Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T09:22:16.950Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Language students and their technologies: Charting the evolution 2006–2011

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 April 2013

Caroline H Steel  and
Mike Levy
Caroline H Steel
Affiliation:
School of Languages and Comparative Cultural Studies, The University of Queensland, Brisbane QLD 4072 Australia (email: [email protected])
Mike Levy
Affiliation:
School of Languages and Comparative Cultural Studies, The University of Queensland, Brisbane QLD 4072 Australia (email: [email protected])
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper has two key objectives. Firstly, it seeks to record the technologies in current use by learners of a range of languages at an Australian university in 2011. Data was collected via a large-scale survey of 587 foreign language students across ten languages at The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia. Notably the data differentiates between those technologies that students used inside and outside of formal classrooms as well as recording particular technologies and applications that students perceived as beneficial to their language learning. Secondly, this study aims to compare and contrast its findings with those from two previous studies that collected data on students’ use of technologies five years earlier, in 2006, in the UK and Canada. The intention is to chart major developments and changes that have occurred during the intervening five-year period, between 2006 and 2011. The data reported in two studies, one by Conole (2008) and one by Peters, Weinberg and Sarma (2008) are used as points of reference for the comparison with the present study.

The findings of the current study point to the autonomy and independence of the language learners in this cohort and the re-emergence of CALL tools, both for in-class and out-of-class learning activities. According to this data set, learners appear to have become more autonomous and independent and much more able to shape and resource their personal language learning experience in a blended learning setting. The students also demonstrate a measure of sophistication in their use of online tools, such that they are able to work around known limitations and constraints. In other words, the students have a keen awareness of the affordances of the technologies they are using.

Keywords

CALL toolsonline dictionarieslearner autonomyVLEmobile learning
Type
Research Article
Information
ReCALL , Volume 25 , Issue 3 , September 2013 , pp. 306 - 320
Copyright
Copyright © European Association for Computer Assisted Language Learning 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Authors (2009).Google Scholar
Bax, S. (2003) CALL - Past, present and future. System, 31: 13–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conole, G. (2008) Listening to the Learner Voice: The ever-changing landscape of technology use for language students. ReCALL, 20(2): 124–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conole, G., de Latt, M., Dillon, T., Darby, J. (2006) JISC LXP Student experiences of technologies final report. JISC: Bristol, UK. http://www.jisc.ac.uk/media/documents/programmes/elearningpedagogy/lxpprojectfinalreportdec06.pdfGoogle Scholar
Godwin-Jones, R. (2011) Emerging technologies: Mobile apps for language learning. Language Learning and Technology, 15(2): 2–11.Google Scholar
Guth, S.Helm, F. (2010) Telecollaboration 2.0: Language, literacies and intercultural learning in the 21st century. Bern: Peter Lang.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joseph, R. H.Uther, M. (2009) Mobile devices for language learning: multimedia approaches. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 4(1): 7–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levy, M. (1997) Computer-Assisted Language Learning: Context and conceptualization. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levy, M.Stockwell, G. (2006) CALL Dimensions: Options and issues in Computer Assisted Language Learning. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Peters, M., Weinberg, A.Sarma, N. (2008) To like or not to like! Student perceptions of technological activities for learning French as a second language at five Canadian universities. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 65(5): 869–896.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, S.Vàsquez, C. (2012) Web 2.0 and second language learning: What does the research tell us? CALICO Journal, 29(3): 412–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warschauer, M. (2011) Learning in the Cloud: How (and Why) to transform schools with digital media. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar