Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T15:08:12.926Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Do stock prices and interest rates possess a common trend ?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 August 2016

Amaresh Das
Amaresh Das*
Affiliation:
Public Policy Institute, Georgetown University, Washington D.C.
Get access

Summary

This paper empirically captures the interrelationships between the stock markets and interest rates for a set of Asian markets by means of a new technique called co-dependence. It uses a set of data for three countries in Asia – India, Pakistan and Bangladesh, over a time period spanning from 1985 to 2003.

Résumé

Résumé

Cet article montre empiriquement les interrelations entre les marchés des actions et les taux d'intérêts pour un ensemble de marchés asiatiques, en utilisant une nouvelle technique appelée co-dépendance. Elle utilise les données de trois pays d'Asie – l'Inde, le Pakistan et le Bangladesh – sur une période couvrant les années 1985 à 2003.

Keywords

cointégrationco-mouvementco-dépendancecorrélation en sériesC22E41E52cointegrationco-movementco-dependenceserial correlation common featureC22E41E52
Type
Research Article
Information
Recherches Économiques de Louvain/ Louvain Economic Review , Volume 71 , Issue 4 , 2005 , pp. 383 - 390
Copyright
Copyright © Université catholique de Louvain, Institut de recherches économiques et sociales 2005 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

In revising the paper I have had the benefit of detailed and useful suggestions from an anonymous referee.

References

Blanchard, O.J., (1981), “Output, the stock market and interest rates”, American Economic Review, 71, pp. 132–43.Google Scholar
Campbell, J.Y., Cochrane, J.H. (1999), “By force of habit : a consumption-based explanation of agggregate stock market behavior”, Journal of Political Economy, 107, pp. 205–251.Google Scholar
Engle, R.F. and Issler, J.V. (1995), “Estimating common sectoral cycles”, Journal of Monetary Economics, 23, pp. 83–113.Google Scholar
Engle, R.F. and Kozicki, S. (1993), “Testing for common features”, Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 11, pp. 369–95.Google Scholar
Engle, R.F. and Yoo, B.S. (1987), “Forecasting and testing in cointegrated systems”, Journal of Econometrics, 35, pp. 143–59.Google Scholar
Johansen, S. (1988), “Statistical analysis of cointegration vectors”, Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 12, pp. 231–54.Google Scholar
Hansen, L.P., Heaton, J. Luttmer (1995), “Econometric Evaluation of asset pricing models”, Review of Financial Studies, 8, pp. 237–274.Google Scholar
Hansen, L.P., Jagannathan, R. (1997), Assessing specification errors in stochastic discount factor models, 52, pp. 557–590.Google Scholar
Kasa, K. (1992), “Common stochastic trends in international stock markets”, Journal of Monetary Economics, 20, pp. 196–210.Google Scholar
Nozar, H. and Taylor, P. (1988), “Stock prices, money supply, and interest rates : the question of causality”, Applied Economics, 20, pp. 1603–11.Google Scholar
Rahman, M. and Mustafa, M. (1997), “Dynamic linkages and Granger causality between short-term US corporate bond and stock markets”, Applied Economics Letters, 4, pp. 89–91.Google Scholar
Rutten, Mario (1994), Asian Capitalists in the European Mirror: Comparative Asian Studies, VU Univesity Press, Amsterdam, pp. 26–44.Google Scholar
Sargan, J.D. (1985), “The estimation of economic relationships using instrumental variables”, Econometrica, 53, pp. 393–415.Google Scholar
Philip, A. Shively (2001), “Trend stationarity GNP : Evidence from a new exact pointwise most powerful invariant unit root test”, Journal of Applied Econometrics, 16, pp.537–551.Google Scholar
Vahid, F. and Engle, R.F. (1993), “Common trends and common cycles”, Journal of Applied Econometrics, 8, pp. 341–60.Google Scholar