Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T12:20:01.876Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Pouvoirs de marché et informations privées en équilibre général: la théorie peut-elle avoir un pouvoir prédictif?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 August 2016

Louis-André Gérard-Varet
Louis-André Gérard-Varet*
Affiliation:
GREQE, Ecole des Hautes Etudes en Sciences Societies, Marseille
Get access

Résumé

La théorie de l’équilibre général walrasien possède un pouvoir prédictif, du moins tant que l’on veut bien s’en tenir à des environnements en information complète, en l’absence de pouvoirs de marché et où il est connaissance commune que les marchés doivent s’équilibrer. On examine ici les difficultés qui surviennent dès que sont pris en considération des pouvoirs de marché ou des informations privées.

Summary

Summary

The Walrasian model of general equilibrium offers some predictive power, at least when the agents are completely informed about their environments, in the absence of market power and if it is common knowledge that the markets must clear. The present paper studies issues about how to integrate market powers or private informations.

Keywords

021026036021026036
Type
Research Article
Information
Recherches Économiques de Louvain/ Louvain Economic Review , Volume 55 , Issue 4 , 1989 , pp. 313 - 338
Copyright
Copyright © Université catholique de Louvain, Institut de recherches économiques et sociales 1989 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

Le présent document reprend un exposé présenté aux «Journées d’Etudes sur la Notion d’Equilibre» tenues à Louvain-la-Neuve, les 9 et 10 mai 1989. Je remercie A. Leroux et P. Mongin pour leurs commentaires.

References

BIBLIOGRAPHIE

Adorno, N. et Popper, K. R. (1986), De Vienne à Francfort – La querelle allemande des sciences sociales, Paris, Editions Complexe.Google Scholar
Arrow, K. J. (1959), Towards a Theory of Price Adjustment, in: Abramovitz, et al., (eds.), The Allocation of Economic Ressources, Stanford, Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Arrow, K. J. et Debreu, G. (1954), Existence of an Equilibrium for a Competitive Economy, Econometrica, vol. 22, pp. 265–290.Google Scholar
Arrow, K. J. et Hahn, F. H. (1972), General Competitive Analysis, San Francisco, Holden Day.Google Scholar
d’Aspremont, C., Dos Santos Ferreira, R. et Gérard-Varet, L. A. (1986), On Monopolistic Competition and Involuntary Unemployment, CORE D.P. n°8635, Université Catholique de Louvain Google Scholar
d’Aspremont, C., Cremer, J. J. et Gérard-Varet, L. A. (1989), Incentives and the Existence of Pareto Optimal Revelation Mechanisms, à paraître dans Journal of Economic Theory.Google Scholar
d’Aspremont, C., Dos Santos Ferreira, R. et Gérard-Varet, L. A. (1989a), Fondements stratégiques de l’équilibre en économie: coordination, rationalité individuelle et anticipations, Présenté au Colloque C. Gide, Strasbourg, 21 et 22 septembre 1989.Google Scholar
d’Aspremont, C., Dos Santos Ferreira, R. et Gérard-Varet, L. A., (1989b), Unemployment in an Extended Cournot Oligopoly Model, Oxford Economic Papers, vol. 41, pp. 490–505.Google Scholar
d’Aspremont, C. et Gérard-Varet, L. A. (1989a), Mécanismes de marchés, concurrence et contraintes d’incitations, in: Cartelier, J. (ed.), La Formation des Grandeurs Economiques, à paraître, Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
d’Aspremont, C. et Gérard-Varet, L. A (1989b), Utility Comparisons and Bayesian Incentives, Document de Travail GREQE, 89A03, avril.Google Scholar
Aumann, R. J. (1976), Agreeing to Disagree, Annals of Statistics, vol. 4, pp. 1236–1239.Google Scholar
Bertrand, J. (1883), Revue de la Théorie Mathématique de la Richesse Sociale et des Recherches sur les Principes Mathématiques de la Théorie des Richesses de Cournot, Journal des Savants, pp. 499–508.Google Scholar
Chamberlin, E. H. (1933), The Theory of Monopolistic Competition, Harvard, Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Cournot, A. A. (1838), Recherches sur les Principes Mathématiques de la Théorie des Richesses, Paris, Hachette.Google Scholar
Debreu, G. (1959), Theory of Value, New York, J. Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
Dierker, H. et Grodal, B. (1982), Non Existence of Cournot-Walras Equilibrium in a General Equilibrium Model with two Oligopolists, Bonn, University of Bonn, D.P. n°95.Google Scholar
Dubey, P. (1982), Price-quantity Strategic Market Games, Econometrica, vol. 50, pp. 111–126.Google Scholar
Edgeworth, P. Y. (1897), The Price Theory of Monopoly, in: Papers Relating to Political Economy, vol. 1, London, MacMillan, 1925, pp. 111–142.Google Scholar
Gabszewicz, J. J. et Vial, J. P. (1972), Olipopoly à la Cournot in a General Equilibrium Analysis, Journal of Economic Theory, vol. 14, pp. 381–400.Google Scholar
Gibbard, A. (1973), Manipulation for Voting Schemes. A General Result, Econometrica, vol. 41, pp. 587–602.Google Scholar
Green, J. et Laffont, J. J. (1979), Incentives in Public Decision Making, Amsterdam, North Holland.Google Scholar
Hahn, F. H. (1973), On the Notion of Equilibrium in Economics, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Harsanyi, J. C. (1967–68), Games with Incomplete Information Played by Bayesian Players, I, II, III, Management Science, vol. 14, pp. 159–183, 320–334, 486–502.Google Scholar
Halpern, J. Y. et Moses, Y. (1988), Knowledge and Common Knowledge in a Distributed Environment, IBM Research Report.Google Scholar
Hart, O. D. (1982), A Model of Imperfect Competition with Keynesian Features, Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 97, pp. 109–138.Google Scholar
Hart, O. D. (1985), Imperfect Competition in General Equilibrium: an Overview of Recent Work, in: Arrow, K. J. et Honkapohja, S. (eds.), Frontiers of Economics, Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Holmström, B. et Myerson, R. B. (1983), Efficient and Durable Decision Rules with Incomplete Information, Econometrica, vol. 51, pp. 1789–1813.Google Scholar
Hurwicz, L. J. (1960), Optimality and Informational Efficiency in Resource Allocation Processes, in: Arrow, K. J. Karlin, S. et Suppes, P. (eds.), Mathematical Methods in Social Sciences, Stanford, Stanford University Press, pp. 27–46.Google Scholar
Hurwicz, L. J. (1972), On Informationally Decentralized Systems, in: Radner, R. C. et Mcguire, B. (eds.), Decision and Organization, Amsterdam, North Holland, pp. 297–336.Google Scholar
Hurwicz, L. J. (1979), Outcome Functions Yielding Walrasian Allocations at Nash Equilibirum Points, Review of Economic Studies, vol. 46, pp. 1147–1174.Google Scholar
Kohlberg, E. et Mertens, J. F. (1986), On the Strategic Stability of Equilibria, Econometrica., vol. 54, pp. 1003–1037.Google Scholar
Laffont, J. J. et Laroque, G. (1976), Existence d’un équilibre général en concurrence imparfaite: une introduction, Econometrica, vol. 44, pp. 283–294.Google Scholar
Lewis, D. (1969), Convention, A Philosophical Study, Harvard, Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Marshak, T. et Selten, R. (1974), General Equilibrium with Price-making Firms, Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, Springer Verlag.Google Scholar
Nash, J. F. (1951), Non-cooperative Games, Annals of Mathematics, vol. 54, pp. 286–295.Google Scholar
Negishi, T. (1961), Monopolistic Competition and General Equilibrium, Review of Economic Studies, vol. 28, pp. 196–201.Google Scholar
Negishi, T. (1972), General Equilibrium and International Trade, Amsterdam, North Holland.Google Scholar
Nikaido, H. (1975), Monopolistic Competition and Effective Demand, Princeton, Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Popper, K. R. (1984), La logique de la découverte scientifique, Paris, Payot, (Traduction française de The Logic of Scientific Discovery, London, Hutchinson, 1959).Google Scholar
Postlewaite, A. et Roberts, J. (1976), The Incentives for Price-making Behaviour in Large Economies, Econometrica, vol. 44, pp. 115–128.Google Scholar
Roberts, K. (1980), The Limit Point of Monopolistic Competition, Journal of Economic Theory, vol. 22, pp. 256–278.Google Scholar
Robinson, J. (1933), The Economics of Imperfect Competition, London, MacMillan.Google Scholar
Samuelson, P. A. (1954), The Pure Theory of Public Expenditure, Review of Economics and Statistics, vol. 36, pp. 387–389.Google Scholar
Satterthwaite, M. (1975), Strategy-proofness and Arrow’s Conditions: Existence and Correspondance Theorem for Voting Procedures and Social Welfare Functions, Journal of Economic Theory, vol. 10, pp. 187–217.Google Scholar
Schmeidler, D. (1980), Walrasian Analysis via Strategic Outcome Functions, Econometrica, vol. 48, pp. 1585–1593.Google Scholar
Selten, R. (1975), Reexamination of the Perfectness Concept for Equilibrium Points in Extensive Games, International Journal of Game Theory, vol. 14, pp. 25–55.Google Scholar
Silvestre, J. (1977), A Model of General Equilibrium with Monopolistic Behaviour, Journal of Economic Theory, vol. 16, pp. 425–402.Google Scholar
Silvestre, J. (1978), Increasing Returns in General Non-competitive Analysis, Econometrica, vol. 46, pp. 379–402.Google Scholar
Triffin, R. (1940), Monopolistic Competition and General Equilibrium Theory, Harvard, Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Von Hayek, F. (1945), The Use of Knowledge in Society, American Economic Review, vol. 35, pp. 519–389.Google Scholar
Wicksell, K. (1986), Finanz Theoretische, Untersuchungen und das Steuer Wesen Schweden’s, Jena Germany.Google Scholar
Wilson, R. B. (1978), Information, Efficiency and the Core, Econometrica, vol. 46, pp. 807–816.Google Scholar
Wilson, R. B. (1985), Game-Theoretic Analysis of Trading Processes, IMSS TR 474, Cambridge, Massachusetts, Stanford University, présente au 5e Congrès Mondial de la Société d’Econometrie, 20 août, 1985.Google Scholar