Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T16:22:23.589Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On the theopolitics of sovereignty: Carl Schmitt and the theopolitics of global orders

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 March 2020

Thomas Moore Open the ORCID record for Thomas Moore [Opens in a new window]
Thomas Moore*
Affiliation:
Centre for the Study of Democracy, University of Westminster, London
*
*Corresponding author. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article considers how we can develop a reflexive reading of the theological contours of global politics through Carl Schmitt's account of sovereignty. In doing this it seeks to generate a critical architecture to understand the pluralistic registers of sovereignty within world politics. This article examines the theological dimensions of sovereignty, calling for a closer reading of the theopolitical discourses of legality and legitimacy at work within the largely secular discipline of International Relations. Tracing the pluralistic dimensions of sovereignty – juristic, popular, and theopolitical – allows us to see how sovereignty is operationalised through a range of distinct political registers. When the study of sovereignty is confused with questions of preference for modes of governing (whether secular, religious, democratic, and/or juristic) the complex historical sociology of sovereignty is overlooked. Contemporary scholarship in International Relations can benefit from closer engagement with the multiple, overlapping registers of sovereignty in global politics. We may disagree with Schmitt's reading of sovereignty as ‘theopolitics’ but there is real methodological value in engaging secular scholarship in thinking about religion as a constitutive domain for global order – alongside a rich range of critical approaches.

Keywords

SovereigntyTheologyCarl SchmittTheocracyReligionInternational Political Theory
Type
Research Article
Information
Review of International Studies , Volume 46 , Issue 5 , December 2020 , pp. 691 - 712
Copyright
Copyright © British International Studies Association 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Brown, Chris, Nardin, Terry, and Rengger, Nicholas (eds), International Relations in Political Thought (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002), p. 57CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

2 Hurd, Elizabeth Shakman, The Politics of Secularism in International Relations (New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 2007)Google Scholar.

3 Schmitt, Carl, ‘The legal world revolution’, Telos, 72 (1987), pp. 73–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

4 Mavelli, Luca, ‘Security and secularization in International Relations’, European Journal of International Relations, 18:2 (2012), p. 179CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

5 Chowdhury, Arjun and Duvall, Raymond, ‘Sovereignty and sovereign power’, International Theory, 6:2 (2014), p. 219CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

6 Louma-Aho, Mika, ‘Political theology, anthropomorphism, and person-hood of the state: The religion of IR’, International Political Sociology, 3:3 (2009), pp. 293–309CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

7 Ibid., p. 308.

8 Cavanaugh, William T., The Myth of Religious Violence: Secular Ideology and the Roots of Modern Conflict (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009), p. 123CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

9 Cavanaugh, William T., Theopolitical Imagination: Christian Practices of Space and Time (London: Continuum, 2002), p. 9Google Scholar.

10 Weber, Max, The Vocation Lectures (Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing, 2004)Google Scholar and Tilly, Charles, ‘War making and state making as organized crime’, in Evans, P. B., Rueschemeyer, D., and Skocpol, T. (eds), Bringing the State Back In (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985), pp. 169–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

11 Mouffe, Chantal, The Challenge of Carl Schmitt (London: Verso, 1999)Google Scholar.

12 Walzer, Michael, Just and Unjust Wars: A Moral Argument with Historical Illustrations (New York: Basic Books, 2015)Google Scholar.

13 Schmitt, Carl, Political Theology: Four Chapters on the Concept of Sovereignty (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1985), p. 5Google Scholar.

14 Moore, Thomas, ‘The paradox of the political: Carl Schmitt's autonomous account of politics’, The European Legacy, 15:6 (2010), pp. 721–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

15 Schmitt, Political Theology, p. 5.

16 Ibid., p. 6.

17 Ibid.

18 Ibid., pp. 6–7.

19 Ibid., p. 7.

20 Ibid., p. 8.

21 Ibid., pp. 8–9.

22 Ibid., p. 9.

23 Ibid., p. 11.

24 Ibid., p. 10.

25 Ibid., p. 12.

26 Ibid., p. 13.

27 Ibid., p. 13.

28 Ibid.

29 Ibid., p. 14.

30 Ibid., p. 15.

31 Ibid.

32 Ibid.

33 Kelsen, Hans, ‘Sovereignty and international law’, in Stankiewicz, W. J. (ed.), In Defence of Sovereignty (New York: Oxford University Press, 1969), p. 115Google Scholar.

34 Kelsen, ‘Sovereignty and international law’, p. 115.

35 Ibid.

36 Schmitt, Political Theology, p. 14.

37 Ibid., p. 21.

38 Ibid., pp. 32–3.

39 Sandal, Nukhet A. and James, Patrick, ‘Religion and International Relations theory: Towards a mutual understanding’, European Journal of International Relations, 17:3 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

40 Ibid., p. 6.

41 Schmitt, Political Theology, p. 36.

42 Luoma-Aho, Mika, God and International Relations (New York: Continuum, 2012), p. xivGoogle Scholar.

43 Fukuyama, Francis, The Origins of Political Order: From Prehuman Times to the French Revolution (London: Profile Books, 2011), p. 289Google Scholar.

44 Morgenthau, Hans, Politics Among Nations (New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1960), p. 256Google Scholar.

45 Kelsen, Hans, ‘The pure theory of law and analytical jurisprudence’, Harvard Law Review, 55:1 (1941), pp. 44–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

46 Ibid.

47 Schmitt, Political Theology, p. 41.

48 Suganami, Hidemi, ‘Understanding sovereignty through Kelsen/Schmitt’, Review of International Studies, 33:3 (2007), p. 530CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

49 Slaughter, Anne-Marie, ‘Liberal International Relations theory and international economic law’, American University International Law Review, 10:2 (1995), p. 742Google Scholar.

50 Benhabib, Seyla, ‘The return of political theology: The scarf affair in comparative constitutional perspective in France, Germany and Turkey’, Philosophy and Social Criticism, 36:3–4 (2010), p. 455CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

51 Ibid., p. 457.

52 Niebuhr, Reinhold, Moral Man and Immoral Society: A Study in Ethics and Politics (London: Continuum, 2005), p. 57Google Scholar.

53 Odysseos, Louiza and Petito, Fabio, ‘Introducing the international theory of Carl Schmitt: International law, International Relations, and the present global predicament(s)’, Leiden Journal of International Law, 19 (2006), p. 2CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

54 Schmitt, Carl, The Concept of the Political, ed. Schwab, G. (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1996), p. 23Google Scholar.

55 Ibid., p. 37.

56 Ibid., p. 61.

57 Ibid., p. 65.

58 Ibid., p. 79.

59 Schmitt, Carl, Writings on War, ed. Nunan, T. (Cambridge: Polity Press, 2011), p. 31Google Scholar.

60 Ibid., p. 36.

61 Carl Schmitt, Land and Sea (New York: Telos, 2015).

62 Schmitt, Writings on War, p. 41.

63 Schmitt, Carl, The Nomos of the Earth, ed. Ulmen, G. L. (New York: Telos, 2003), p. 37Google Scholar.

64 Ibid., p. 39.

65 Elden, Stuart, ‘Reading Schmitt geopolitically: Nomos, territory and Großrau’, Radical Philosophy, 161 (2010), p. 18Google Scholar.

66 Hobson, John M., ‘Is critical theory always for the white West and for Western imperialism? Beyond Westphalian towards a post-racist critical IR’, Review of International Studies, 33 (2007), p. 94CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

67 Mouffe, The Challenge of Carl Schmitt.

68 Mouffe, Chantal, ‘Democracy in a multipolar world’, Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 37:3 (2009), pp. 549–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

69 Mouffe, The Challenge of Carl Schmitt, p. 82.

70 Schmitt, The Nomos of the Earth, p. 82.

71 Ibid., p. 86.

72 Phillips, Anne, War, Religion and Empire: The Transformation of International Orders (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011), p. 24Google Scholar.

73 Schmitt, The Nomos of the Earth, p. 86.

74 Ibid., pp. 86–7.

75 Ibid., p. 90.

76 Ibid., p. 41.

77 Slomp, Gabriella, Carl Schmitt and the Politics of Hostility, Violence and Terror (Basingstoke: Palgrave, 2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

78 Ibid., p. 135.

79 Odysseos, Louiza, ‘Dangerous ontologies: The ethos of survival and ethical theorizing in International Relations’, Review of International Studies, 28:2 (2002), p. 412CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

80 Schmitt, Carl, Constitutional Theory (Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2008), p. 381CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

81 Ibid., p. 389.

82 Ibid., p. 394.

83 Ibid.

84 Benhabib, ‘The return of political theology’, p. 454.

85 Rengger, Nicholas, ‘On theology and international relations: World politics beyond the empty sky’, International Relations, 27:2 (2013), p. 143CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

86 Ibid., p. 153.

87 Schmitt, Political Theology, p. 51.

88 Elden, Reading Schmitt Geopolitically, p. 24.

89 Sorel, Georges, Reflections on Violence (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999), p. 116CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

90 Fahy, Jeffrey and Haynes, John, ‘Introduction: Interfaith on the world stage’, The Review of Faith & International Affairs, 16:3 (2018), pp. 1–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

91 Ikenberry, G. John, ‘The end of liberal international order?’, International Affairs, 94:1 (2018), p. 9CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

92 Ibid.

93 Ibid., p. 12.

94 Booth, Ken, ‘Human wrongs and International Relations’, International Affairs, 71:1 (1995), p. 104CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

95 Kubálková, Vendulka, ‘Towards an International Political Theology’, Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 29:3 (2000), p. 682Google Scholar.

96 Bell, Daniel S. A., ‘Empire and International Relations in Victorian political thought’, The Historical Journal, 49:1 (2006), p. 287CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

97 Thomas, Scott M., ‘Living critically and “living faithfully” in a global age: Justice, emancipation and the political theology of International Relations’, Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 39:2 (2010), p. 509Google Scholar.

98 Morgenthau, Politics Among Nations, p. 312.

99 Paipais, Vassilios, ‘First image revisited: Human nature, original sin and international relations’, Journal of International Relations and Development, 22:2 (2016), pp. 364–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

100 Wendt, Alexander J. and Duvall, Raymond, ‘Sovereignty and the UFO’, Political Theory, 36:4 (2008), p. 607CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

101 Ibid., p. 607.

102 Morgenthau, Politics Among Nations, p. 338.