Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T13:00:21.628Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Omnisubjectivity and the problem of creepy divine emotions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 June 2020

R. T. MULLINS Open the ORCID record for R. T. MULLINS [Opens in a new window]
R. T. MULLINS*
Affiliation:
Institute for Advanced Studies in the Humanities, University of Edinburgh, Hope Park Square, EdinburghEH8 9NW, UK
*
e-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Over the past century, divine passibility has become the majority view within Christian theology and philosophy of religion. Yet it faces a serious objection from proponents of impassibility that I shall call the Problem of Creepy Emotions. In this article, I shall develop the objection in detail, and explore two ways for divine passibilists to answer this objection. I shall do this in several steps. First, I will offer some brief historical remarks to help readers understand that divine empathy is the watershed issue in the debate over impassibility and passibility. In particular, impassibility denies that God has empathy, whereas passibility affirms that God has empathy. Second, I provide definitions of important concepts for this debate such as impassibility, passibility, emotions, and empathy. I shall articulate Linda Zagzebski's recent account of passibility called omnisubjectivity, or perfect empathy. Third, I shall examine the Problem of Creepy Emotions that arises from the affirmation that God has perfect empathy. Fourth, I shall explore two different strategies that divine passibility can employ to avoid the Problem of Creepy Emotions.

Type
Original Article
Information
Religious Studies , Volume 58 , Issue 1 , March 2022 , pp. 162 - 179
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anselm, (2008) Proslogion, in Anselm of Canterbury: The Major Works, Davies, Brian & Evans, G. R. (eds) (New York: Oxford University Press), 82–104.Google Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas (1934) Summa Contra Gentiles, English Dominican Fathers (trs) (London: Burns, Oates, & Washbourne).Google Scholar
Arminius, James (1986) The Works of James Arminius, II, Nichols, James (tr.) (London: Baker Book House).Google Scholar
Blankenhorn, Bernhard (2016) ‘Response to Linda Zagzebski's “Omnisubjectivity: why it is a divine attribute”’, Nova et Vetera, 14, 451–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brasnett, Bertrand R. (1928) The Suffering of the Impassible God (London: Macmillan).Google Scholar
Creel, Richard E. (1986) Divine Impassibility: An Essay in Philosophical Theology (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Creel, Richard E. (1997) ‘Immutability and impassibility’, in Quinn, Philip L. & Taliaferro, Charles (eds) A Companion to Philosophy of Religion (Malden: Blackwell), 322–328.Google Scholar
Davies, Brian (2006) The Reality of God and the Problem of Evil (London: Continuum).Google Scholar
Dolezal, James E. (2019) ‘Strong impassibility’, in Matz, Robert J. & Chadwick Thornhill, A. (eds) Divine Impassibility: Four Views of God's Emotions and Suffering (Downers Grove: IVP Academic), 13–37.Google Scholar
Fiddes, Paul (1988) The Creative Suffering of God (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Hartshorne, Charles (1964) Man's Vision of God and the Logic of Theism (Hamden: Archon Books).Google Scholar
Helm, Paul (1990) ‘Impossibility of divine passibility’, in de S. Cameron, Nigel M. (ed.) The Power and Weakness of God (Edinburgh: Rutherford House Books).Google Scholar
Helm, Paul (2014) ‘Impassionedness and “so-called classical theism” ’, in Clarke, Anthony & Moore, Andrew (eds) Within the Love of God: Essays on the Doctrine of God in Honour of Paul S. Fiddes (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 144–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herdt, Jennifer A. (2001) ‘The rise of sympathy and the question of divine suffering’, Journal of Religious Ethics, 29, 367–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kauppinen, Antti (2017) ‘Empathy and moral judgment’, in Maibom, Heidi L. (ed.) The Routledge Handbook of Philosophy of Empathy (London: Routledge), 215–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kennett, Jeanette (2017) ‘Empathy and psychopathology’, in Maibom, Heidi L. (ed.) The Routledge Handbook of Philosophy of Empathy (London: Routledge), 364–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leftow, Brian (2012) ‘God's impassibility, immutability, and eternality’, in Davies, Brian (ed.) The Oxford Handbook of Aquinas (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 173–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matz, Robert J., & Thornhill, Chadwick (2019) Divine Impassibility: Four Views of God's Emotions and Suffering (Downers Grove: IVP Academic).Google Scholar
McCabe, Herbert (1987) God Matters (London: Cassell).Google Scholar
McConnell, Francis J. (1924) Is God Limited? (London: Williams & Norgate).Google Scholar
McConnell, Francis J. (1927) The Christlike God: A Survey of the Divine Attributes From the Christian Point of View (New York: The Abingdon Press).Google Scholar
McIntosh, Chad (2015) ‘Linda Zagzebski, omnisubjectivity: a defense of a divine attribute’, European Journal for Philosophy of Religion, 7, 254–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moltmann, Jürgen (2014) ‘The passibility or impassibility of God’, in Clarke, Anthony & Moore, Andrew (eds) Within the Love of God: Essays on the Doctrine of God in Honour of Paul S. Fiddes (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 108–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mozley, J. K. (1926) The Impassibility of God: A Survey of Christian Thought (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Mullins, R. T. (2018) ‘Why can't the impassible God suffer?’, TheoLogica, 2, 3–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nagasawa, Yujin (2017) Maximal God: A New Defense of Perfect Being Theism (Oxford: Oxford University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nussbaum, Martha C. (2001) Upheavals of Thought: Intelligence of Emotions (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oord, Thomas Jay (2019) God Can't! (New York City: SacraSage Press).Google Scholar
Pawl, Timothy (2016) In Defense of Conciliar Christology: A Philosophical Essay (Oxford: Oxford University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pink, Arthur W. (1975) The Attributes of God (Grand Rapids: Baker Books).Google Scholar
Randles, Marshall (1900) The Blessed God: Impassibility (London: Charles H. Kelly).Google Scholar
Roberts, Robert C. (2013) Emotions in the Moral Life (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rogers, Katherin A. (2000) Perfect Being Theology (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press).Google Scholar
Scrutton, Anastasia (2011) Thinking Through Feeling: God, Emotion and Passibility (New York: Continuum).Google Scholar
Scrutton, Anastasia (2013) ‘Divine passibility: God and emotion’, Philosophy Compass, 8, 866–874.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shedd, W. G. T. (1888) Dogmatic Theology, I (New York: Charles Scribner's Sons).Google Scholar
Shoemaker, David (2017) ‘Empathy and moral responsibility’, in Maibom, Heidi L. (ed.) The Routledge Handbook of Philosophy of Empathy (London: Routledge), 242–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silverman, Eric (2013) ‘Impassibility and divine love’, in Diller, Jeanine & Kasher, Asa (eds) Models of God and Alternative Ultimate Realities (New York: Springer), 165–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Mark S. (2012) ‘Only the non-suffering God can help: recovering the glory of divine impassibility’, Churchman, 126, 147–162.Google Scholar
Soteriou, Matthew (2018) ‘The ontology of emotion’, in Naar, Hichem & Teroni, Fabrice (eds) The Ontology of Emotions (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 71–89.Google Scholar
Spaulding, Shannon (2017) ‘Cognitive empathy’, in Maibom, Heidi L. (ed.) The Routledge Handbook of Philosophy of Empathy (London: Routledge), 13–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ta, Vivian P., & Ickes, William (2017) ‘Empathic accuracy’, in Maibom, Heidi L. (ed.) The Routledge Handbook of Philosophy of Empathy (London: Routledge), 353–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taliaferro, Charles (1989) ‘The passibility of God’, Religious Studies, 25, 217–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Todd, Cain (2014) ‘Emotion and value’, Philosophy Compass, 9, 702–712.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ussher, James (1645) A Body of Divinitie, or the Summe and Substance of Christian Religion (London: M. F.).Google Scholar
Ward, Keith (2017) The Christian Idea of God: A Philosophical Foundation for Faith (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weinandy, Thomas G. (2000) Does God Suffer? (Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wittmann, Tyler (2016) ‘The logic of divine blessedness and the salvific teleology of Christ’, International Journal of Systematic Theology, 18, 132–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zagzebski, Linda (2008) ‘Omnisubjectivity’, in Kvanvig, Jonathan L. (ed.) Oxford Studies in Philosophy of Religion (New York: Oxford University Press), 231–248.Google Scholar
Zagzebski, Linda (2013) Omnisubjectivity: A Defense of a Divine Attribute (Milwaukee: Marquette University Press).Google Scholar
Zagzebski, Linda (2016) ‘Omnisubjectivity: why it is a divine attribute’, Nova et Vetera, 14, 435–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zahavi, Dan (2017) ‘Phenomenology, empathy, and mindreading’, in Maibom, Heidi L. (ed.) The Routledge Handbook of Philosophy of Empathy (London: Routledge), 33–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zanchius, Girolamo (1601) Life Everlasting: Or, The True Knowledge of One Jehovah, Three Elohim, and Jesus Immanuel (Cambridge: John Legat).Google Scholar