Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T17:02:13.280Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Being-in-the-world of the international

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 February 2015

GERARD VAN DER REE
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Even though the international permeates our daily lives in many ways, it rarely discloses itself as part of our everyday engagements. Drawing from Martin Heidegger’s phenomenology, this article seeks to explore the ways in which the international remains hidden to, as well as the ways in which the international can become part of, our being-in-the-world. Additionally, it will show the terms in which International Relations (IR) scholars can disclose the world of the international, and what the implications of that ‘knowing’ are for the discipline. Finally, it will explore the possibilities and limitations of a Heidegerrian phenomenology for a social science such as IR.

Type
Articles
Information
Review of International Studies , Volume 41 , Issue 4 , October 2015 , pp. 781 - 798
Copyright
© 2015 British International Studies Association 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

I would like to thank Stijn Bollinger, Patrick Thaddeus Jackson, Marina Lazëri, and the peer reviewers for their valuable feedback.

References

1 Adler, Emmanuel and Pouliot, Vincent, ‘International Practices’, International Theory, 3:1 (2011), pp. 1–36 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

2 Dillon, Michael, Politics of Security: Towards a Political Philosophy of Continental Thought (Abingdon: Routledge, 1996), pp. 36–48 Google Scholar; Odysseos, Louiza, ‘Radical phenomenology, ontology, and international political theory’, Alternatives, 27 (2002), pp. 373–405 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

3 Dillon, Politics of Security.

4 Seckenelgin, Hakan, The Environment and International Relations: International Fisheries, Heidegger and Social Method (Abingdon: Routledge, 2006)Google Scholar.

5 Odysseos, Louiza, The Subject of Coexistence: Otherness in International Relations (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2007)Google Scholar.

6 Ibid., p. 42.

7 Ibid., p. 43.

8 Ibid., p. 30.

9 Heidegger, Martin, Being and Time (New York: Harper & Row, 2009 [orig. pub 1962]), p. 56CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

10 Blattner, William, Heidegger’s Being and Time: a Reader’s Guide (London: Continuum International Publishing Group, 2006), p. 20Google Scholar.

11 Heidegger, Martin, ‘Letter on humanism’, in William McNeil (ed.), Pathmarks (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998), pp. 239–276 CrossRefGoogle Scholar, 240.

12 Ibid., p. 272.

13 Weiner, James, Tree Leaf Talk: A Heidegerrian Anthropology (Oxford: Berg, 2001)Google Scholar.

14 Howarth, David, ‘Towards a Heideggerian social science: Heidegger, Kisiel and Weiner on the limits of anthropological discourse’, Anthropological Theory, 4 (2004), p. 234 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

15 Heidegger, , Being and Time, pp. 190–191 Google Scholar.

16 Ibid., p. 57.

17 This categorisation serves clarification and simplification purposes only, since in the context of this article there is little room to expand on the complexity of Heidegger’s analysis. The three themes mentioned here should be understood as interconnected, mutually constitutive, and nonhierarchical.

18 Blattner, , Heidegger’s Being and Time, p. 78 Google Scholar.

19 Odysseos, , The Subject of Coexistence, p. 60 Google Scholar.

20 Heidegger, , Being and Time, p. 69 Google Scholar.

21 Ibid., p. 27.

22 Ibid., p. 152; Odysseos, , The Subject of Coexistence, p. 43 Google Scholar.

23 Dahlstrom, Daniel, ‘Heidegger’s method: Philosophical concepts as formal indications’, Review of Metaphysics, 47 (2004), pp. 775–795 Google Scholar.

24 King, Matthew, ‘Heidegger’s etymological method: Discovering being by recovering the richness of the world’, Philosophy Today, 51:3 (2007), pp. 278–289 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

25 Walker, Rob, Inside / Outside (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993)Google Scholar.

26 Dillon, , Politics of Security, pp. 43–52 Google Scholar.

27 Blattner, , Heidegger’s Being and Time, p. 75 Google Scholar.

28 Walker, R. B. J., After the Globe, Before the World (Abingdon: Routledge, 2010), pp. 19–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

29 Enloe, Cynthia, Bananas, Beaches, and Bases (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1989), p. 196Google Scholar.

30 Heidegger, , Being and Time, p. 116 Google Scholar.

31 Dreyfus, Hubert, Being-in-the-World: a Commentary on Heidegger’s Being and Time, Division (Cambridge: MIT Press, 1991), pp. 70–82Google Scholar.

32 Dillon, , Politics of Security, p. 160 Google Scholar.

33 Beerends, Hans, Weg met Pinochet: een Kwart Eeuw Solidariteit met Chili (Amsterdam: Instituut voor Publiek en Politiek, 1998), p. 65Google Scholar.

34 Mitchell, Andrew, ‘Heidegger and terrorism’, Research in Phenomenology, 35:1 (2005), pp. 181–218 CrossRefGoogle Scholar, 198.

35 Mitchell, , ‘Heidegger and terrorism’, p. 209 Google Scholar.

36 Heidegger, Martin, ‘Letter on humanism’, in David Farrell Krell (ed.), Basic Writings (New York: Harper & Row, 1977), p. 239Google Scholar.

37 Dreyfus, , Being-in-the-World, p. 192 Google Scholar.

38 Heidegger, , ‘Letter on humanism’, p. 196 Google Scholar.

39 Jackson, Patrick Thaddeus, The Conduct of Inquiry in International Relations: Philosophy of Science and its Implications for the Study of World Politics (Abingdon: Routledge, 2011), p. 176Google Scholar.

40 Enloe, Bananas, Beaches, and Bases.

41 Heidegger, , Being and Time, p. 176 Google Scholar, emphasis in the original.

42 Ricoeur, Paul, ‘The Bible and the imagination’, in Marc Wallace (ed.), Figuring the Sacred: Religion, Narrative and Imagination (Minneapolis: Augsburg Fortress, 1995), p. 144Google Scholar.

43 Walker, , Inside/Outside, pp. 6–14 Google Scholar.

44 Heidegger, , Being and Time, pp. 154–155 Google Scholar.

45 Augé, Marc, Non-Places: Introduction to an Anthropology of Supermodernity (London: Verso, 1995), pp. 75–115Google Scholar.

46 Aaltola, Mika, ‘The international airport: the hub-and-spoke pedagogy of the American Empire’, Global Networks, 5:3 (2005), pp. 261–278 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

47 Inayatullah, and Blaney, , International Relations and the Problem of Difference, pp. 21–45 Google Scholar.

48 Bauman, Zygmunt, Postmodern Ethics (Malden: Blackwell, 1993), p. 145Google Scholar.

49 Odysseos, , The Subject of Coexistence, pp. 86–90 Google Scholar.

50 Heidegger, , Being and Time, p. 200 Google Scholar.

51 Ibid., p. 413.

52 Heidegger, , Being and Time, p. 200 Google Scholar.

53 Ibid.

54 Ibid., p. 189.

55 Ibid., p.193.

56 Blattner, , Heidegger’s Being and Time, p. 97 Google Scholar.

57 Brown, Theodore, Making Truth: Metaphor in Science (Champaign: University of Illinois, 2003)Google Scholar.

58 See Suganami, Hidemi, The Domestic Analogy and World Order Proposals (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

59 Latour, Bruno and Woolgar, Steve, Laboratory Life: the Construction of Scientific Facts (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1979)Google Scholar; Gilbert, G. Nigel and Mulkay, Michael, Opening Pandora’s Box: a Sociological Analysis of Scientists’ Discourse (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984)Google Scholar.

60 Carman, Taylor, Heidegger’s Analytic: Interpretation, Discourse, and Authenticity in Being in Time (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003), pp. 210–211 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

61 Heidegger, , Being and Time, pp. 413–414 Google Scholar.

62 King, Gary, Keohane, Robert, and Verba, Sidney, Designing Social Inquiry: Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1994), p. 7CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

63 Heidegger, , Being and Time, p. 88 Google Scholar.

64 Ibid., p. 89.

65 Ibid., p. 414.

66 Jackson, , The Conduct of Inquiry in International Relations, pp. 8–9 Google Scholar.

67 Hollis, Martin and Smith, Steve, Explaining and Understanding International Relations (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1991), p. 4Google Scholar.

68 Dreyfus, , Being-in-the-World, p. 207 Google Scholar.

69 Diamond, Jared, Guns, Germs, and Steel: the Fates of Human Societies (New York: W.W. Norton & Company, 1999)Google Scholar.

70 Heidegger, , Being and Time, p. 201 Google Scholar.

71 Dreyfus, , Being-in-the-World, pp. 118–121 Google Scholar.

72 Bourdieu, Pierre, Science of Science and Reflexivity (Cambridge: Polity Press, 2001), pp. 21–31 Google Scholar.

73 Heidegger, , Being and Time, pp. 414–456 Google Scholar.

74 Smith, Steve, ‘Positivism and beyond’, in Steve Smith, Ken Booth, and Marysia Zalewski (eds), International Theory: Positivism and Beyond (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996), pp. 11–46 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

75 Wight, Colin, Agents, Structures and International Relations: Politics as Ontology (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006), p. 3CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

76 Heidegger, , Being and Time, p. 191 Google Scholar.

77 Patomäki, Heikki and Wight, Colin, ‘After postpositivism? The promises of critical realism’, International Studies Quarterly, 44:2 (2000), pp. 213–237CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

78 Heidegger, , Being and Time, p. 62 Google Scholar.

79 Ibid., p. 99.

80 Ibid., p. 122.

81 Ibid., p. 167.