Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T02:29:33.442Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Marine Reservoir Correction for American Samoa Using U-series and AMS Dated Corals

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 August 2016

Jeffrey T Clark*
Affiliation:
Department of Sociology and Anthropology, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND 58018, USA
Seth Quintus
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, University of Hawai’i at Mānoa, Honolulu, HI 96822, USA
Marshall I Weisler
Affiliation:
School of Social Science, University of Queensland, St Lucia, Qld 4072, Australia
Emma St Pierre
Affiliation:
School of Social Science, University of Queensland, St Lucia, Qld 4072, Australia
Luke Nothdurft
Affiliation:
School of Earth, Environmental and Biological Sciences, Queensland University of Technology, GPO Box 2434, Brisbane, Qld 4001, Australia
Yuexing Feng
Affiliation:
Radiogenic Isotope Laboratory, School of Earth Sciences, University of Queensland, St Lucia, Qld 4072, Australia
Quan Hua
Affiliation:
Australia Nuclear Science and Technology Organisation (ANSTO), Locked Bag 2001, Kirrawee DC, New South Wales 2232, Australia
*
*Corresponding author. Email: [email protected].

Abstract

Radiocarbon dating of marine samples requires a local marine reservoir correction, or ΔR value, for accurate age calibrations. For the Samoan Archipelago in the central Pacific, ΔR values have been proposed previously, but, unlike some Polynesian archipelagoes, ΔR values seem not to vary spatially and temporally. Here, we demonstrate such variability by reporting a ΔR of –101±72 ΔR for the Manu‘a Group—the eastern-most islands in the archipelago—for the colonization period. This value is based on accelerator mass spectrometry (AMS) 14C and uranium-thorium (U-Th) series dating of individual coral branches from pre-2300 cal BP archaeological contexts. This figure differs from the previously proposed modern ΔR of 28±26 yr derived from dated historic, pre-1950, shell samples from the western islands of Samoa. Consequently, we recommend using the ΔR of –101±72 yr for the 1st millennium BC in Manu‘a, and 28±26 yr for calibrating dates within the 2nd millennium AD in the western islands (Savai‘i to Tutuila). Until more data from across the archipelago and from throughout the entire culture-historical sequence document ΔR variability, we recommend that researchers use both of these ΔR values to evaluate how the dates of marine-derived samples compare with AMS dates on identified, short-lived wood charcoal.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 2016 by the Arizona Board of Regents on behalf of the University of Arizona 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Addison, DA. 2008. Report on archaeological test excavations at the new Ta’u Dispensary Site. Report on file at the American Samoa Historic Preservation Office, Pago Pago, American Samoa.Google Scholar
Allen, MS, Huebert, JM. 2014. Short-lived plant materials, long-lived trees, and Polynesian 14C dating: considerations for 14C sample selection and documentation. Radiocarbon 56(1):120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allen, MS, Wallace, R. 2007. New evidence from the East Polynesian gateway: substantive and methodological results from Aitutaki, Southern Cook Islands. Radiocarbon 49(3):11631179.Google Scholar
Anderson, A. 1991. The chronology of colonization in New Zealand. Antiquity 65(249):767795.Google Scholar
Anderson, MB, Stirling, CH, Zimmermann, B, Halliday, AN. 2010. Precise determination of the open ocean 234U/238U composition. Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems 11(12):Q12003.Google Scholar
Bronk Ramsey, C. 2009. Bayesian analysis of radiocarbon dates. Radiocarbon 51(1):337360.Google Scholar
Burley, D, Weisler, MI, Zhao, JX. 2012. High precision U/Th dating of first Polynesian settlement. PLoS ONE 7(11):e48769.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chen, JH, Edwards, RL, Wasserburg, GJ. 1986. 238U, 234U and 232Th in seawater. Earth Planetary Science Letters 80(3–4):241251.Google Scholar
Clark, TR, Roff, G, Zhao, JX, Feng, YX, Done, TJ, Pandolfi, JM. 2014a. Testing the precision and accuracy of the U-Th chronometer for dating coral mortality events in the last 100 years. Quaternary Geochronology 23:3545.Google Scholar
Clark, TR, Zhao, JX, Roff, G, Feng, YX, Done, TJ, Nothdurft, LD, Pandolfi, JM. 2014b. Discerning the timing and cause of historical mortality events in modern Porites from the Great Barrier Reef. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 138:5780.Google Scholar
Clark, JT, Quintus, S, Weisler, MI St, Pierre, E, Nothdurft, L, Feng, Y. 2016. Refining the chronology for West Polynesian colonization: new data from the Samoan Archipelago. Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports 6:266274.Google Scholar
Cleghorn, PL, Shapiro, W. 2000. Archaeological data recovery report for the proposed Ta’u road reconstruction, at Fagā and Fitiuta, Ta’u Island, Manu’a, American Samoa. Report on file at the American Samoa Historic Preservation Office, Pago Pago, American Samoa.Google Scholar
Cobb, KM, Charles, CD, Cheng, H, Kastner, M, Edwards, RL. 2003. U/Th-dating living and young fossil corals from the central Pacific. Earth and Planetary Science Letters 210(1–2):91103.Google Scholar
Dean, JS. 1978. Independent dating in archaeological analysis. In Schiffer MD, editor. Advances in Archaeological Method and Theory. New York: Academic Press. p 223255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Druffel, ERM, Griffin, S, Guilderson, TP, Kasahgarian, M, Southon, J, Schrag, DP. 2001. Changes of subtropical North Pacific radiocarbon and correlation with climate variability. Radiocarbon 43(1):1525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dye, T. 1994. Apparent ages of marine shells: implications for archaeological dating in Hawai’i. Radiocarbon 36(1):5157.Google Scholar
Fink, D, Hotchkis, MAC, Hua, Q, Jacobsen, GE, Smith, AM, Zoppi, U, Child, D, Mifsud, C, van der Gaast, HA, Williams, AA, Williams, M. 2004. The ANTARES AMS Facility at ANSTO. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B 223–224:109115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, RC, Davidson, JM. 1974. Radiocarbon and stratigraphic sequence for Samoa. In: Green RC, Davidson JM, editors. Archaeology in Western Samoa Volume II. Auckland: Auckland Institute and Museum. Bulletin 7. p 212224.Google Scholar
Guilderson, TP, Schrag, DP, Cane, MA. 2004. Surface water mixing in the Solomon Sea as documented by a high-resolution coral 14C record. Journal of Climate 17(5):11471156.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hua, Q. 2013. Radiocarbon dating of marine carbonates. In: Encyclopedia of Scientific Dating Methods. Dordrecht: Springer Science+Business Media. doi:10.1007/978-94-007-6326-5_151-1.Google Scholar
Hua, Q, Jacobsen, GE, Zoppi, U, Lawson, EM, Williams, AA, Smith, AM, McGann, MJ. 2001. Progress in radiocarbon target preparation at the ANTARES AMS Centre. Radiocarbon 43(2A):275282.Google Scholar
Hua, Q, Woodroffe, CD, Smithers, SG, Barbetti, M, Fink, D. 2005. Radiocarbon in corals from the Cocos (Keeling) Islands and implications for Indian Ocean circulation. Geophysical Research Letters 32:L21602.Google Scholar
Hua, Q, Webb, G, Zhao, J-X, Nothdurft, L, Lybolt, M, Price, G, Opdyke, B. 2015. Large variations in the Holocene marine radiocarbon reservoir effect reflect ocean circulation and climatic changes. Earth and Planetary Science Letters 422:3344.Google Scholar
Hughen, KA, Baillie, MGL, Bard, E, Beck, JW, Bertrand, CJH, Blackwell, PG, Buck, CE, Burr, GS, Cutler, KB, Damon, PE, Edwards, RL, Fairbanks, RG, Friedrich, M, Guilderson, TP, Kromer, B, McCormac, G, Manning, S, Bronk Ramsey, C, Reimer, PJ, Reimer, RW, Remmele, S, Southon, JR, Stuiver, M, Talamo, S, Taylor, FW, van der Plicht, J, Weyhenmeyer, CE. 2004. Marine04 marine radiocarbon age calibration, 0–26 cal kyr BP. Radiocarbon 46(3):10591086.Google Scholar
Jennings, JD, Holmer, RN. 1980. Chronology. In: Jennings JD, Holmer RN, editors. Archaeological Excavation in Western Samoa. Honolulu: Pacific Anthropological Records No. 32. p 5–10.Google Scholar
Khaweerat, S, Weisler, MI, Zhao, J-X, Feng, Y, Yu, K. 2011. Human-caused stratigraphic mixing of a coastal Hawaiian midden during prehistory: implications for interpreting cultural deposits. Geoarchaeology 25(5):527540.Google Scholar
Kirch, PV. 1993a. Radiocarbon chronology of the To’aga Site. In: Kirch PV, Hunt TL, editors. The To’aga Site: Three Millennia of Polynesian Occupation in the Manu’a Islands, American Samoa. Berkeley: Contributions of the University of California Archaeological Research Facility No. 51. p 8592.Google Scholar
Kirch, PV. 1993b. The To’aga site: modeling morphodynamics of the land-sea interface. In: Kirch PV, Hunt TL, editors. The To’aga Site: Three Millennia of Polynesian Occupation in the Manu’a Islands, American Samoa. Berkeley: Contributions of the University of California Archaeological Research Facility No. 51. p 3142.Google Scholar
Kirch, PV, Hunt, TL. 1993a. The To’aga Site: Three Millennia of Polynesian Occupation in the Manu’a Islands, American Samoa. Berkeley: Contributions of the University of California Archaeological Research Facility No. 51.Google Scholar
Kirch, PV, Hunt, TL. 1993b. Excavations at the To’aga site (AS-13-1). In: Kirch PV, Hunt TL, editors. The To’aga Site: Three Millennia of Polynesian Occupation in the Manu’a Islands, American Samoa. Berkeley: Contributions of the University of California Archaeological Research Facility No. 51. p 4383.Google Scholar
Ludwig, KR. 2003. User’s Manual for Isoplot/Ex Version 3.0: a Geochronological Toolkit for Microsoft Excel. Berkeley: Berkeley Geochronology Centre. Special Publication No. 3.Google Scholar
McDougall, I. 2010. Age of volcanism and its migration in the Samoa Islands. Geological Magazine 147:705717.Google Scholar
McFadgen, BG, Knox, FB, Cole, TRL. 1994. Radiocarbon calibration curve variations and their implications for the interpretation of New Zealand prehistory. Radiocarbon 36(2):221236.Google Scholar
Mulrooney, MA, Bickler, SH, Allen, MS, Ladefoged, TN. 2011. High-precision dating of colonization and settlement in East Polynesia, Published Letter. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science 108:E192E194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nakamura, S. 1984. Soil Survey of American Samoa. Washington, DC: US Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service.Google Scholar
Nothdurft, LD, Webb, GE. 2009. Earliest diagenesis in scleractinian coral skeletons: implications for palaeoclimate-sensitive geochemical archives. Facies 55:161201.Google Scholar
Petchey, FJ. 2009. Dating marine shell in Oceania: issues and prospects. In: Fairbairn A, O’Connor S, Marwick B, editors. New Directions in Archaeological Science . Terra Australis 28. Canberra: ANU E Press. p 157172.Google Scholar
Petchey, FJ, Addison, DJ. 2008. Radiocarbon dating marine shell in Samoa-a review. In: Addison DJ, Sand C, editors. Recent Advances in the Archaeology of the Fiji/West Polynesia Region. Dunedin: University of Otago Studies in Prehistoric Anthropology, No. 21. p 7986.Google Scholar
Petchey, F, Phelan, M, White, JP. 2004. New ΔR values for the southwest Pacific Ocean. Radiocarbon 46(2):10051014.Google Scholar
Petchey, F, Anderson, A, Hogg, A, Zondervan, A. 2008. The marine reservoir effect in the Southern Ocean: an evaluation of extant and new ΔR values and their application to archaeological chronologies. Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand 38(4):243262.Google Scholar
Petchey, F, Allen, MS, Addison, DJ, Anderson, A. 2009. Stability in the South Pacific marine 14C reservoir over the last 750 years. Evidence from American Samoa, the southern Cook Islands and the Marquesas. Journal of Archaeological Science 36(10):22342243.Google Scholar
Phelan, MB. 1999. A ΔR correction value for Samoa from known-age marine shells. Radiocarbon 41(1):99101.Google Scholar
Quintus, S. 2015. Dynamics of agricultural development in prehistoric Samoa: the case of Ofu Island [PhD dissertation]. Auckland: University of Auckland.Google Scholar
Quintus, S, Clark, JT, Day, SS, Schwert, DP. 2015. Landscape evolution and human settlement patterns on Ofu Island, Manu’a Group, American Samoa. Asian Perspectives 54(2):208237.Google Scholar
Reimer, PJ, Reimer, R. 2003. Marine reservoir correction database [online]. http://calib.org/marine/. Accessed 15 January 2016.Google Scholar
Reimer, PJ, Bard, E, Bayliss, A, Beck, JW, Blackwell, PG, Bronk Ramsey, C, Buck, CE, Cheng, H, Edwards, RL, Friedrich, M, Grootes, PM, Guilderson, TP, Haflidason, H, Hajdas, I, Hatté, C, Heaton, TJ, Hoffmann, DL, Hogg, AG, Hughen, KA, Kaiser, KF, Kromer, B, Manning, SW, Niu, M, Reimer, RW, Richards, RA, Scott, EM, Southon, JR, Staff, RA, Turney, CSM, van der Plicht, J. 2013. IntCal13 and Marine13 radiocarbon age calibration curves 0–50,000 years cal BP. Radiocarbon 55(4):18691887.Google Scholar
Richards, DA, Dorale, JA. 2003. Uranium-series chronology and environmental applications of speleothems. In: Bourdon B, Henderson GM, Lundstrom CC, Turner SP, editors. Uranium-series Geochemistry. Washington, DC: Mineralogical Society of America. p 407460.Google Scholar
Rieth, TM, Hunt, TL. 2008. A radiocarbon chronology for Samoan prehistory. Journal of Archaeological Science 35(7):19011927.Google Scholar
Rieth, TM, Morrison, AE, Addison, DJ. 2008. The temporal and spatial patterning of the initial settlement of Sāmoa. Journal of Island and Coastal Archaeology 3:214239.Google Scholar
Robinson, LF, Belshaw, N, Henderson, GM. 2004. U and Th concentrations and isotope ratios in modern carbonates and waters from the Bahamas. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 68(8):17771789.Google Scholar
Sadler, J, Webb, GE, Nothdurft, LD, Dechnik, B. 2014. Geochemistry-based coral palaeoclimate studies and the potential of ‘non-traditional’ (non-massive Porites) corals: recent developments and future progression. Earth-Science Reviews 139:291316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scholz, D, Mangini, A. 2007. How precise are U-series coral ages? Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 71(8):19351948.Google Scholar
Shen, C, Li, K, Sieh, K, Natawidjaja, DH, Cheng, H, Wang, X, Edwards, RL, Lam, DD, Hsieh, Y, Fan, T, Meltzner, AJ, Taylor, FW, Quinn, TM, Chiang, H, Kilbourne, KH. 2008. Variation of initial 230Th/232Th and limits of high precision U-Th dating of shallow water corals. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 72(17):42014223.Google Scholar
Spriggs, M, Anderson, A. 1993. Late colonization of East Polynesia. Antiquity 67(255):200217.Google Scholar
Stirling, CH, Esat, TM, McCulloch, MT, Lambeck, K. 1995. High-precision U-series dating of corals from Western Australia and implications for the timing and duration of the Last Interglacial. Earth and Planetary Science Letters 135(1–4):115130.Google Scholar
Stuiver, M, Pearson, GW, Braziunas, T. 1986. Radiocarbon age calibration of marine samples back to 9000 cal yr BP. Radiocarbon 28(2B):9801021.Google Scholar
Taylor, RE, Bar-Yosef, O. 2014. Radiocarbon Dating. 2nd edition. Walnut Creek: Left Coast Press.Google Scholar
Veron, J. 2000. Corals of the World. Volume 1. Townsville: Australian Institute of Marine Science.Google Scholar
Weisler, MI. 1989. Chronometric dating and late Holocene prehistory in the Hawaiian Islands: a critical review of radiocarbon dates from Moloka’i Island. Radiocarbon 31(2):121145.Google Scholar
Weisler, MI, Green, RC. 2011. Rethinking the chronology of colonization of Southeast Polynesia. In: Jones TL, Storey AA, Matisoo-Smith EA, Miguel-Ramíres-Aliaga J, editors. Polynesians in America: Pre-Columbian Contacts with the New World. Lanham: Altamira Press. p 215237.Google Scholar
Weisler, MI, Collerson, K, Feng, Y-X, Zhao, J-X, Yu, K-F. 2006. Thorium-230 coral chronology of a late prehistoric Hawaiian chiefdom. Journal of Archaeological Science 33(2):273282.Google Scholar
Weisler, MI, Hua, Q, Zhao, J-X. 2009. Late Holocene 14C marine reservoir corrections for Hawai’i derived from U-series dated archaeological coral. Radiocarbon 51(3):955968.Google Scholar
Wilmshurst, JM, Hunt, TL, Lipo, CP, Anderson, AJ. 2011. High-precision radiocarbon dating show recent and rapid initial human colonization of East Polynesia. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 108(5):18151820.Google Scholar
Wood, WR, Johnson, DL. 1978. A survey of disturbance processes in archaeological site formation. Advances in Archaeological Method and Theory 1:315381.Google Scholar
Wright, E. 1986. Petrology and geochemistry of shield-building and post-erosional lava series of Samoa: implication for mantle heterogeneity and magma genesis [dissertation]. San Diego: University of California at San Diego.Google Scholar
Yokoyama, Y, Esat, TM. 2004. Long term variations of uranium isotopes and radiocarbon in the surface seawater recorded in corals. In: Shiyomi M, Kawahata H, Koizumi H, Tsuda A, Awaya Y, editors. Global Environmental Change in the Ocean and on Land. Tokyo: Terrapub. p 279309.Google Scholar
Yu, K, Hua, Q, Zhao, J-X, Hodge, E, Fink, D, Barbetti, M. 2010. Holocene marine 14C reservoir age variability: evidence from 230Th-dated corals from South China Sea. Paleoceanography 25(3):PA3205.Google Scholar