Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-03T19:14:58.705Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Law, Death, and Heirs in the Renaissance: Repudiation of Inheritance in Florence

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2018

Thomas Kuehn
Thomas Kuehn*
Affiliation:
Clemson University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In traditional Europe, social reproduction rested in good part on inheritance. Property and status passed from generation to generation according to varying schemes of transmission tied to notions of blood descent, filiation, lineage, and affinity. Tracing changes in these schemes has been one of the central concerns of social history. Much of Renaissance social history has also gravitated around inheritance. By establishing magistracies like the Ufficiali dei Pupilli to oversee legal guardianship of minors and providing a public fund for dowries, the Monte delle doti, such cities as Florence indicated how important familial continuity was. Thanks to the work done by David Herlihy and Christiane Klapisch-Zuber, William Kent, and others for Florence; of Stanley Chojnacki and others for Venice; and of yet other scholars for other cities, we are in a much better position to understand how important and complex inheritance was, how generally successful it was in preserving property in the hands of a narrow elite, to what degree marital and other practices were geared to inheritance strategies, and how difficult those strategies could be to carry out in the face of demographic and economic realities.

Type
Studies
Information
Renaissance Quarterly , Volume 45 , Issue 3 , Fall 1992 , pp. 484 - 516
Copyright
Copyright © Renaissance Society of America 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bellomo, Manlio. “Erede e eredità (diritto intermedio).” Enciclopedia del diritto. Vol. 15: 184-95.Google Scholar
Bellomo, Manlio. Problemi di diritto familiare nell'età dei commit: Beni patertii e ‘pars filii'. Milan, 1968.Google Scholar
Bellomo, Manlio. Ricerche sui rapporti patrimonial! tra coniuigi: Contributo alia storia della famiglia medievale. Milan, 1961.Google Scholar
Berengo, Marino. Nobili e mercanti nella Lucca del Cinquecetito. Turin, 1965.Google Scholar
Besta, Enrico. Le succession! nella storia del diritto italiano. Milan, 1936. Rpt., Milan, 1961.Google Scholar
Buckland, W. W. A Text-Book of Roman Law from Augustus to Justinian. 3d ed. Ed. Peter, Stein. Cambridge, Eng., 1966.Google Scholar
Casey, James. The History of the Family. Oxford, Eng., 1989.Google Scholar
Chojnacki, Stanley. “Dowries and Kinsmen in Early Renaissance Venice.” Journal of Interdisciplinary History 5 (1975): 571–600.Google Scholar
Chojnacki, Stanley. “Patrician Women in Early Renaissance Venice.” Studies in the Renaissance 21(1974): 176–203.Google Scholar
Cohn, Samuel Kline, Jr. Death and Property in Siena, 1205-1800: Strategies for the Afterlife. Baltimore, 1989.Google Scholar
Duby, Georges. The Knight, the Lady, and the Priest: The Making of Modern Marriage in Medieval France. Trans. Barbara, Bray. New York, 1983.Google Scholar
Epstein, Steven. Wills and Wealth in Medieval Genoa, 1150-1250. Cambridge, MA, 1984.Google Scholar
Flandrin, Jean-Louis. Families in Former Times. Trans. Richard, Southern. Cambridge, Eng., 1979.Google Scholar
Goody, Jack. The Development of the Family and Marriage in Europe. Cambridge, Eng., 1983.Google Scholar
Goody, Jack, Joan, Thirsk, and Thompson, E. P., eds. Family and Inheritance: Rural Society in Western Europe, 1200-1800. Cambridge, Eng., 1976.Google Scholar
Grossi, Paolo. “La proprietà e le proprietà nell'officina dello storico.” In La proprieta e le proprietà, ed. Ennio, Cortese, 205-72. Milan, 1988.Google Scholar
Grossi, Paolo. Le situazioni reali nell'esperienza giuridica medievale. Padua, 1968.Google Scholar
Herlihy, David. Medieval Households. Cambridge, MA, 1985.Google Scholar
Herlihy, David, and Christiane, Klapisch-Zuber. Les toscans et leurs families. Paris, 1978.Google Scholar
Hughes, Diane Owen. “Struttura familiare e sistemi di successione ereditaria nei testamenti dell'Europa medievale.” Quaderni storici 33 (1976): 929-52.Google Scholar
Kent, Francis William. Household and Lineage in Renaissance Florence: The Family Life of the Capponi, Ginori, and Rucellai. Princeton, NJ, 1977.Google Scholar
Kirshner, Julius. “Wives’ Claims against Insolvent Husbands in Late Medieval Italy.” In Women of the Medieval World, ed. Julius, Kirshner and Suzanne F., Wempel, 256–303. Oxford, Eng., 1985.Google Scholar
Kuehn, Thomas. “Arbitration and Law in Renaissance Florence.” Renaissance and Reformation, n.s. 11 (1987): 289-319.Google Scholar
Kuehn, Thomas. “Conflicting Conceptions of Property in Quattrocento Florence: A Dispute over Ownership in 1425-26.” Quaderni fiorentini per la storia del pensiero giuridico moderno 14 (1985): 303-72.Google Scholar
Kuehn, Thomas. “ ‘Cum Consensu Mundualdi': Legal Guardianship of Women in Quattrocento Florence.” Viator 13 (1982 2): 309-33.Google Scholar
Kuehn, Thomas. Emancipation in Late Medieval Florence. New Brunswick, NJ, 1982'.Google Scholar
Kuehn, Thomas. “Famiglia nel diritto e diritto nelle famiglie.” In Palazzo Strozzi: Melà millenio, 1489-1989. Atti del Convegno di Studi, Firenze, 3–6 luglio 1989, 108-25. Rome, 1991.Google Scholar
Kuehn, Thomas. “ ‘Multorum Fraudibus Occurrere': Legislation andjurisprudential Interpretation Concerning Fraud and Liability in Quattrocento Florence.” Studi senesi 93 (1981): 309-50.Google Scholar
Leicht, P. S. Diritti reali e di succcssione. Vol. 2 of Storia del diritto italiano: II diritto privato. Milan, 1960.Google Scholar
Leicht, P. S. Martines,Lauro. Lawyers and Statecraft in Renaissance Florence. Princeton, NJ, 1968.Google Scholar
Leicht, P. S.. The Social World of the Florentine Humanists, 1390-1460. Princeton, NJ, 1963.Google Scholar
Mayali, Laurent. Droit savant et coutumes: L'exclusion des filles dott'es xiième-xvème siècles. Frankfurt am Main, 1987.Google Scholar
Mazzi, Maria Serena, and Sergio, Raveggi. Gli uomini e le cose nelle campagne fiorentine del Quattrocento. Florence, 1983.Google Scholar
Mitterauer, Michael, and Reinhard, Sieder. The European Family: Patriarchy to Partnership from the Middle Ages to the Present. Trans. Karla, Oosterveen and Manfred, Horzinger. Chicago, 1982.Google Scholar
Mommsen, T., Krueger, P., and Schoell, R., eds. Corpus iuris civilis. 3 vols. Berlin, 1928-29.Google Scholar
Nicolai, Franco. Laformazione del diritto successorio negli statuti comunali del territorio lombardo-tosco. Milan, 1940.Google Scholar
Plakans, Andrejs. Kinship in the Past: An Anthropology of European Family Life, 1500- 1900. Oxford, Eng., 1984.Google Scholar
Romano, Andrea. Le sostituzioni ereditarie nell'inedita ‘Repetitio de substitionibus’ di Raniero Arsendi. Catania, 1977.Google Scholar
Segalen, Martine. Historical Anthropology of the Family. Trans. Whitehouse, J. C. and Matthews, Sarah. Cambridge, Eng., 1986.Google Scholar
Tamassia, Nino. Lafamiglia italiana nei secoli decimoquinto e decimosesto. Milan, 1910.Google Scholar
Vismara, Giulio. Famiglia e successioni nella storia del diritto. Rome, 1970.Google Scholar