Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-06T02:42:06.926Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Avicennian DDS: the divine essence, knowledge, and power

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2025

Davlat Dadikhuda Open the ORCID record for Davlat Dadikhuda [Opens in a new window]
Davlat Dadikhuda*
Affiliation:
Munich School of Ancient Philosophy, LMU, Munich, Germany
*
Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In the Islamic tradition, there’s a long standing controversy over the relationship between God’s attributes and His essence, giving rise to diverse theories with significant theological implications. In one respect, these views are broadly categorizable into three: A1, the doctrine of divine complexity (DDC), A2, the doctrine of divine simplicity (DDS), and B, the doctrine of divine anonymity (DDA). The entry focuses on DDS, specifically explaining the Avicennian version, and defends it against some objections from some recent DDC proponents.

Keywords

divine simplicityAvicennadivine essenceknowledgepowerIslamic philosophy
Type
Original Article
Information
Religious Studies , First View , pp. 1 - 24
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Al-Baghdadi, AA-Q (1928) Kitab Usul al-Din. Istanbul: Matba’a al-Dawla.Google Scholar
Al-Ghazālī (2021) Al-Iqtisad Fi al-I’tiqad. Annotated by A. M. Adnan Al-Sharqawi. Jeddah: Dar al-Minhaj.Google Scholar
Al-Jurjānī, SS (n.d.) Sharḥ al-Mawāqif. Lithograph.Google Scholar
Al-Sijistānī, AY (2000) Kitab al-Iftikhar. Edited with notes and commentary by Ismail K. Poonawala. Beirut: Dar al-Gharb al-Islami.Google Scholar
Al-Sijistānī, AY (2011) Kitāb al-Maqālīd al-Malakūtiyya. Edited and annotated by Ismail K. Poonawala. Beirut: Dar al-Gharb al-Islami.Google Scholar
Avicenna (1981) Al-Risāla Al-῾arshiyya Fī Ḥaqā᾿iq Al-tawḥīd Wa Iṭhbāt Al-nubuwwa, Hilāl, I (eds). Cairo.Google Scholar
Avicenna (1984) Al-Mabda’ Wa al-Ma῾ad, Nurani, A (ed). Tehran: Danishgah-i Tihran.Google Scholar
Avicenna (1992) Al-Mubāḥathāt, Bidarfar, M (ed). Qom: Intisharat-i Bidar.Google Scholar
Avicenna (2013) Al-Taʻlīqāt, Mūsaviyān, H (ed). Tehran: Muʼassasah-ʼi Pizhūhishī‐i Ḥikmat va Falsafah-ʾi Īrān.Google Scholar
Beebe, JR (2018) Brower and Saenz on divine truthmaker simplicity. Faith and Philosophy 35(4), 473–484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brower, JE (2008) Making sense of divine simplicity. Faith and Philosophy 25(1), 3–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brower, JE (2009) Simplicity and Aseity. In Flint, TP and Rea, M (eds), Oxford Handbook of Philosophical Theology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 105–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dolezal, J (2011) God without Parts: Divine Simplicity and the Metaphysics of God’s Absoluteness. Eugene, OR: Pickwick Publications.Google Scholar
Firuzjai, YK (2018) Avicenna’s theory of the unity of attributes: Conceptual unity or semantic unity? Isra Hikmat 32, 65–83.Google Scholar
Frank, R (1982) Attribute, attribution, and being: Three Islamic views. In Morewedge, P (ed), Philosophies of Existence, Ancient and Medieval. New York, NY: Fordham University Press, 67–90.Google Scholar
Greig, J (2020) The First Principle in Late Neoplatonism: A Study of the One’s Causality in Proclus and Damascius. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Hasker, W (2016) Is divine simplicity a mistake? American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 90(4), 699–725.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kars, A (2019) Unsaying God: Negative Theology in Medieval Islam. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mousavian, SN (2022) Avicenna on the semantics of Ma‘nā. In Thörnqvist, CT and Toivanen, J (eds), Forms of Representation in the Aristotelian Tradition: Volume Three: Concept Formation. Leiden: Brill, 95–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muhtaroğlu, N (2020) Plantinga and Ash‘arites on divine simplicity. Kader 18(2), 488–499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mulla Sadra (1981) Al-Hikma al-mutaʽaliyya fi’l-asfar Al-arbaʽa. Beirut: Dar Ihya al-Turath al-Arabi.Google Scholar
Prawl, T (2019) In Defense of Divine Truthmaker Simplicity. Res Philosophica 96(1), 63–75.Google Scholar
Qhaemi, SR and Ahmadvand, MA (2020) Investigating the ascription of the theory of Niyaba to the Mu’tazila. Islamic Denominations 7(13), 36–60.Google Scholar
Rogers, KA (2000) Perfect Being Theology. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Sabuni, NA-D (2020) An Introduction to Islamic Theology (Al-bidayah Fi Usul al-Din). Translated and annotated by Faraz A. Khan. Sandala: no publisher.Google Scholar
Saeedimehr, M (2007) Divine simplicity. Topoi 26(2), 217–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saenz, NB (2014) Against divine truthmaker simplicity. Faith and Philosophy 31(4), 460–474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saenz, NB (2021) Still Against Divine Truthmaker Simplicity. Faith and Philosophy 38(3), .Google Scholar
Schärtl, T (2018) Divine simplicity. European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 10(2), 51–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taftazani, SA-D (2020) Sharḥ Al-ʿAqā’id Al-nasafiyya. Edited and annotated by AM Adnan Al-Sharqawi. Damascus: Dar al-Fatwa.Google Scholar
Taymiyya, Taqi al-Din (2000) Al-Risala al-Safadiyya, Isma’il, MHMH (eds). Beirut: Dar al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyya.Google Scholar
Vallicella, WF (1992) Divine simplicity. Faith and Philosophy 9(4), 508–525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zabihi, M (2005) The intentional and extensional unity of the divine essence and attributes in Avicenna’s view. Journal of Religious Thought of Shiraz University 13, 29–46.Google Scholar