuilding: Meeting Human Needs for Justice and Reconciliation,” Peace, Conflict and Development 4 (April 2004)Google Scholar; Parent, Geneviève, “Reconciliation and Justice After Genocide: A Theoretical Exploration,” Genocide Studies and Prevention 5.3 (December 2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Lund, Patricia and McGovern, Mark, “Whose Justice? Rethinking Transitional Justice from the Bottom Up,” Journal of Law and Society 35.2 (2008)Google Scholar; Mendeloff, David, “Trauma and Vengeance: Assessing the Psychological and Emotional Effects of Post-Conflict Justice,” Human Rights Quarterly 31 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
21 Wenzel, Michael and Okimoto, Tyler G., “Retributive Justice,” in Handbook of Social Justice Theory and Research, eds. Sabag, Ḳlarah and Schmitt, Manfred (New York: Springer, 2016), 238Google Scholar.
22 Gibson, “Truth,” 544.
23 Wenzel and Okimoto, “Distributive Justice,” 241.
24 Ibid.
25 For more details on the fairness of the South African amnesty, see: Gibson, “Truth,” 540-56.
26 Mamdani, Mahmood, “Amnesty or Impunity? A Preliminary Critique of the Report of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission of South Africa (TRC),” diacritics 32.3/4 (Autumn–Winter 2002): 33CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
27 Gibson, “Truth,” 541.
28 Cunneen, Chris, “Exploring the Relationship between Reparations, the Gross Violation of Human Rights, and Restorative Justice,” in Handbook of Restorative Justice: A Global Perspective, eds. Sullivan, Dennis and Tifft, Larry (New York: Routledge, 2008), 358Google Scholar.
29 Chris Cunneen, “Exploring Relationship,” 358.
30 See: “Parliament calls for better services and compensation for Anfal survivors and families in Garmian and Chamchamal,” accessed April 17, 2021: https://www.parliament.krd/english/parliament-activities/latest-news/posts/2021/april/parliament-calls-for-better-services-and-compensation-for-anfal-survivors-and-families-in-garmian-and-chamchamal/; and “KRG demands material and moral compensation for Al-Anfal victims,” Shafaq, April 14, 2021, accessed April 20, 2021, https://shafaq.com/en/kurdistan/krg-demands-material-and-moral-compensation-for-al-anfal-victims.
31 Gibson, “Truth,” 543.
32 Ibid.
33 Bloomfield, David, Barnes, Teresa, and Huyse, Luc, eds. Reconciliation After Violent Conflict: A Handbook (Stockholm: Bulls Tryckeri AB Halmstad, 2003)Google Scholar, part one, 12, https://www.idea.int/sites/default/files/publications/reconciliation-after-violent-conflict-handbook.pdf.
34 Parent, Geneviève, “Reconciliation and Justice After Genocide: A Theoretical Exploration,” Genocide Studies and Prevention 5.3 (December 2010): 279CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
35 For more details on amnesty and collective amnesia in Spain, see: Rigby, “Amnesty,” 73.
36 Rigby, “Amnesty,” 74.
37 Bloomfield, Barnes, and Huyse, Reconciliation and Justice, 30.
38 Ibid.
39 “Sultanism is a particular form of rule that is based on cronyism, clientelism, nepotism, personalism, and dynasticism.” For more details, see: Kawa Hassan, “Kurdistan's Politicized Society Confronts a Sultanistic System,” Carnegie Middle East Centre, August 18, 2015, https://carnegie-mec.org/2015/08/18/kurdistan-s-politicized-society-confronts-sultanistic-system-pub-61026.
40 Saeed “Why reconciliation.”
41 Bloomfield, Barnes, and Huyse, Reconciliation and Justice, 31.
42 “Arrest Warrant.”
43 Rigby, Andrew, Justice and Reconciliation after the Violence (London: Lynne Rienner, 200)Google Scholar.
44 Bloomfield, Barnes, and Huyse, Reconciliation and Justice, 31.