Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-03T00:34:04.220Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Location-Dependent Differences in the 14C Content of Wood

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 July 2016

F. G. McCormac
Affiliation:
The Queen's University of Belfast, School of Geosciences, Palaeoecology Centre, Belfast BT7 1NN Northern Ireland
M. G. L. Baillie
Affiliation:
The Queen's University of Belfast, School of Geosciences, Palaeoecology Centre, Belfast BT7 1NN Northern Ireland
J. R. Pilcher
Affiliation:
The Queen's University of Belfast, School of Geosciences, Palaeoecology Centre, Belfast BT7 1NN Northern Ireland
R. M. Kalin
Affiliation:
The Queen's University of Belfast, School of the Built Environment, Belfast BT7 1NN Northern Ireland
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The long 14C chronologies currently used as calibration curves combine results from wood that grew in the western United States, the British Isles and Germany. Although these results show few significant differences in the 14C content of contemporaneous wood when averaged over the length of the chronology (i.e., the means of overlapping sections of chronology are the same), closer examination shows considerable variability. Separating the sections of chronology according to the provenance of the wood used for calibration reveals patterns that suggest small but finite differences in the 14C content of wood from different locations. We conclude that there is some evidence that German and American wood give dates older by between 20 and 40 yr from those of Irish oak for some periods. Additionally we suggest that the shift of the Belfast 1986 calibration data by ca. 18 yr toward older dates may not be valid and that the resultant offset between the Belfast 1986 and Seattle 1993 data shows a small but real difference in the 14C content of contemporaneous American, German and Irish wood. Intralaboratory measurements made in Belfast on contemporaneous German and Irish oak, and bristlecone pine and Irish oak, give offsets of 39 and 41 yr, respectively, with the Irish oak dating younger. Previous studies, in which sample pairs of American and English and French wood were processed in the same laboratory, also showed American wood to be slightly depleted in 14C. None of the findings of this study would significantly alter calibrated 14C dates.

Type
III. Calibration of the 14C Time Scale
Copyright
Copyright © the Department of Geosciences, The University of Arizona 

References

Baillie, M. G. L. 1995 A Slice Through Time: Dendrochronology and Precision Dating. London, Batsford: 176 p.Google Scholar
Becker, B. and Delorme, A. 1978 Oak chronologies for Central Europe: Their extension from medieval to prehistoric times. BAR International Series 51: 5964.Google Scholar
Bruns, M., Levin, I, Munnich, K. O., Hubberten, H. W. and Fillipakis, S. 1980 Regional sources of volcanic carbon dioxide and their influence on 14C content of present-day plant material. In Stuiver, M. and Kra, R. S., eds., Proceedings of the 10th International 14C Conference. Radiocarbon 22(2): 532536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cain, W. F. and Suess, H. E. 1976 Carbon 14 in tree rings. Journal of Geophysical Research 81(21): 36883694.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Damon, P. E., Burr, G., Cain, W. J. and Donahue, D. J. 1992 Anomalous 11-year Δ14C cycle at high latitudes. Radiocarbon 34(2): 235238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Vries, H. 1958 Variations in concentration of radiocarbon with time and location on earth. Proceedings of the Koninklijke Nederlandse Akademie van Wetenschappen Series B 5: 94102.Google Scholar
Gulliksen, S. and Scott, M. 1995 Report of the TIRI Workshop, Saturday 13 August 1994. Radiocarbon , this issue.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hollstein, E. 1980 Mitteleuropaische Eichenchronologie. Mainz am Rhein, Phillip Von Zabern: 273 p.Google Scholar
Lerman, J. C., Mook, W. G. and Vogel, J. C. 1970 14C in tree-rings from different localities. In Olsson, I. U., ed., Radiocarbon Variations and Absolute Chronology. Proceedings of the 12th Nobel Symposium. Stockholm, Almqvist & Wiksell: 275299.Google Scholar
Levin, I., Kromer, B., Schoch-Fischer, H., Bruns, M., Munnich, M., Berdau, D., Vogel, J. C. and Munnich, K. O. 1985 25 years of tropospheric 14C observations in Central Europe. Radiocarbon 27(1): 119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Linick, T. W., Suess, H. E. and Becker, B. 1985 La Jolla measurements of radiocarbon in South German oak tree-ring chronologies. Radiocarbon 27(1): 2032.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCormac, F. G. and Baillie, M. G. L. 1993 Radiocarbon to calendar date conversion: Calendrical band widths as a function of radiocarbon precision. Radiocarbon 35(2): 311316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCormac, F. G., Baillie, M. G. L., Pilcher, J. R., Brown, D. M. and Hoper, S. T. 1994 δ13C measurements from the Irish oak chronology. Radiocarbon 36(1): 2735.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCormac, F. G., Kalin, R. M. and Long, A. 1992 Radiocarbon dating beyond 50,000 years by liquid scintillation counting. In Noakes, J. C., Schönhofer, F. and Polach, H. A., eds., Liquid Scintillation Spectrometry 1992. Tucson, Arizona, Radiocarbon: 125133.Google Scholar
Pearson, G.W. (ms.) 1984 The development of high-precision 14C measurement and its application to archaeological time-scale problems. Ph.D. dissertation, The Queen's University, Belfast: 164 p.Google Scholar
Pearson, G. W. and Baillie, M. G. L. 1983 High-precision 14C measurements of Irish oaks to show the natural atmospheric 14C variations of the ad time period. In Stuiver, M. and Kra, R. S., eds., Proceedings of the 11th International 14C Conference. Radiocarbon 25 (2):187196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pearson, G. W., Becker, B. and Qua, F. 1993 High-precision 14C measurement of German and Irish oaks to show the natural 14C variations from 7890 to 5000 bc. In Stuiver, M., Long, A. and Kra, R. S., eds., Calibration 1993. Radiocarbon 35 (1): 93104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pearson, G. W., Pilcher, J. R., Baillie, M. G. L., Corbett, D. M. and Qua, F. 1986 High-precision 14C measurement of Irish oaks to show the natural 14C variations from ad 1840 to 5210 bc. In Stuiver, M. and Kra, R. S., eds., Proceedings of the 12th International 14C conference. Radiocarbon 28(2B): 911934.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pearson, G.W., Pilcher, J. R., Baillie, M. G. L. and Hillam, J. 1977 Absolute radiocarbon dating using a low altitude European tree-ring calibration. Nature 270(5632): 2528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pearson, G. W. and Qua, F. 1993 High-precision 14C measurements of Irish oaks to show the natural 14C variations from ad 1840–5000 bc: A correction. In Stuiver, M., Long, A. and Kra, R. S., eds., Calibration 1993. Radiocarbon 35(1): 105123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pearson, G. W. and Stuiver, M. 1986 High-precision calibration of the radiocarbon time scale, 500–2500 bc. In Stuiver, M. and Kra, R. S., eds., Proceedings of the 12th International 14C Conference. Radiocarbon 28 (2B): 839862.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pearson, G. W. and Stuiver, M. 1993 High-precision calibration of the radiocarbon time scale, 500–2500 bc. In Stuiver, M., Long, A. and Kra, R. S., eds., Calibration 1993. Radiocarbon 35 (1): 2533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stuiver, M. 1982 A high-precision calibration of the ad radiocarbon time-scale. Radiocarbon 24(1): 126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stuiver, M. and Becker, B. 1986 High-precision decadal calibration of the radiocarbon time scale, ad 1950–2500 bc. In Stuiver, M. and Kra, R. S., eds., Proceedings of the 12th International 14C Conference. Radiocarbon 28(2B): 863910.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stuiver, M. and Becker, B. 1993 High-precision decadal calibration of the radiocarbon time scale, ad 1950–6000 bc. In Stuiver, M., Long, A. and Kra, R. S., eds., Calibration 1993. Radiocarbon 35(1): 3565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stuiver, M. and Pearson, G. W. 1986 High-precision calibration of the radiocarbon time scale, ad 1950–500 bc. In Stuiver, M. and Kra, R. S., eds., Proceedings of the 12th International 14C Conference. Radiocarbon 28(2B): 805838.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stuiver, M. and Pearson, G. W. 1993 High-precision bidecadal calibration of the radiocarbon time scale, ad 1950–500 bc and 2500–6000 bc. In Stuiver, M., Long, A. and Kra, R. S., eds., Calibration 1993. Radiocarbon 35(1): 123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stuiver, M., Pearson, G. W. and Braziunas, T. 1986 Radiocarbon age calibration of marine samples back to 9000 cal yr bp. In Stuiver, M. and Kra, R. S., eds., Proceedings of the 12th International 14C Conference. Radiocarbon 28(2B): 9801021.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stuiver, M. and Quay, P. D. 1981 Atmospheric 14C changes resulting from fossil fuel CO2 release and cosmic ray flux variability. Earth and Planetary Science Letters 53: 349362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suess, H. E. 1970 The three causes of the secular carbon-14 fluctuations, their amplitudes and time constants. In Olsson, I. U., ed., Radiocarbon Variations and Absolute Chronology. Proceedings of the 12th Nobel Symposium. Stockholm, Almqvist & Wiksell: 305312.Google Scholar
Suess, H. E. 1978 La Jolla measurements of radiocarbon in treering dated wood. Radiocarbon 20(1): 118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vogel, J. C., Fuls, A., Visser, E. and Becker, B. 1993 Pretoria calibration curve for short-lived samples, 1930–3350 bc. In Stuiver, M., Long, A. and Kra, R. S., Calibration 1993. Radiocarbon 35(1): 7385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar