Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T22:23:30.307Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Integrating cross-cultural interaction through video-communication and virtual worlds in foreign language teaching programs: is there an added value?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 February 2013

Silvia Canto ,
Kristi Jauregi  and
Huub van den Bergh
Silvia Canto
Affiliation:
Utrecht University, Trans 10, 3512 JK Utrecht, The Netherlands (email: [email protected], email: [email protected], email: [email protected])
Kristi Jauregi
Affiliation:
Utrecht University, Trans 10, 3512 JK Utrecht, The Netherlands (email: [email protected], email: [email protected], email: [email protected])
Huub van den Bergh
Affiliation:
Utrecht University, Trans 10, 3512 JK Utrecht, The Netherlands (email: [email protected], email: [email protected], email: [email protected])
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Organizing and implementing telecollaboration projects in foreign language curricula is not an easy endeavour (Belz & Thorne, 2006; Guth & Helm, 2010), as pedagogical, organizational and technical issues have to be addressed before cross-cultural interaction sessions can be carried out (O'Dowd & Ritter, 2006; O'Dowd, 2011). These issues make many teaching practitioners reluctant to try to integrate telecollaboration in their teaching, as they are more aware of the burden such initiatives might impose than of the benefits they might have for language learners.

Within the European project NIFLAR1 we have tried to study the added value that integrating synchronous collaboration projects through video-web communication or Second Life might have in language learning. The study presented in this paper measures the oral communicative growth of language students, who were allocated at random to one of three research conditions: (1) the VC experimental group carried out interactions with native peers through video-web communication; (2) the SL experimental group carried out the same tasks with native peers in Second Life and (3) the control group performed the tasks face to face with classroom peers and had no opportunity to interact with native experts. Communicative growth was measured by comparing oral pre- and post-tests across conditions. Results show significant differences, the experimental groups outperforming the control group.

Keywords

NIFLARvideo-web communicationvirtual worldsSecond Lifeadded valuecomputer mediated communication.
Type
Research Article
Information
ReCALL , Volume 25 , Issue 1 , January 2013 , pp. 105 - 121
Copyright
Copyright © European Association for Computer Assisted Language Learning 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Belz, J. A. (2003) Linguistic perspectives on the development of intercultural competence in telecollaboration. Language Learning and Technology, 7(2): 68–117.Google Scholar
Belz, J. A.Thorne, S. L. (eds.) (2006) Internet-mediated intercultural foreign language education. Boston: Heinle & Heinle.Google Scholar
Bueno Alastuey, M. C. (2011) Perceived benefits and drawbacks of synchronous voice-based computer mediated communication in the foreign language classroom. CALL Journal, 24(5): 419–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bryant, T. (2006) Using World of Warcraft and Other MMORPGs to Foster a Targeted, Social, and Cooperative Approach Toward Language Learning. Academic Commons. The Library. http://www.academiccommons.org/commons/essay/bryant-MMORPGs-for-SLA.Google Scholar
Ciekanski, M.Chanier, T. (2008) Developing online multimodal verbal communication to enhance the writing process in an audio-graphic conferencing environment. ReCALL, 20(2): 162–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooke-Plagwitz, J. (2008) New Directions in CALL: An Objective Introduction to Second Life. CALICO Journal, 25(3): 547–557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cronbach, L. J. (1957) The two disciplines of scientific psychology. American Psychologist, 12: 671–684.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deutschmann, M.Panichi, L. (2009) Instructional design, teacher practice and learner autonomy. In: Molka-Danielsen, J. and Deutschmann, M. (eds.), Learning and teaching in the virtual world of Second Life. Trondheim: Tapir Academic Press.Google Scholar
Deutschmann, M., Panichi, L.Molka Danielsen, J. (2009) Designing oral participation in Second Life – A comparative study of two language proficiency courses. ReCALL, 21(2): 206–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Develotte, C., Guichon, N.Vincent, C. (2010) The use of the webcam for teaching a foreign language in a desktop videoconferencing environment. ReCALL, 23(3): 293–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dieterle, E.Clarke, J. (2008) Multi-user virtual environments for teaching and learning. In: Pagani, M. (ed.), Encyclopedia of multimedia technology and networking. Hershey, PA: Idea Group, Inc., 1033–1041.Google Scholar
Felix, U.Lawson, M. (1996) Developing German Writing Skills by Way of Timbuktu: A pilot Study Comparing Computer-based and Conventional Teaching. ReCALL, 8(1): 12–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guichon, N. (2010) Preparatory study for the design of a desktop videoconferencing platform for synchronous language teaching. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 23(2): 169–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guth, S.Helm, F. (eds.) (2010) Telecollaboration 2.0. Bern: Peter Lang AG.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guth, S.Maio, M. (2010) Close encounters of a new kind: The use of Skype and Wiki in Telecollaboration. In: Guth, S. and Helm, F. (eds.), Telecollaboration 2.0. Bern: Peter Lang AG, 413–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hampel, R.Hauck, M. (2004) Towards an effective use of audio conferencing in distance language courses. Language Learning and Technology, 8(1): 66–82.Google Scholar
Hampel, R., Felix, U., Hauck, M.Coleman, J. A. (2005) Complexities of learning and teaching languages in a real-time audiographic environment. In: Dvorak and James F. Lee (eds.), German as a Foreign Language Journal. New York: Newbury House, 146–157.Google Scholar
Jauregi, K.Bañados, E. (2008) Virtual interaction through video-web communication: A step towards enriching and internationalizing learning programs. ReCALL, 20(2): 183–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jauregi, K.Bañados, E. (2010) An intercontinental video-web communication project between Chile and The Netherlands. In: Guth, S. and Helm, F. (eds.), Teleollaboration 2.0. Bern: Peter Lang AG, 427–436.Google Scholar
Jauregi, K., Canto, S., Graaff, deR., Koenraad, A.Moonen, M. (2011) Verbal interaction in Second Life: towards a pedagogic framework for task design. Computer Assisted Language Learning Journal, 24(1): 77–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jauregi, K., de Graaff, R., van den Bergh, H.Kriz, M. (2012) Native/non-native speaker interactions through video-web communication; a clue for enhancing motivation? CALL Journal, 25(1): 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelm, O. R. (1992) The use of synchronous computer networks in second language instruction: A preliminary report. Foreign Language Annals, 25: 441–545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kern, R. (1996) Computer-Mediated Communication: Using E-mail Exchanges to Explore Personal Histories in Two Cultures. In: Warschauer, M. (ed.), Telecollaboration in Foreign Language Learning. Hawai'i: Second Language Teaching and Curriculum Centre, 105–119.Google Scholar
Kuriscak, L. M.Luke, C. L. (2009) Language learner attitudes toward virtual worlds: An investigation of Second Life. In: Lord, G. and Lomicka, L. (eds.), The next generation: Online collaboration and social networking in CALL. San Marcos, TX: CALICO, 173–207.Google Scholar
Lamy, M. N. (2004) Oral conversations on line: redefining oral competence in synchronous environments. ReCALL, 16(2): 520–538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liauw, M. (2006) E-learning and the development of intercultural competence. Language Learning & Technology, 10(3): 49–64.Google Scholar
Molka-Danielsen, J.Deutschmann, M. (eds.) (2009) Learning and teaching in the virtual world of Second Life. Trondheim, Norway: Tapir Academic Press.Google Scholar
Müller-Hartmann, A. (2000) The role of tasks in promoting intercultural learning in electronic learning networks. Language Learning and Technology, 4: 129–147.Google Scholar
O'Dowd, R. (2000) Intercultural learning via videoconferencing: a pilot exchange project. ReCALL, 12: 49–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Dowd, R. (2003) Understanding the “other side”: Intercultural learning in a Spanish-English e-mail exchange. Language Learning & Technology, 7(2): 118–144.Google Scholar
O'Dowd, R. (2006) The use of videoconferencing and e-mail as mediators of intercultural student ethnography. In: Belz, J. A and Thorne, S. L. (eds.), Internet-mediated intercultural foreign language education. Boston: Heinle & Heinle, 86–120.Google Scholar
O'Dowd, R. (2007) Evaluating the outcomes of online intercultural exchange. ELT-Journal, 61(2): 144–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Dowd, R. (2011) Online Foreign Language Interaction: Moving from the Periphery to the Core of Foreign Language Education?”. Language Teaching Journal, 44(3): 368–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Dowd, R.Ritter, M. (2006) Understanding and working with ‘failed communication' in telecollaborative exchanges. CALICO Journal, 23(3): 1–20.Google Scholar
Ortega, L. (2009) Interaction and attention to form in L2 text-based computer mediated communication. In: Mackey, A. and Polio, C. (eds.), Multiple perspectives on interaction. New York: Routledge, 226–253.Google Scholar
Pellettieri, J. (2000) Negotiation in cyberspace: The role of chatting in the development of grammatical competence. In: Warschauer, M. and Kern, R. (eds.), Network-based language teaching: concepts and practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 59–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peterson, M. (2010) Learner participation patterns and strategy use in Second Life: an exploratory case study. ReCALL, 22(3): 273–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peterson, M. (2011) Towards a research agenda for the use of 3D virtual worlds in language learning. CALICO, 29(1): 67–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, Peter (2005) Aptitude and second language acquisition. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 25: 45–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sauro, S. (2011) SCMC for SLA: a research synthesis. CALICO, 28(2): 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, B. (2004) Computer-mediated negotiated interaction and lexical acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 26: 365–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sotillo, S. M. (2000) Discourse functions and syntactic complexity in synchronous and asynchronous communication. Language Learning and Technology, 4(1): 82–119.Google Scholar
Steinkuehler, C. (2006) Massively multiplayer online videogaming as participation in a discourse. Mind, Culture & Activity, 13(1): 38–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thorne, S. L. (2006) Pedagogical and praxiological lessons from internet-mediated intercultural foreign language education research. In: Belz, J. A. and Thorne, S. L. (eds.), Internet-mediated intercultural foreign language education. Boston, MA: Heinle & Heinle, 2–30.Google Scholar
Thorne, S. L. (2008) Transcultural communication in open internet environments and massively multiplayer online games. In: Magnan, S. (ed.), MediatingDiscourse Online. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 305–327.Google Scholar
Toyoda, E.Harrison, R. (2002) Categorization of text chat communication between learners and native speakers of Japanese. Language Learning and Technology, 6: 82–99.Google Scholar
Tudini, V. (2007) Negotiation and intercultural learning in Italian native speaker chat rooms. Modern Language Journal, 91(iv): 577–601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, Y. (2004) Supporting synchronous distance language learning with desktop videoconferencing. Language Learning & Technology, 8(3): 90–121.Google Scholar
Wang, Y. (2006) Negotiation of meaning in desktop videoconferencing-supported distance language learning. ReCALL, 18(1): 122–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, Y. (2007) Task design in videoconferencing-supported distance language learning. CALICO Journal, 24(3): 562–590.Google Scholar
Ware, P. D.Kramsch, C. (2005) Toward an intercultural stance: Teaching German and English through telecollaboration. Modern Language Journal, 89: 190–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warschauer, M. (1996) Comparing Face-to-Face and Electronic Communication in the Second Language Classroom. CALICO, 13(2): 7–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warschauer, M.Ware, M. (2008) Learning, change, and power: Competing discourses of technology and literacy. In: Coiro, J., Knobel, M., Lankshear, C. and Leu, D. J. (eds.), Handbook of research on new literacies. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum, 215–240.Google Scholar