Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-08T00:37:36.065Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Haecceities, individuation and the Trinity: a reply to Keith Yandell

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 June 2002

RICHARD BRIAN DAVIS
RICHARD BRIAN DAVIS
Affiliation:
Tyndale College, 25 Ballyconnor Court, Toronto, M2M 4B3, Canada
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In this paper I reply to Keith Yandell's recent charge that Anselmian theists cannot also be Trinitarians. Yandell's case turns on the contention that it is impossible to individuate Trinitarian members, if they exist necessarily. Since the ranks of Anselmian Trinitarians includes the likes of Alvin Plantinga, Robert Adams, and Thomas Flint, Yandell's claim is of considerable interest and import. I argue, by contrast, that Anselmians can appeal to what Plantinga calls an essence or haecceity – a property essentially unique to an object – to distinguish Trinitarian members. I go on to show that the main Yandellian objection to this individuative strategy is not successful.

Type
Research Article
Information
Religious Studies , Volume 38 , Issue 2 , June 2002 , pp. 201 - 213
Copyright
© 2002 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)