Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T15:36:34.171Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A computer-mediated curriculum in the EFL academic writing class

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 December 2008

Adina Levine ,
Orna Ferenz  and
Thea Reves
Adina Levine
Affiliation:
Bar Han University, Ramat Gan, Israel
Orna Ferenz
Affiliation:
Bar Han University, Ramat Gan, Israel
Thea Reves
Affiliation:
Bar Han University, Ramat Gan, Israel
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate the application of a computer mediated curriculum in the instruction of advanced written academic communication skills in a non-immersion situation. While previous studies have focused upon collaborative writing within a computer networked environment (Gregor & Cuskelfy 1994), the use of computer-tutorial programs (Warschauer, Turbee & Roberts 1996), or the additive effects of supplemental computer-based instruction (Chun 1994), the present study dealt with the implementation of a fully computer based EFL writing curriculum through the use of authentic electronic computer programs. The following research questions were posed at the outset of the study:

1. To what extent does the use of authentic tools, tasks and environment encourage communicative competence in the computer networked EFL academic writing classroom?

2. What is the effect of computer mediated instruction on teacher-student interaction, collaborative learning, and students' attitudes and motivation?

3. What are the benefits gained from a computer-assisted portfolio assessment?

The investigation design consisted of an experimental group which studied exclusively in the computerised lab and a control group which was taught in a regular classroom according to conventional teaching methods. Data collecting instruments comprised background and attitude questionnaires, on-site observations, informal interviews, and systematic evaluation and assessment. Findings indicate that authentic tools, tasks and environment are a strong motivating factor. While the compter-nelworked environment enhanced the teacher-student interaction, it diminished peer collaboration. Computer-assisted portfolio assessment appears to be advantageous to both the instructor and students.

Type
Selected Papers
Information
ReCALL , Volume 11 , Issue 1 , May 1999 , pp. 72 - 79
Copyright
Copyright © European Association for Computer Assisted Language Learning 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barson, J., Frommer, J. & Schwartz, M. (1993) “Foreign language learning using email in a task-oriented perspective: interuniversity experiments in communication and collaboration”, Journal of Science Education and Technology 2, 565–584.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burton, P. F. (1994) “Electronic mail as an academic discussion forum”, Journal of Documentation 50, 99–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chun, D. M. (1994) “Using computer networking to facilitate the acquisition of interactive competence”, System 22 (1), 17–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chun, D. M. & Plass, J. L. (1997) “Research on text comprehension in multimedia environments”, Language Learning & Technology 1 (1), 60–81.Google Scholar
Galagher, J. & Kraut, R. E. (1994) “Computer-mediated communication for intellectual teamwork: an experiment in group writing”. Information Systems Research 5, 110–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gregor, S. D. & Cuskelly, E. F. (1994) “Computer-mediated communication in distance education”, Journal of Computer-Assisted Learning 10, 168–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kemp, F. (1993) “The origins of ENFI, network theory, and computer-based collaborative writing instruction at the University of Texas”. In Bertram, B., Peyt, J. & Batson, T. (eds.), Network-based classrooms, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 161–180.Google Scholar
Linard, M. (1994) “From learner's styles to learner's activity: Lessons from various learner-centered research”. In Lewi, R. & Mendelsohn, P. (eds.), Lessons from learning, North-Holland: Elsevier Science B.V.Google Scholar
Warschauer, M. (1996a) “Comparing face-to-face and electronic discussion in the second language classroom”, CALICO Journal 13 (2/3), 7–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warschauer, M. (1996b) “Motivational aspects of using computers for writing and communication”. In Warschauer, M. (ed.), Telecollabora-tion in Foreign Language Learning, Honolulu, HI: University of Hawaii Second Language Teaching and Curriculum Center, 29–46.Google Scholar
Warschauer, M., Turbee, L. & Roberts, B. (1996) “Computer learning networks and student empowerment”, System 24 (1), 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar