Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T06:14:25.914Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Radiocarbon Dating of Pottery from Bronze Age Sites in eastern European steppes (Russia)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 February 2017

P Kuznetsov  and
О Mochalov
P Kuznetsov
Affiliation:
Samara State Social and Pedagogical University, Samara, ul. M. Gorkogo 65/67, 443099, Russia
О Mochalov*
Affiliation:
Samara State Social and Pedagogical University, Samara, ul. M. Gorkogo 65/67, 443099, Russia
*
*Corresponding author. Email: [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In recent decades, the radiocarbon method has frequently been used for dating organic admixtures in pottery. This method is useful for dating the Late Stone Age cultures in eastern Europe due to the poor availability of other organic materials. On the contrary, Bronze Age sites offer a great variety of organic sources, including remains of wooden structures, charcoal, and human and animal bones. This paper analyzes the 14C dates obtained on bones and pottery from six Bronze Age sites in order to determine the feasibility of 14C pottery dating for this particular period. Bronze Age pottery is made of silty clay containing organic matter, which can comprise older material. Therefore, 14С dates obtained on bones, wood, or charcoal are more representative. This paper analyzes the 14C dates obtained on bones and pottery from six Bronze Age sites. Based on this limited study, the authors conclude that dating of pottery from the Bronze Age is controversial and can result in much older dates. We argue this method is acceptable only if no other organic materials are available.

Keywords

Bronze Ageeastern Europechronology
Type
Research Article
Information
Radiocarbon , Volume 59 , Issue 1 , February 2017 , pp. 109 - 116
Copyright
© 2017 by the Arizona Board of Regents on behalf of the University of Arizona 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anthony, DW. 2007. The Horse, the Wheel and Language. How Bronze-Age Riders from the Steppes Shaped the Modern World. Princeton: Princeton University Press. 553 p.Google Scholar
Bronk Ramsey, C, Lee, S. 2013. Recent and planned developments of the program OxCal. Radiocarbon 55(2–3):720–730.Google Scholar
Chernykh, EN, Orlovskaya, LB. 2011. Keramika I radiouglerodnoe datirovanie v ramkakh yamnoy arkheologicheskoy obschnosti: probleminterpretatsii [Pottery and Radiocarbon Dating within the Frames of Yamnaya Archeological Community: the Issues of Interpretation]. In: Chernykh EN, Zavyalov VI, editors. Analytical Research of Natural Science Method Laboratory. Volume 2. Moscow: Taus. p 64–78. In Russian.Google Scholar
Hedges, REM, Tiemei, C, Housley, RA. 1992. Results and methods in the radiocarbon dating of pottery. Radiocarbon 34(3):906–915.Google Scholar
Kuzmin, YV. 2012. Review [Proceedings of the 5th International “14С and Archaeology” Symposium, Zürich, Switzerland, 26–28 March 2008]. Rossiiskaya Arkheologiya 1:123–128. In Russian with English summary.Google Scholar
Kuznetsov, PF. 2013. The dating of the site at Repin Khutor and the chronology of related cultural materials from the East European Steppe Zone of the Early Bronze Age. Rossiiskaya Arkheologiya 1:13–24. In Russian with English summary.Google Scholar
Morgunova, NL. 2014. Priuralskaya Gruppa pamyatnikov v sisteme volzhsko-uralskogo varianta yamnoy kulturno-istoricheskoy oblasti [South Ural Group of the Volga-Ural variant of the Yamnaya cultural and historical community]. Orenburg: Orenburgsky Gosudarstvennyi Pedagogichesky Universitet. 347 р. In Russian.Google Scholar
Morgunova, NL, Khokhlova, OS. 2013. Сhronology and Periodization of the Pit-Grave culture in the region between the Volga and Ural rivers based on radiocarbon dating and paleopedological research. Radiocarbon 55(2–3):1286–1296.Google Scholar
O’Malley, JM, Kuzmin, YV, Burr, GS, Donahue, DJ, Jull, AJT. 1999. Direct radiocarbon accelerator mass spectrometric dating of the Russia Far East and Transbaikal. Memories de la Societe Prehistorique Francaise XXVI:19–24.Google Scholar
Reimer, PJ, Bard, E, Bayliss, A, Beck, JW, Blackwell, PG, Bronk Ramsey, C, Grootes, PM, Guilderson, TP, Haflidason, H, Hajdas, I, Hatté, C, Heaton, TJ, Hoffmann, DL, Hogg, AG, Hughen, KA, Kaiser, KF, Kromer, B, Manning, SW, Niu, M, Reimer, RW, Richards, DA, Scott, EM, Southon, JR, Staff, RA, Turney, CSM, van der Plicht, J. 2013. IntCal13 and Marine13 radiocarbon age calibration curves 0–50,000 years cal BP. Radiocarbon 55(4):1869–1887.Google Scholar
Salugina, NP. 2011. The technology of the Yamnaya (Pit Grave) ceramic production and its relevance to the population history of the Volga-Ural region in the Early Bronze Age. Archaeology, Ethnology & Anthropology of Eurasia 46(2):82–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shcherbakov, N, Shuteleva, I, Golyeva, A, Lunkov, V, Kraeva, L. 2013. The archaeological artifacts complex as reflection of intercultural exchange of the Late Bronze Age tribes of the Southern Urals. Abstracts of 19th Annual Meeting of European Association of Archaeologists. Pilzen. p 319.Google Scholar
Skripkin, VV, Kovalyukh, NN. 1998. Recent developments in the procedures used at the SSCER Laboratory for the routine preparation of lithium carbide. Radiocarbon 40(1):211–214.Google Scholar
Vasilieva, IN. 2011. The Early Neolithic pottery of the Volga-Ural region (based on the materials of the Elshanka culture). Archaeology, Ethnology & Anthropology of Eurasia 46(2):70–81.Google Scholar
Vybornov, A, Zaitseva, G, Kovaliukh, N, Kulkova, M, Possnert, G, Skripkin, V. 2012. Chronological problems with Neolithization of the Northern Caspian Sea Area and the forest-steppe Povolzhye region. Radiocarbon 54(3–4):795–799.Google Scholar
Zaitseva, G, Skripkin, V, Kovaliukh, N, Possnert, G, Dolukhanov, P, Vybornov, A. 2009. Radiocarbon dating of Neolithic pottery. Radiocarbon 51(2):795–801.Google Scholar