Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T04:35:35.121Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Lost boomerangs, the rebound effect and transnational advocacy networks: a discursive approach to norm diffusion

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 April 2018

Maria Martin de Almagro Open the ORCID record for Maria Martin de Almagro [Opens in a new window]
Maria Martin de Almagro*
Affiliation:
Marie Curie Postdoctoral Fellow, Department of Politics and International Studies, University of Cambridge
*
*Correspondence to: Maria Martin de Almagro, University of Cambridge and Vesalius College. Author’s email: [email protected]; website: http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3760-0638
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article aims to show the added value of studying transnational advocacy networks through a discursive approach in order to better understand the outcomes of norm diffusion in postconflict contexts. I argue that constructivist approaches to norm diffusion fall short as an explanation of norm adoption because they assume an automatic process of norm propagation through socialisation mechanisms. The first goal of the article is then to discuss how the internal dynamics of discourse negotiation in transnational advocacy networks impact the diffusion and implementation of international norms. The second goal is to propose the concept of the rebound effect and to explore the conditions under which it takes place. Through data collected during extended fieldwork, the article examines a prominent case, namely the transnational campaign for the implementation of United Nations Security Council Resolution 1325 on Women, Peace, and Security in Burundi and Liberia. I ask why and how the campaign was understood as a success in Liberia and as a failure in Burundi. I argue that there is another way of looking at these cases in less dichotomised ways. Crucially, my findings demonstrate how in both cases a very particular discourse on gender security is (re)produced through power relations between local and transnational activists limiting the type of policies that are advocated for and depoliticising the grassroots.

Keywords

BurundiConstructivismGenderDiscourseLiberiaNorm DiffusionPoststructuralismResolution 1325Subject-PositionTransnational Advocacy Networks
Type
Research Article
Information
Review of International Studies , Volume 44 , Issue 4 , October 2018 , pp. 672 - 693
Copyright
© British International Studies Association 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 The UN NGO Working Group on Women, Peace, and Security is a consortium of 14 international NGOs with headquarters in New York whose mission is to conduct policy analysis, monitoring, and advocacy for the implementation of the Women, Peace, and Security Agenda.

2 Keck and Sikkink define norms as ‘shared ideas, expectations and beliefs about appropriate behaviour’ and they are ‘what gives the world structure, order and stability’. Keck, Margaret and Sikkink, Kathryn, Activists Beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks in International Politics (Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press, 1998), p. 894 Google Scholar.

3 WPSAC, ‘Creating a Transnational People’s Plan for UNSCR1325’, available at: {//wpsac.wordpress.com/2013/05/21/creating-a-transnational-peoples-plan-for-unscr-1325/} accessed 27 June 2014.

4 Reeves, Audrey, ‘Feminist knowledge and emerging govermentality in UN peacekeeping’, International Feminist Journal of Politics, 14:3 (2012), pp. 348–369 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; McRobbie, Angela, The Aftermath of Feminism: Gender, Culture and Social Change (Los Angeles and London: Sage Publications, 2009)Google Scholar.

5 Fieldwork notes, Monrovia, Liberia, August 2013.

6 Fieldwork notes, Bujumbura, Burundi, April 2013. Interview (a): INGO international staff member, Bujumbura, Burundi, 10 December 2012; Interview (b): ex-project manager for a national women organisation, Bujumbura, Burundi, 12 June 2012; Interview (c): staff member at UNWOMEN, Bujumbura, Burundi, 20 June 2012.

7 UNIFEM, ‘Women’s Participation in Peace Negotiations: Connections between Presence and Influence’ (New York: UNIFEM, 7 August 2010)Google Scholar.

8 Haas, Peter, Knowledge, Power, and International Policy Coordination (Columbia, CA: University of California Press, 1997)Google Scholar.

9 Finnemore, Martha, National Interests in International Society (Ithaca NY: Cornell University Press, 1996)Google Scholar.

10 Transnational advocacy networks comprise ‘relevant actors working internationally on an issue, who are bound together by shared values, a common discourse, and dense exchanges of information and services’. Keck and Sikkink, Activists Beyond Borders. These include international and domestic NGOs, social movements, international organisations, national governments, and individuals.

11 True, Jacqui and Mintrom, Michael, ‘Transnational networks and policy diffusion: the case of gender mainstreaming’, International Studies Quarterly, 45:1 (2001), pp. 27–57 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

12 Keck and Sikkink, Activists Beyond Borders, p. 12; della Porta, Donatella and Tarrow, Sidney (eds), Transnational Protest and Global Activism (London: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, 2005)Google Scholar.

13 Keck and Sikkink, Activists Beyond Borders, p. 8.

14 Krook, Mona and True, Jacqui, ‘Rethinking the life cycles of international norms: The United Nations and the global promotion of gender equality’, European Journal of International Relations, 18:1 (2012), pp. 103–127 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

15 Van Kersbergen, Kees and Verbeek, Bertjan, ‘The politics of international norms: Subsidiarity and the imperfect competence regime of the European Union’, European Journal of International Relations, 13:2 (2007), pp. 217–238 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

16 Bucher, Bernd, ‘Acting abstractions: Metaphors, narrative structures, and the eclipse of agency’, European Journal of International Relations, 20:3 (2014), pp. 742–765 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

17 Krook and True, ‘Rethinking the life cycles of international norms’.

18 Zehfuss, Maja, Constructivism in International Relations: The Politics of Reality (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

19 Desai, Vandana, ‘NGOs, gender mainstreaming, and urban poor communities in Mumbai’, Gender and Development, 13:2 (2005), pp. 90–98 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Mendoza, Breny, ‘Transnational feminisms in question’, Feminist Theory, 3 (2002), pp. 295–314 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

20 Adler-Nissen, Rebecca, ‘Stigma management in international relations: Transgressive identities, norms, and order in international society’, International Organization, 68:1 (2014), pp. 143–176 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Zarakol, Ayşe, ‘What made the modern world hang together: socialisation or stigmatisation?’, International Theory, 6:2 (2014), pp. 311–332 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Epstein, Charlotte, The Power of Words in International Relations: Birth of an Anti-Whaling Discourse (Boston: MIT Press, 2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

21 Martha Finnemore and Kathryn Sikkink, ‘International norm dynamics and political change’, International Organization, 52:4 (1998), pp. 887–917; Keck and Sikkink, Activists Beyond Borders; Nadelmann, Ethan, ‘Global prohibition regimes: the evolution of norms in international society’, International Organization, 44:4 (1990), pp. 479–526 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Payne, Rodger, ‘Persuasion, frames and norm construction’, European Journal of International Relations, 7:1 (2001), pp. 37–61 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

22 Bucher, ‘Acting abstractions’, p. 748.

23 Kratochwil, Friedrich, ‘Rules’, Norms and Decisions: On the Conditions of Practical and Legal Reasoning in International Relations and Domestic Affairs (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

24 Klotz, Audie and Lynch, Cecilia, Strategies for Research in Constructivist International Relations (New York: ME Sharpe, 2007)Google Scholar; Finnemore and Sikkink, ‘International norm dynamics and political change’; Finnemore, Martha, The Purpose of Intervention: Changing Beliefs about Intervention (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2003)Google Scholar; Price, Richard, ‘Reversing the gun sights: Transnational civil society targets land mines’, International Organization, 52:3 (1998), pp. 613–644 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

25 Joachim, Jutta, Agenda Setting, the UN and NGOs: Gender Violence and Reproductive Rights (Washington: Georgetown University Press, 2007)Google Scholar.

26 Risse, Thomas, Ropp, Stephen, and Sikkink, Kathryn, The Power of Human Rights: International Norms and Domestic Change (Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

27 Ryan and Basini explain how many of the provisions contained in UNSCR1325 were already being implemented in Liberia and Sierra Leone before being named as such. Ryan, Caitlin and Basini, Helen, ‘UNSC Resolution 1325 national action plans in Liberia and Sierra Leone: an analysis of gendered power relations in hybrid peacebuilding’, Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding, 11:2 (2017), pp. 186–206 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

28 Acharya, Amitav, ‘How ideas spread: Whose norms matter? Norm localization and institutional change in Asian regionalism’, International Organization, 58:2 (2004), pp. 239–275 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Cortell, Andrew and Davis, James, ‘When norms clash: International norms, domestic practices, and Japan’s internalisation of the GATT/WTO’, Review of International Studies, 31:1 (2005), pp. 3–25 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Checkel, Jeffrey, ‘International institutions and socialization in Europe: Introduction and framework’, International Organization, 59:4 (2005), pp. 801–826 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Zimmermann, Lisbeth, ‘Same same or different? Norm diffusion between resistance, compliance and localization in post-conflict states’, International Studies Perspectives, 17:1 (2016)Google Scholar.

29 Badescu, Cristina and Weiss, Thomas, ‘Misrepresenting R2P and advancing norms: an alternative spiral?’, International Studies Perspectives, 11:4 (2010), pp. 354–374 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

30 Capie, David, ‘The responsibility to protect norms in Southeast Asia: Framing, resistance and the localization myth’, The Pacific Review, 25:1 (2012), pp. 75–93 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

31 Deitelhoff, Nicole and Zimmermann, Lisbeth, Things We Lost in the Fire: How Different Types of Contestation Affect the Validity of International Norms (Frankfurt am Main: PRIF Working Papers, 2013)Google Scholar.

32 Cortell and Davis, ‘When norms clash’.

33 McKeown, Ryder, ‘Norm regress: US revisionism and the slow death of the torture norm’, International Relations, 23:1 (2009), pp. 5–25 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

34 Acharya, ‘How ideas spread’; Acharya, Amitav, ‘Norm subsidiarity and regional orders: Sovereignty, regionalism, and rule-making in the Third World’, International Studies Quarterly, 55 (2011), pp. 95–123 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

35 Zwingel, Susanne, ‘How do norms travel? Theorizing international women’s rights in transnational perspective’, International Studies Quarterly, 56 (2012), pp. 115–129 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

36 Noutcheva, Gergana, ‘Fake, partial and imposed compliance: the limits of the EU’s normative power in the Western Balkans’, Journal of European Public Policy, 16:7 (2009), pp. 1065–1084 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

37 Goodman, Ryan and Jinks, Derek, ‘Incomplete internalization and compliance with human rights law’, European Journal of International Law, 19:4 (2008), pp. 725–748 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

38 Wiener, Antje, ‘Contested compliance: Interventions on the normative structure of world politics’, European Journal of International Relations, 10:2 (2004), pp. 189–234 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

39 Ginty, Roger Mac, International Peacebuilding and Local Resistance: Hybrid Forms of Peace (London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

40 Kratochwil, , ‘Rules’, Norms and Decisions; Mervyn Frost, Ethics in International Relations: A Constitutive Theory (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996)Google Scholar; Davis, James, Terms of Inquiry: On the Theory and Practice of Political Science (Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press, 2005)Google Scholar.

41 Wiener, Antje, ‘Enacting meaning-in-use: qualitative research on norms and international relations’, Review of International Studies, 35:1 (2009), pp. 175–193 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

42 Bucher, ‘Acting abstractions’, p. 742.

43 Niemann, Holger and Schillinger, Henrik, ‘Contestation “all the way down”? The grammar of contestation in norm research’, Review of International Studies, First View (2017), pp. 1–21 Google Scholar.

44 Zwingel, ‘How do norms travel?’, p. 122.

45 Epstein, Charlotte, ‘Who speaks? Discourse, the subject and the study of identity in international politics’, European Journal of International Relations, 17:2 (2011), p. 334 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

46 Betts, Alexander and Orchard, Phil, ‘Conclusions: Norms and the politics of implementation’, in Alexander Betts and Phil Orchard (eds), Implementation and World Politics: How International Norms Change Practice (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

47 Irvine, Jill, ‘Leveraging change’, International Feminist Journal of Politics, 15:1 (2012), pp. 20–38 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

48 Sunstein, Cass, ‘Social norms and social roles’, Columbia Law Review, 9:4 (1996), pp. 903–968 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Katzenstein, Peter, The Culture of National Security: Norms and Identity in World Politics (New York: Columbia University Press, 1996)Google Scholar; Finnemore and Sikkink, ‘International norm dynamics and political change’.

49 Renner, Judith, Discourse, Normative Change and the Quest for Reconciliation in Global Politics (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

50 Finnemore and Sikkink, ‘International norm dynamics and political change’, pp. 903–04.

51 Guillaume, Xavier, ‘Unveiling the “international”: Process, identity and alterity’, Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 35:3 (2007), pp. 741–759 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Onuf, Nicholas, World of our Making (Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina Press, 1989)Google Scholar.

52 Epstein, Charlotte, ‘Stop telling us how to behave: Socialization or infantilization?’, International Studies Perspectives, 13 (2012), pp. 135–145 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

53 Hertel, Shareen, Unexpected Power: Conflict and Change among Transnational Activists (Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press, 2006)Google Scholar.

54 Elkins, Zachary and Simmons, Beth, ‘On waves, clusters, and diffusion: a conceptual framework’, The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 598:1 (2005), pp. 33–51 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

55 Klotz and Lynch, Strategies for Research, p. 92.

56 Ayoub, Phillip, When States Come Out: Europe’s Sexual Minorities and the Politics of Visibility (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

57 Ayoub, Phillip, ‘Contested norms in new-adopter states: International determinants of LGBT rights legislation’, European Journal of International Relations, 21:2 (2015), pp. 293–322 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

58 Hertel, Unexpected Power.

59 Krook and True, ‘Rethinking the life cycles of international norms’, p. 104.

60 Finnemore and Sikkink, ‘International norm dynamics and political change’, p. 916.

61 Bucher, ‘Acting abstractions’, p. 755.

62 Epstein, Charlotte, ‘Constructivism or the eternal return of universals in International Relations: Why returning to language is vital to prolonging the owl’s flight’, European Journal of International Relations, 19:3 (2013), p. 501 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

63 Engelkamp, Stephan and Glaab, Katharina, ‘Writing norms: Constructivist norm research and the politics of ambiguity’, Alternatives, 40:3–4 (2015), pp. 201–218 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Epstein, The Power of Words in International Relations; Hansen, Lene, Security as Practice: Discourse Analysis and the Bosnian War (London: Routledge, 2006)Google Scholar; Shepherd, Laura, Gender, Violence and Security: Discourse as Practice (London: Zed, 2008)Google Scholar.

64 Foucault, Michael, The History of Sexuality, Volume I: An Introduction (New York: Vintage Books, 1990), p. 119 Google Scholar.

65 Hansen, Security as Practice.

66 Cook, Sam, ‘The “woman‐in‐conflict” at the UN Security Council: a subject of practice’, International Affairs, 92:2 (2016), p. 355 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

67 Richter, Melvin and Richter, Michaela, ‘Introduction: Translation of Reinhart Koselleck’s “Krise” in Geschichtliche Grundbegriffe’, Journal of the History of Ideas, 67:2 (2006), pp. 343–356 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

68 Shepherd, Gender, Violence and Security, pp. 20–3.

69 Laclau, Ernesto and Mouffe, Chantal, Hegemony and Socialist Strategy (London: Verso, 1985).Google Scholar

70 Benford, Robert, ‘Master frame’, in David Snow, Donatella della Porta, Bert Klandermans, and Doug McAdam (eds), The Wiley-Blackwell Encyclopedia of Social and Political Movements (New York: Wiley-Blackwell, 2013)Google Scholar.

71 Howard, David, Norval, Aletta, and Stavrakakis, Yannis, Discourse Theory and Political Analysis: Identities, Hegemonies and Social Change (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2000), p. 4 Google Scholar.

72 Bucher, ‘Acting abstractions’, p. 750.

73 Krook and True, ‘Rethinking the life cycles of international norms’.

74 Epstein, The Power of Words in International Relations.

75 Zehfuss, Constructivism in International Relations, p. 92.

76 Checkel, ‘International institutions and socialization in Europe’, pp. 801–26.

77 Hansen, Security as Practice; Shepherd, Gender, Violence and Security; Shepherd, Laura, ‘Gendering security’, in J. Peter Burgess (ed.), The Routledge Handbook of New Security Studies (London: Routledge, 2010), pp. 72–80 Google Scholar.

78 Catherine Eschle, ‘Gender and the subject of (anti)nuclear politics: Revisiting women’s campaigning against the bomb’, International Studies Quarterly, 57:4 (2013), pp. 713–24.

79 Jarvis, Lee, Times of Terror: Discourse, Temporality and the War on Terror (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Weldes, Jutta, ‘Constructing national interests’, European Journal of International Relations, 2:3 (1996), pp. 275–318 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

80 Griffin, Penny, Gendering the World Bank: Neoliberalism and the Gendered Foundations of Global Governance (London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Shepherd, Gender, Violence and Security.

81 Debrix, François, Tabloid Terror: War, Culture and Geopolitics (London: Routledge, 2008)Google Scholar.

82 Shepherd, Laura, ‘Constructing civil society: Gender, power and legitimacy in United Nations peacebuilding discourse’, European Journal of International Relations, 21:4 (2015), p. 890 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

83 Shapiro, Michael, Studies in Transdisciplinary Method: After the Aesthetic Turn (London: Routledge, 2013), p. 85 Google Scholar.

84 Shepherd, Gender, Violence and Security.

85 Several interviewees – INGOs staff and local NGOs staff – noted this fact.

86 Hansen, Security as Practice, pp. 19–21.

87 Shepherd, Laura, ‘“To save succeeding generations from the scourge of war”: the US, UN, and the violence of security’, Review of International Studies, 34:2 (2008), p. 294 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

88 Ibid.

89 McLeod, Laura, ‘Configurations of post-conflict: Impacts of representations of conflict and post-conflict upon the (political) translations of gender security within UNSCR 1325’, International Feminist Journal of Politics, 13:4 (2011), p. 595 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

90 Shepherd, ‘Gendering security’, p. 76.

91 I found inspiration for this approach on previous similar work conducted by McLeod, ‘Configurations of post-conflict’ and Eschle, ‘Gender and the subject of (anti)nuclear politics’.

92 Hudson, Heidi, ‘A double-edged sword of peace? Reflections on the tension between representation and protection in gendering liberal peacebuilding’, International Peacekeeping, 19:4 (2012), pp. 443–460 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

93 Interview (a).

94 Interview (b).

95 Government of Burundi, Plan d’Action National pour la mise en oeuvre de la Résolution 1325 (2011), available at: {http://www.peacewomen.org/assets/file/NationalActionPlans/burundi_nap_2012-16.pdf} accessed 14 April 2017; Government of Liberia, The Liberian National Action Plan for the Implementation of United Nations Resolution 1325 (2009), available at: http://www.peacewomen.org/assets/file/NationalActionPlans/liberia_nationalactionplanmarch2009.pdf} accessed 14 April 2017.

96 Interview (c).

97 Hudson, Heidi, ‘Doing security as though humans matter: a feminist perspective on gender and the politics of human security’, Security Dialogue, 36:2, pp. 155–174 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

98 Interview (d): a legal affairs staff at national women association in Bujumbura, Burundi, 12 December 2012.

99 Interview (f): a project manager of a national women organisation in Bujumbura, Burundi, 8 April 2013.

100 Interview (g): activist from grassroots group, Cibitoke province, Burundi, 9 April 2013.

101 Ibid.

102 Interview (f): a project manager of a national women organisation in Bujumbura, Burundi, 8 April 2013.

103 Carstensen, Martin, ‘Conceptualising ideational novelty: a relational approach, British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 17:2 (2015), pp. 284–297 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

104 Pleyers, Geoffrey, Alter-Globalization: Becoming Actors in a Global Age (Cambridge: Polity, 2010)Google Scholar.

105 Ibid., p. 185.

106 Ibid., p. 191.

107 Pratt, Nicola and Richter-Devroe, Sophie, ‘Critically examining UNSCR 1325 on women, peace and security’, International Feminist Journal of Politics, 13:4 (2011), p. 498 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

108 Kazoviyo, Gertrude and Gahungu, Pélagie, The Issue of Inheritance for Women in Burundi (Bujumbura: FRIDE and Ligue ITEKA, 2011)Google Scholar.

109 International Crisis Group, Les terres de la discorde (I): la réforme foncière au Burundi, Rapport Afrique n. 213 (2014), p. 7.

110 Association des Femmes Juristes du Burundi et Association des Juristes Catholiques du Burundi, Impact du vide juridique observé en matière des successions, des régimes matrimoniaux et des libéralités, 2012, Final report RML, p. 42.

111 For a detailed account on women’s collective action on land inheritance in Burundi, see Saiget, Marie, ‘(De-)Politicising women’s collective action: International actors and land inheritance in post-war Burundi’, Review of African Political Economy, 43:149 (2016), pp. 365–381 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

112 Interview (c).

113 Burundi National Action Plan (2009).

114 Interview (f).

115 Interview (h): woman activist, ex-staff member of an international NGO Burundi desk office, Bujumbura, 12 April 2012.

116 Interview (d).

117 Interview (d).

118 Interview (f).

119 Duncanson, Claire, Gender and Peacebuilding (Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, 2016), p. 138 Google Scholar.

120 Moran, Mary and Pitcher, Anne, ‘The “basket case” and the “poster child”: Explaining the end of civil conflicts in Liberia and Mozambique’, Third World Quarterly, 25:3 (2004), p. 504 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

121 Debusscher, Petra and de Almagro, Maria Martin, ‘Post-conflict women’s movements in turmoil: the challenges of success in Liberia in the 2005-aftermath’, The Journal of Modern African Studies, 54:2 (2016), pp. 293–316 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

122 For more information on the Peace Huts, see UNIFEM, ‘Women Building Peace and Preventing Sexual Violence in Conflict-Affected Contexts: A Review of Community-Based Approaches’, (October 2007), available at: {http://www.unwomen.org/~/media/Headquarters/Media/Publications/UNIFEM/0202_WomenBuildingPeaceAndPreventingSexualViolence_en.pdf}.

123 Interview (i): staff member of a women’s community based radio station in Monrovia, Liberia, 1 September 2013.

124 UNWOMEN, Preventing Conflict, Transforming Justice, Securing the Peace (New York: UN, 2015), p. 204 Google Scholar.

125 This data was presented by the Liberian Minister of Gender at the time, Julia Duncan Cassell, at the 56th session of the Commission on the Status of Women: ‘The Empowerment of Rural Women and their Role in Poverty and Hunger Eradication, Development Challenges and the Way Forward’, available at: {http://www.un.org/womenwatch/daw/csw/csw56/general-discussions/member-states/Liberia.pdf} accessed 9 August 2014.

126 Shepherd, Laura, ‘Sex, security and superhero(in)es: From 1325 to 1820 and beyond’, International Feminist Journal of Politics, 13:4 (2011), pp. 504–521 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

127 Interview (j): local staff from the local branch of an International NGO in Monrovia, Liberia, 8 August 2013.

128 Fuest, Veronika, ‘Contested inclusions: Pitfalls of NGO peace-building activities in Liberia’, Africa Spectrum (2010), pp. 3–33 Google Scholar.

129 WANEP and WIPNET, Women’s National Agenda for Peace, Security and Development. Adopted on 30 March 2006, presented to the Government of the Republic of Liberia (Monrovia: Women in Peacebuilding Network, 2006).

130 Interview (k): staff member and lawyer of a women professional association in Liberia, Monrovia, 6 August 2016.

131 Pratt, and Richter-Devroe, , cited in Soumita Basu, ‘The Global South writes 1325 (too)’, International Political Science Review, 37:3 (2016), pp. 362–374 Google Scholar.