Article contents
Athens and Jerusalem1
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 24 October 2008
Extract
This paper has four roots.
First, an increasing dissatisfaction over the gulf between classical and theological studies. Christianity in origin, after all, is a part of the story of the ancient world, and has to be seen in context. The context is complex: it is Judaea as part of the Hellenistic world under the rule of Rome: we ignore any part of that context at our peril. Classical scholars tend to be suspicious of those with theological interests: I was forbidden by an examining board of the University of London to set the first verse of St John's Gospel for comment in a paper on Greek philosophy: they were being doctrinaire, not I. But equally some theologians have neglected the disciplined study of the ancient world. It would not be so bad if they left the context out; but instead they offer windy generalisations, secondhand, ill-based and false. Some corrective is needed.
- Type
- Articles
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1972
References
page 1 note 1 Guthrie, W. K. C., The Greek Philosophers (London, 1950), pp. 71 ff.Google Scholar
page 4 note 1 For much of this see Lieberman, S., Greek in Jewish Palestine New York, 1942Google Scholar. Also Smith, M. in Bulletin of the John Rylands Library, 40 (1958), 473–512Google Scholar; Rozelaar, M. in Eshkolot, 1954, pp. 33–48.Google Scholar
page 5 note 1 See Tcherikover, V., Hellenistic Civilization and the Jews (Philadelphia and Jerusalem, 1959).Google Scholar
page 7 note 1 For these see Tcherikover, V., Hellenistic Civilization and the Jews, pp. 90–116 and notes.Google Scholar
page 8 note 1 I am tempted to quote an epigram of Professor C. F. Evans in discussion: ‘Jesus did not go to Balliol: nor did Plato.’
- 1
- Cited by