Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T05:31:34.512Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Protonation constants of endo- and exogenous L-amino acids and their derivatives in aqueous and mixed solution: Unraveling molecular secrets

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 October 2024

Marek Pająk*
Affiliation:
Department of Physical and Biocoordination Chemistry, Medical University of Lodz, Lodz, Poland
Jakub Fichna
Affiliation:
Department of Biochemistry, Medical University of Lodz, Lodz, Poland
Magdalena Woźniczka
Affiliation:
Department of Physical and Biocoordination Chemistry, Medical University of Lodz, Lodz, Poland
*
Corresponding author: Marek Pająk; Email: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The aim of this review is to summarize the progress made in the determination of the protonation constants of biologically active ligands: endo- and exogenous L-amino acids and their derivatives in aqueous and mixed solutions using different experimental techniques. The knowledge of the protonation constants of the aforementioned ligands is crucial for the determination of the equilibrium constants of complex formation and thus for the understanding of complex biological reactions such as transamination, racemization, and decarboxylation. Thus, the protonation constants of ligands are a measure of their ability to form complexes with metal ions. This knowledge not only helps to understand fundamental biochemical processes, but also has practical applications in areas such as drug design, where ligands are often targeted for therapeutic purposes. The activity of the ligands tends to increase after complexation and their order is consistent with the values of the stepwise dissociation constants of the complexes formed. Understanding the properties of ligands by determining their protonation constants in different environments and their interactions with surrounding molecules is crucial to unraveling the complexity of biological systems.

Type
Review
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press

Introduction

The molecular behavior of ligands in solution is a fascinating and complex field with significant implications in chemistry, biochemistry, and pharmacology. Understanding the interplay between ligand and solution is crucial as solvent molecules can influence the electronic structure, reactivity, and thermodynamics of ligand species. Firstly, the solvation or hydration of ligands in solution is of paramount importance in understanding how ligands interact with solvents at the molecular level. Secondly, as entities that bind to metal ions or other molecules, ligands exhibit protolitic properties (the ability to accept or donate protons) (El-Sherif, Reference El-Sherif2011). Data on the protonation constants of biologically active ligands in different media (aqueous and mixed solutions) are invaluable for understanding their chemistry in biological systems (AlJahdali et al., Reference AlJahdali, AbedelKarim, El-Sherif and Ahmed2014).

In vivo reactions primarily occur in aqueous environments, leading to a predominant interest in the properties of bioligands in such solutions. However, there is evidence in the literature that water is not a perfect mimic of the in vivo reaction environment. In enzymes, membranes, and other biologically relevant sites, the values of the protonation constants differ significantly from those in water, as these environments tend to be more lipophilic than hydrophilic (Fiol et al., Reference Fiol, Brandariz and Vicente1995; Partanen, Reference Partanen1998). Concurrently, the ionization state of a ligand can affect its solubility, membrane permeability, and interaction with biological targets (El-Sherif, Reference El-Sherif2012). As a result, studies in environments other than water can provide some insight into the chemistry of bioligands in living systems.

Amino acids are particularly important among other chemical groups because they are the basic building blocks of living organisms. Not only do they form tissues, but they also function as reactive organic compounds that regulate vital biological processes. Understanding the physical and protolytic properties of amino acids is essential to understanding the behavior and synthesis of proteins and enzymes in living organisms. These compounds are often regarded as excellent model systems to gain insight into the properties of naturally occurring metalloproteins (Kozłowski et al., Reference Kozłowski, Bal, Dyba and Kowalik-Jankowska1999; El-Sherif et al., Reference El-Sherif, Shehata, Shoukry and Barakat2012a, Reference El-Sherif, Shoukry, Hosny and Abd-Elmoghny2012b).

Understanding the molecular secrets of bioligands in aqueous and mixed environments is essential for unraveling the intricacies of biochemical pathways, drug–receptor interactions, and the design of bioactive compounds (Al-Awadi et al., Reference Al-Awadi, Shuaib, Abbas, El-Sherif, El-Dissouky and Al-Saleh2008; Aljahdali and El-Sherif, Reference Aljahdali and El-Sherif2012). With this in mind, this review discusses the valuable information available in the literature on bioactive ligands: endogenous L-amino acids (alanine, asparagine, cysteine, glycine, glutamine, aspartic acid, glutamic acid, proline, serine, tyrosine) and exogenous L-amino acids (arginine, phenylalanine, histidine, leucine, isoleucine, lysine, methionine, threonine, tryptophan, valine) and their derivatives in both environments.

Definition and importance of ligand protonation constants

The protonation constant, also known as the acid constant, is the equilibrium constant for the reaction of a ligand L (or any chemical species) with a proton (H+) to form the corresponding protonated species. The equilibrium reaction is written as:

$$ \mathrm{L}+{\mathrm{H}}^{+}\hskip0.6em \rightleftarrows \hskip0.6em \mathrm{L}{\mathrm{H}}^{+}, $$

where L is the unprotonated form of the ligand, H+ is the proton and LH+ is the protonated form of the ligand. The protonation constant (K) is defined as the ratio of the concentrations of the protonated and unprotonated forms at equilibrium:

$$ K=\frac{\left[\mathrm{L}{\mathrm{H}}^{+}\right]}{\left[\mathrm{L}\right]\left[{\mathrm{H}}^{+}\right]}. $$

Take the negative logarithm of K to obtain the pK value:

$$ \mathrm{p}K=-\log K. $$

The pK is a measure of the acidity of the ligand: lower pK values indicate greater acidity, meaning the ligand is more likely to donate the proton (Zhou et al., Reference Zhou, Jhamb, Liang, Sundmacher and Gani2018).

Reasons for the determination of ligand protonation constants

Protonation constants are the equilibrium constants for the interaction of the proton with charged or uncharged ligands depending on the availability of hydrogen ions in aqueous and mixed solutions. These parameters are used to predict the ionization state of the molecule as a function of pH. The main purposes of determining the protonation constants of ligands in solution are to:

  1. a) determine the pH values for the different forms of the compound under investigation,

  2. b) perform a quantitative spectrophotometric analysis by selecting a suitable pH on the basis of the different UV spectra,

  3. c) isolate the compound with maximum yield by identifying the pH range at which the minimum ionization of the compound occurs,

  4. d) provide additional information on the structure of the newly synthesized ligand (agreement between theoretically calculated and experimental protonation constants indicates the potential correctness of the proposed structure),

  5. e) prepare buffer solutions at different pH values (Martell and Calvin, Reference Martell and Calvin1952; Liptay et al., Reference Liptay, Rossotti and Rossotti1962; Rossotti, Reference Rossotti1978),

  6. f) calculate the stability constants of complex formation between biologically active ligands and metal ions in coordination chemistry,

  7. g) elucidate the intricate mechanisms of metalloenzymes and their catalytic activities (Sigel and Martin, Reference Sigel and Martin1982),

  8. h) study the mobility and bioavailability of metal ions in natural waters (metal speciation and contaminant fate in environmental chemistry) (Flaschka, Reference Flaschka1974).

The side chain groups of amino acids are involved in a variety of functions, including metal binding, weak interactions, and cofactor activities. In chemical systems, these groups are useful in the construction of artificial functionalized complexes, such as the model active site complexes of metalloenzymes and in the imidazolate – bridged multinuclear complexes that form molecular assemblies (Shimazaki et al., Reference Shimazaki, Takani and Yamauchi2009).

Thanks to the protonation constants of amino acids and their derivatives, we are still discovering new metal ion binding sites in proteins. The amino acids form stable five-membered chelates with various metal ions via the amine and carboxylate moieties (N, O – chelation). Several amino acids possess an additional metal binding site in the side chain and thus form metal complexes with a variety of structures. Groups such as the imidazole ring of histidine, the phenol ring of tyrosine, and the thiol group of cysteine are important metal binding sites in proteins. Similarly, the carboxylate groups of aspartate and glutamate and the thioether moiety of methionine are often involved in metal binding. These and other amino acid side chain groups form a microenvironment around the metal center which is necessary for substrate recognition and fixation and for the catalytic exercise of enzyme functions through non-covalent or weak interactions (hydrogen bonding, π-π stacking interactions, and hydrophobic interactions) (Berthon, Reference Berthon1995).

Methods for the determination of ligand protonation constants

There are several techniques such as potentiometry, conductometry, and spectrophotometry that can be used to determine protonation constants. This paper presents data and results from the use of the potentiometric method as it has the widest range of applicability and reliability (Woermann, Reference Woermann1973).

Potentiometric titrations are widely used for their precision in determining the acid–base equilibria of ligands. In this method, a ligand solution is titrated with a strong base while monitoring changes in pH. The most commonly used programs for solution equilibrium constants are PKPOT (Barbosa et al., Reference Barbosa, Barron, Beltrán and Sanz-Nebot1995), PKAS (Martell and Motekaitis, Reference Martell and Motekaitis1992), BEST (Motekaitis and Martell, Reference Motekaitis and Martell1982), MINIQUAD (Sabatini et al., Reference Sabatini, Vacca and Gans1974), MINIQUAD75 (Gans et al., Reference Gans, Sabatini and Vacca1976), SUPERQUAD (Gans et al., Reference Gans, Sabatini and Vacca1985), PSEQUAD (Vacca and Sabatini, Reference Vacca and Sabatini1985), and HYPERQUAD (Gans et al., Reference Gans, Sabatini and Vacca1996). All of these programs use least squares refinement to reduce the differences between calculated and experimental data to obtain the best model that gives the best fit. The sum of the squares of the residuals between experimental and calculated values is usually very small, typically between 10−6 and 10−9.

Protonation equilibria in aqueous solution

Amino acid molecules possess at least one acidic group and one basic group. This allows an intramolecular acid–base equilibrium reaction to take place, resulting in the formation of a dipolar tautomeric ion known as a zwitterion or internal salt. From the above we know that an amino acid has at least two dissociation constants, the first corresponding to the case where the COOH group is deprotonated and the second corresponding to the case where the NH3+ group is deprotonated in an aqueous solution (Jhamb et al., Reference Jhamb, Liang, Gani and Hukkerikar2018). Thus, for all amino acids, the proton association constants can be expressed as stepwise protonation constants:

$$ {\mathrm{H}}^{+}+{\mathrm{L}}^{-}\hskip0.6em \rightleftarrows \hskip0.6em \mathrm{HL}\hskip0.4em \left(\mathrm{protonation}\ \mathrm{of}\hbox{--} {\mathrm{NH}}^2\hskip0.5em \mathrm{group}\right) $$
$$ {\mathrm{H}}^{+}+\mathrm{HL}\hskip0.6em \rightleftarrows \hskip0.6em {\mathrm{H}}_2{\mathrm{L}}^{+}\left(\mathrm{protonation}\ \mathrm{of}\hbox{--} {\mathrm{COO}}^{-}\hskip0.6em \mathrm{group}\right). $$

Amino acids that are positively charged at pH 7, such as lysine, arginine, and histidine, undergo protonation equilibrium reactions:

$$ {\mathrm{H}}^{+}+{\mathrm{L}}^{-}\hskip0.6em \rightleftarrows \hskip0.6em \mathrm{HL}\;\left(\mathrm{protonation}\ \mathrm{of}\hbox{--} {\mathrm{NH}}^2\hskip0.4em \mathrm{group}\right) $$
$$ {\mathrm{H}}^{+}+\mathrm{HL}\hskip0.6em \rightleftarrows \hskip0.6em {\mathrm{H}}_2{\mathrm{L}}^{+}\left(\mathrm{protonation}\ \mathrm{of}\ \mathrm{side}\ \mathrm{chain}\right) $$
$$ {\mathrm{H}}^{+}+{\mathrm{H}}_2{\mathrm{L}}^{+}\hskip0.6em \rightleftarrows \hskip0.6em {\mathrm{H}}_3{\mathrm{L}}^{2+}\left(\mathrm{protonation}\ \mathrm{of}\hbox{--} {\mathrm{COO}}^{-}\hskip0.4em \mathrm{group}\right). $$

The representative equilibria for amino acids that are negatively charged at pH 8, including glutamic acid, aspartic acid, and cysteine:

$$ {\mathrm{H}}^{+}+{\mathrm{L}}^{2-}\hskip0.6em \rightleftarrows \hskip0.6em {\mathrm{H}\mathrm{L}}^{-}\left(\mathrm{protonation}\ \mathrm{of}\hbox{--} {\mathrm{NH}}^2\hskip0.4em \mathrm{group}\right) $$
$$ {\mathrm{H}}^{+}+{\mathrm{H}\mathrm{L}}^{-}\hskip0.6em \rightleftarrows \hskip0.6em {\mathrm{H}}_2\mathrm{L}\;\left(\mathrm{protonation}\ \mathrm{of}\ \mathrm{side}\ \mathrm{chain}\right) $$

$ {\mathrm{H}}^{+}+{\mathrm{H}}_2\mathrm{L}\hskip0.6em \rightleftarrows \hskip0.6em {\mathrm{H}}_3{\mathrm{L}}^{+}\left(\mathrm{protonation}\ \mathrm{of}\hbox{--} {\mathrm{COO}}^{-}\hskip0.4em \mathrm{group}\right) $ .

In aqueous solutions, solvent molecules act as proton acceptors and therefore play a crucial role in chemical and biochemical reactions (Murphy et al., Reference Murphy, Powell and Brumaghim2020). The study of glycine, alanine, glutamic acid, histidine, tryptophan, and leucine derivatives and their complexes is of enormous biological interest because such complexes display interesting antibacterial, antifungal, anticancer, and antiviral properties (Quyoom, Reference Quyoom2014). Leucine, isoleucine, and valine are metabolically active. In peripheral tissues, they can be oxidized to produce energy or act as anti-catabolic factors (especially leucine) by stimulating the synthesis and reducing the rate of breakdown of muscle protein (Soomro et al., Reference Soomro, Devrajani, Ghori, Lohana and Qureshi2008). L-lysine oxidase (LysOx) isolated from the extracellular growth medium of Trichoderma cf. aureoviride was reported by Pokrovsky et al. (Reference Pokrovsky, Treshalina, Lukasheva, Sedakova, Medentzev, Arinbasarova and Berezov2013) to exhibit significant cytotoxicity and antitumor activity in vitro against a panel of murine and human tumor cell lines and in vivo on murine tumors and on animals with human tumor xenografts (breast cancer SKBR3, melanoma Bro, colon cancer HCT116 and ovarian adenocarcinoma SCOV3).

Amino acids are involved in pathways that feed cancer cells and provide building blocks for cancer cell growth. The citric acid cycle (the TCA cycle) is an important mechanistic example of the involvement of amino acids in cancer. The branched-chain amino acids and threonine fuel the TCA cycle intermediates, resulting in the release of ATP and providing the energy required for oncogenic activities. Cancer cells also use valine, leucine, and isoleucine as ‘alternative fuels’ to compete with other cells in the tumor stroma for energy and to optimize nutrient use during tumor development (Green et al., Reference Green, Wallace, Divakaruni, Phillips, Murphy, Ciaraldi and Metallo2016). The recently discovered V-9302, a selective inhibitor of a glutamine transporter ASCT2, showed anti-tumor activity in vivo, demonstrating the utility of a pharmacological agent in oncology (Schulte et al., Reference Schulte, Fu, Zhao, Li, Geng, Smith and Manning2018). Cysteine uptake also plays an important role in breast cancer by maintaining redox balance and numerous studies have shown the efficacy of xCT inhibition on tumor growth (Timmerman et al., Reference Timmerman, Holton, Yuneva, Louie, Padró, Daemen and Gray2013). Amino acids also form derivatives that contribute to tumor growth and metastasis. Arginine-derived polyamines alter gene expression by modulating global chromatin structure and cancer cell proliferation (Pegg, Reference Pegg2009). Kynurenine, derived from tryptophan, induces immunosuppression by binding to and activating the aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR) transcription factor. This impairs the ability of immune-tolerant dendritic cells (DCs) and regulatory T cells to target and eliminate cancer cells (Fallarino et al., Reference Fallarino, Grohmann, Hwang, Orabona, Vacca, Bianchi, Belladonna, Fioretti, Alegre and Puccetti2003).

In addition to the direct involvement of amino acids and their derivatives in metabolic reprogramming processes, amino acids are also fundamental in mediating epigenetic regulation and post-transcriptional modification. For example, DNA and histone methylation are regulated by balanced metabolite levels in the methionine cycle, which is influenced by methionine, serine, and glycine (Maddocks et al., Reference Maddocks, Athineos, Cheung, Lee, Zhang, Van Den Broek and Vousden2017).

The protonation constants of the aqueous amino acids are required to determine the stability constants of metal-amino acid complexes. Aiyelabola et al. prepared coordination complexes of aspartic acid in both basic and acidic media, for Mn2+: L in a stoichiometric ratio of 1: 2. The antimicrobial activity of the compound [Mn2+(asp)2] was antibacterial and antifungal (Aiyelabola et al., Reference Aiyelabola, Isabirye, Akinkunmi, Ogunkunle and Ojo2016). Jasmin et al. synthesized a ligand Cu2+ complex by condensation reaction of isatin for cysteine, glycine, leucine, and alanine. The ligand Cu2+ complex was tested in antimicrobial studies using the disk diffusion method. All synthesized complexes exhibited strong antibacterial activity (Shampa et al., Reference Shampa, Islam, Hossain, Rahman, Zakaria and Zahan2017).

Al Naimi et al. synthesized complexes of Mn2+, Co2+, Zn2+, Cd2+, and Hg2+ with mixed ligands of 5-chlorosalicylic acid and L-valine. The results obtained in antibacterial studies of models through agar well diffusion bioassay evidenced the biological efficacy of ligands as well complexes (Al Naimi et al., Reference Al Naimi, Kindeel, Jarad and Al-Noor2016). Mixed iron(III) and zinc(II) complexes with isonitrosoacetophenone (HINAP) and histidine, proline, and phenylalanine were formed and characterized. The antimicrobial activity was evaluated against bacteria (Bacillus subtilis, Staphylococcus aureus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Escherichia coli), and Candida albicans fungi. The Fe2+ and Zn2+complexes were more active against Gram+ bacteria than Gram- bacteria. They also showed a significant inhibitory effect on the fungi tested. In vitro antitumor activity assayed against HEP2-type cancer cell lines (laryngeal cancer cells) showed significant toxicity of the ligands and their mixed complexes (Rahmouni et al., Reference Rahmouni, el Houda Bensiradj, Megatli, Djebbar and Baitich2019).

A potentiometric titration technique was used to determine the protonation constants of glycine, leucine, methionine, phenylalanine, tryptophan, asparagine, glutamine (T = 25 °C, I = 0.1 M KCl) (İnci and Aydın, Reference İnci and Aydın2021); cysteine, tyrosine, histidine, lysine (T = 25 °C, I = 0.1 M NaCl) (El-Sherif et al., Reference El-Sherif, Shoukry, Abd Elkarim and Barakat2014); alanine, serine, isoleucine, threonine, valine (T = 25 °C, I = 0.1 M NaClO4) (El-Sherif et al., Reference El-Sherif, Shoukry, Abd Elkarim and Barakat2014); methylcystein, methylselenocysteine, selenomethionine (T = 25 °C, I = 0.1 M NaClO4) (Murphy et al., Reference Murphy, Gaertner, Williams, McMillen, Powell and Brumaghim2019); proline, arginine, glutamic acid, aspartic acid, 3,4-dihydroxyphenylalanine, hydroxyproline (T = 25 °C) (Burger, Reference Burger1990); substituted salicylaldehyde amino acid (Sal–alanine, SalCl–alanine, SalBr–alanine, Sal–glycine, SalCl–glycine, SalBr–glycine, Sal–serine, Sal–tyrosine, Sal–phenylalanine) (T = 25 °C, I = 0.1 M KCl) (El-Sherif and Aljahdali, Reference El-Sherif and Aljahdali2013) in aqueous solution (Table 1).

Table 1. Protonation constants of L-amino acids in water, ethanol– water mixtures (E), dioxane–water mixtures (D), and dimethyl sulfoxide–water media (DMSO)

Sal-amino acid, substituted salicylaldehyde amino acid. The % is expressed as volume.

Protonation equilibria of amino acids in a mixed medium (ethanol–water, dioxane–water, dimethyl sulfoxide–water)

Water–organic solvent mixtures have attracted much interest due to their frequent use and a wide range of applications (reaction media for a variety of organic and analytical processes such as synthesis, titrations, or liquid chromatographic separations). Therefore, studies in media other than water provide insight into the chemistry of bioligands in living organisms (Diaz-Cruz et al., Reference Diaz-Cruz, Diaz-Cruz, Mendieta, Tauler and Esteban2000).

Ethanol is the closest organic solvent to water in terms of structure and properties and therefore the behavior of dissociation or protonation in ethanol is similar to that in aqueous solution. The water–ethanol mixture is of very interesting binary character. One reason for this is that ethanol dissolves most organic acids and bases better than water. Solvents such as water–ethanol mixtures are thus a better model for in vivo reactions (Crosby et al., Reference Crosby, Stone and Lienhard1970; Hughes et al., Reference Hughes, Bergan and Grabowski1986) because the mixtures possess both a low polar character and partially aqueous fractions, as in all biological systems. Their mixtures are macroscopically homogeneous, but it has been reported that the water and organic solvent molecules are not microscopically homogeneously dispersed due to the formation of hydrogen bonding networks and hydrophobic interactions. Consequently, the molecular composition of the solvation layer around a solute molecule is not the same as the bulk mixing ratio of water and organic solvent (Canel et al., Reference Canel, Gültepe, Doğan and Kilıç2006).

Mixed solvents, such as mixtures of water and dioxane, provide an even better model for in vivo reactions because they are not only less polar than pure water, but also partially aqueous, as in all biological systems (Fiol et al., Reference Fiol, Brandariz and Vicente1995). These mixtures are a favorite mixed solvent system in which to study the association and mobility of ions because the dielectric constant can be varied over a wide range. Changes in protonation constants upon the addition of 1,4-dioxane to aqueous solutions are due to increased ion–ion interactions and changes in solvent–ion and solvent–solvent interactions (Roy et al., Reference Roy, Sinha, Dey and Sinha2005).

The use of a water–DMSO mixture has several advantages: (a) the DMSO–water 50%: 50% mixture has a low hygroscopic character (pure DMSO is very hygroscopic and it is difficult to control its water content); (b) compatibility with the standard glass electrode, so that pH measurements can be carried out in a similar way to a purely aqueous solution; (c) a wide acidity range (pk w = 15.50), which allows the study of deprotonation equilibria of weak acids that are difficult to study in water (Hernández-Molina et al., Reference Hernández-Molina, Mederos, Gili, Domínguez, Núñez, Germain and Debaerdemaeker1997).

The autoprotolysis constant (K ap) of a solvent is an important parameter in understanding acid–base equilibria in mixed solvents. It determines the extreme limits of acidity and basicity in a given solvent medium. Kilic and Aslan derived a convenient and rapid potentiometric technique using a combined glass pH electrode for the determination of autoprotolysis constants in a variety of aqueous-organic mixed solvents (Kiliç and Aslan, Reference Kiliç and Aslan2005).

Ciolan et al. synthesized the binuclear complex [M2L(AcO)2(H2O)4] (M = Cu2+, Ni2+, Co2+, Mn2+ and L = (C39H34N4O6)2−) from 1,3-bis(2′-formylphenyl)-1,3-dioxapropane, L-tryptophan and metal acetate in methanolic medium. The complex [Cu2L(AcO)2(H2O)4] was the most effective in terms of antimicrobial efficacy and microbial spectra (Ciolan et al., Reference Ciolan, Patron, Marutescu and Chifiriuc2015). Mabrouk et al. synthesized and characterized Co2+ complexes of the Schiff base with salicylaldehyde and three amino acids (valine, leucine, isoleucine) in an ethyl alcohol solution. The metal: ligand ratio was 1: 2. Schiff bases and complexes were tested against different strains of microbes to determine their biological effects. Co(II) complexes showed greater bacterial activity against most bacterial species and the fungus C. albicans (Salama et al., Reference Salama, Ahmed and Hassan2017). Obaid et al. prepared novel mixed metal–ligand complexes for metal(II) chloride (Co2+, Ni2+, Cu2+, Zn2+, Cd2+, Hg2+) (L = glycine: alanine: valine) using 50% ethanolic solution as well as 50% distilled water in a molar ratio of 1:1:1:1. The Cd+2 complex had a higher antibacterial activity than the other complexes (Obaid et al., Reference Obaid, Al Naemi and Al-Hamdani2018). Bougherra et al. prepared Cu2+ complexes for dimethylglyoxime as well as the tryptophan, glutamate, proline, arginine, and valine. The antimicrobial activity of ligand complexes was tested using the agar diffusion technique with DMSO as solvent against pathogenic bacteria and fungi. The complexes were more antimicrobial than the free ligand. Metal chelation significantly affected the antimicrobial activity of the ligands (Bougherra et al., Reference Bougherra, Berradj, Adkhis and Amrouche2018).

The protonation constants of cysteine, tyrosine, histidine, lysine, tryptophan (T = 25 °C, I = 0.1 M NaCl) (El-Sherif et al., Reference El-Sherif, Shoukry, Abd Elkarim and Barakat2014); glycine, alanine, valine, leucine, isoleucine, phenylalanine, serine, methionine (T = 25 °C, I = 0.1 M NaClO4) (El-Sherif et al., Reference El-Sherif, Shoukry, Abd Elkarim and Barakat2014) in various ethanol–water mixtures; leucine, isoleucine, serine, threonine (T = 25 °C, I = 0.1 M NaClO4) (El-Sherif et al., Reference El-Sherif, Shoukry, Abd Elkarim and Barakat2014) in dioxane–water mixtures; alanine, valine, leucine, threonine, phenylalanine, serine, methionine (T = 25 °C, I = 0.1 M NaNO3) (El-Sherif et al., Reference El-Sherif, Shoukry, Abd Elkarim and Barakat2014) in DMSO–water media are given in Table 1.

Conclusions

The determination of protonation constants is fundamental to understanding the behavior of amino acids and their interaction with metal ions in aqueous and mixed solutions. Protonation constants are important physicochemical parameters that can provide information about the drug’s properties such as solubility, lipophilicity, acidity, and alkalinity (Meloun et al., Reference Meloun, Bordovská and Vrána2007; Roda et al., Reference Roda, Dallanoce, Grazioso, Liberti and De Amici2010).

Amino acids, which are the building blocks of peptides and proteins, are essential chemicals needed by the body for optimal metabolism and proper functioning. Amino acids are involved in various physiological processes such as skeletal muscle function, atrophic conditions, sarcopenia, and cancer. They play a key role in cell signaling, homeostasis, gene expression, hormone synthesis, protein phosphorylation and possess antioxidant properties. Amino acids are also important precursors in the synthesis of low molecular weight nitrogenous compounds. The presence of amino acids and their metabolites, such as glutathione, polyamines, taurine, serotonin, and thyroid hormones, at physiological levels is important for proper body function. Amino acids are also essential for redox balance, energy regulation, and biosynthetic support. In addition, amino acid derivatives contribute to epigenetic regulation and immune responses associated with tumorigenesis and metastasis.

As technology continues to advance, future research into the determination of ligand protonation constants is expected to seamlessly integrate experimental and computational approaches. Factors such as solvent effects, temperature and the presence of competing ions can complicate the accuracy of results. However, researchers are addressing these challenges by developing sophisticated computational methods that simulate the behavior of ligands in different environments, providing a complementary approach to experimental data. The development of high-throughput methods and the exploration of new spectroscopic techniques will further enhance the ability to characterize complex equilibria in solution.

This review highlights the importance of amino acid protonation constants from coordination chemistry to drug design. As researchers continue to push the boundaries of knowledge, a deeper understanding of protonation constants will undoubtedly contribute to the development of innovative solutions and applications in various scientific fields. The review highlights the importance of continued exploration in this field, where each discovery brings us closer to a comprehensive understanding of the molecular world immersed in aqueous and mixed environments.

Acknowledgments

We offer our thanks to Joanna Gądek-Sobczyńska.

Financial support

Financial support of this work by the Medical University of Lodz (statutory Fund No. 503/3-014-02/503-31-001; statutory Fund No. 503/1-156-04/503-11-001 – JakubFichna) is gratefully acknowledged.

Competing interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

Aiyelabola, TO, Isabirye, DA, Akinkunmi, EO, Ogunkunle, OA and Ojo, IAO (2016) Synthesis, characterization, and antimicrobial activities of coordination compounds of aspartic acid. Journal of Chemistry 2016, 8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Al Naimi, SMH, Kindeel, AS, Jarad, AJ and Al-Noor, TH (2016) Synthesis and antibacterial activities of some mixed ligand complexes. Transactions on Engineering and Sciences 4(2), 4247.Google Scholar
Al-Awadi, NA, Shuaib, NM, Abbas, AB, El-Sherif, AA, El-Dissouky, A and Al-Saleh, E (2008) Synthesis, characterization, and biological activity of N1-methyl-2-(1H-1,2,3-benzotriazol-1-y1)-3-oxobutan-ethioamide complexes with some divalent metal (II) ions. Bioinorganic Chemistry and Applications 2008, 479897.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
AlJahdali, M, AbedelKarim, AT, El-Sherif, AA and Ahmed, MM (2014) Synthesis, characterization, equilibrium studies, and biological activity of complexes involving copper(II), 2-aminomethylthiophenyl-4-bromosalicylaldehyde Schiff base, and selected amino acids. Journal of Coordination Chemistry 67, 870890.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aljahdali, M and El-Sherif, AA (2012) Equilibrium studies of binary and mixed-ligand complexes of zinc (II) involving 2-(aminomethyl)-benzimidazole and some bio-relevant ligands. Journal of Solution Chemistry 41, 17591776.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barbosa, D, Barron, JL, Beltrán, J and Sanz-Nebot, V (1995) PKPOT, a program for the potentiometric study of ionic equilibria in aqueous and non-aqueous media. Analytica Chimica Acta 317(1–3), 7581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berthon, G (1995) Handbook of metal-ligand interactions in biological fluids, bioinorganic chemistry.Google Scholar
Bougherra, H, Berradj, O, Adkhis, A and Amrouche, T (2018) Synthesis, characterization, electrochemical and biological activities of mixed ligand copper (II) complexes with dimethylglyoxime and amino acids. Journal of Molecular Structure 1173, 280290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burger, K (1990) Biocoordination chemistry: Coordination equilibria in biologically active systems.Google Scholar
Canel, E, Gültepe, A, Doğan, A and Kilıç, E (2006) The determination of protonation constants of some amino acids and their esters by potentiometry in different media. Journal of Solution Chemistry 35, 519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ciolan, F, Patron, LUMINIŢA, Marutescu, L and Chifiriuc, MC (2015) Synthesis, characterization and biological activity of Cu (II), Ni (II), Co (II) AND Mn (II) binuclear complexes derived from 1, 3-bis (2′-formylphenyl)-1, 3-dioxapropane and L-tryptophan. Farmacia 63(1), 8692.Google Scholar
Crosby, J, Stone, R and Lienhard, GE (1970) Mechanisms of thiamine-catalyzed reactions. Decarboxylation of 2-(1-carboxy-l-hydroxyethyl)-3, 4-dimethylthiazolium chloride. Journal of the American Chemical Society 92(9), 28912900.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diaz-Cruz, MS, Diaz-Cruz, JM, Mendieta, J, Tauler, R and Esteban, M (2000) Soft-and hard-modeling approaches for the determination of stability constants of metal–peptide systems by voltammetry. Analytical Biochemistry 279(2), 189201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
El-Sherif, AA (2011) Coordination properties of bidentate (N,O) and tridentate (N,O,O) heterocyclic alcohols with dimethyltin(IV). Journal of Coordination Chemistry 64(7), 12401253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
El-Sherif, AA (2012) Kinetics and mechanism for hydrolysis of α-amino acid esters in mixed ligand complexes with Zn (II)–Nitrilo-tris (methyl phosphonic acid). Journal of Solution Chemistry 41, 249260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
El-Sherif, AA and Aljahdali, MS (2013) Protonation, complex-formation equilibria, and metal–ligand interaction of salicylaldehyde Schiff bases. Journal of Coordination Chemistry 66(19), 34233468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
El-Sherif, AA, Shehata, MR, Shoukry, MM and Barakat, MH (2012a) Thermodynamic investigation and mixed ligand complex formation of 1, 4-Bis-(3-aminopropyl)-piperazine and biorelevant ligands. Bioinorganic Chemistry and Applications 2012, 984291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
El-Sherif, AA, Shoukry, MM, Abd Elkarim, AT and Barakat, MH (2014) Protonation equilibria of biologically active ligands in mixed aqueous organic solvents. Bioinorganic Chemistry and Applications 2014, 626719.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
El-Sherif, AA, Shoukry, MM, Hosny, WM and Abd-Elmoghny, MG (2012b) Complex formation equilibria of unusual seven-coordinate Fe (EDTA) complexes with DNA constituents and related bio-relevant ligands. Journal of Solution Chemistry 41, 813827.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fallarino, F, Grohmann, U, Hwang, KW, Orabona, C, Vacca, C, Bianchi, R, Belladonna, ML, Fioretti, MC, Alegre, ML, Puccetti, P (2003) Modulation of tryptophan catabolism by regulatory T cells. Nature Immunology 4(12), 12061212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fiol, S, Brandariz, I and Vicente, ME (1995) The ionization constants of α-alanine in NaCl at 25°. Effect of the ionic strength based on three models. Talanta 42, 797801.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flaschka, H (1974) Determination of pH. Theory and Practice, 2nd Edn. New York: R. G. Bates. Wiley.Google Scholar
Gans, P, Sabatini, A and Vacca, A (1976) An improved computer program for the computation of formation constants from potentiometric data. Inorganica Chimica Acta 18, 237239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gans, P, Sabatini, A and Vacca, A (1985) SUPERQUAD: An improved general program for computation of formation constants from potentiometric data. Journal of the Chemical Society, Dalton Transactions 6, 11951200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gans, P, Sabatini, A and Vacca, A (1996) Investigation of equilibria in solution. Determination of equilibrium constants with the HYPERQUAD suite of programs. Talanta 43(10), 17391753.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, CR, Wallace, M, Divakaruni, AS, Phillips, SA, Murphy, AN, Ciaraldi, TP and Metallo, CM (2016) Branched-chain amino acid catabolism fuels adipocyte differentiation and lipogenesis. Nature Chemical Biology 12(1), 1521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hernández-Molina, R, Mederos, A, Gili, P, Domínguez, S, Núñez, P, Germain, G and Debaerdemaeker, T (1997) Coordinating ability in DMSO-water 80: 20 wt./wt. of the Schiff base N, N′-3, 4-toluenebis (salicylideneimine) with divalent cations. Crystal structure of the nickel (II) complex. Inorganica Chimica Acta 256(2), 319325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hughes, DL, Bergan, JJ and Grabowski, EJJ (1986) Amino acid chemistry in dipolar aprotic solvents: Dissociation constants and ambident reactivity. Journal of Organic Chemistry 51(13), 25792585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
İnci, D and Aydın, R (2021) Equilibria studies on nickel (II) complexes with 1, 10-phenanthroline derivatives and some amino acids in aqueous solution. Journal of Solution Chemistry 50, 128146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jhamb, S, Liang, X, Gani, R and Hukkerikar, AS (2018) Estimation of physical properties of amino acids by group-contribution method. Chemical Engineering Science 175, 148161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kiliç, E and Aslan, N (2005) Determination of autoprotolysis constants of water-organic solvent mixtures by potentiometry. Microchimica Acta 151, 8992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kozłowski, H, Bal, W, Dyba, M and Kowalik-Jankowska, T (1999) Specific structure–stability relations in metallopeptides. Coordination Chemistry Reviews 184(1), 319346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liptay, W, Rossotti, FJC and Rossotti, H (1962) The Determination of Stability Constants and Other Equilibrium Constants in Solution. New York: McGraw-Hill Book (Series in Advanced Chemistry).Google Scholar
Maddocks, OD, Athineos, D, Cheung, EC, Lee, P, Zhang, T, Van Den Broek, NJ, … and Vousden, KH (2017) Modulating the therapeutic response of tumours to dietary serine and glycine starvation. Nature 544(7650), 372376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martell, AE and Calvin, M (1952) Chemistry of the metal chelate compounds. Soil Science 74, 403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martell, AE and Motekaitis, RJ (1992) Determination and use of stability constants.Google Scholar
Meloun, M, Bordovská, S and Vrána, A (2007) The thermodynamic dissociation constants of the anticancer drugs camptothecine, 7-ethyl-10-hydroxycamptothecine, 10-hydroxycamptothecine and 7-ethylcamptothecine by the least-squares nonlinear regression of multiwavelength spectrophotometric pH-titration data. Analytica Chimica Acta 584(2), 419432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Motekaitis, RJ and Martell, AE (1982) BEST—A new program for rigorous calculation of equilibrium parameters of complex multicomponent systems. Canadian Journal of Chemistry 60(19), 24032409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murphy, JM, Gaertner, AA, Williams, T, McMillen, CD, Powell, BA and Brumaghim, JL (2019) Stability constant determination of sulfur and selenium amino acids with Cu (II) and Fe (II). Journal of Inorganic Biochemistry 195, 2030.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murphy, JM, Powell, BA and Brumaghim, JL (2020) Stability constants of bio-relevant, redox-active metals with amino acids: The challenges of weakly binding ligands. Coordination Chemistry Reviews 412, 213253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Obaid, SM, Al Naemi, HAS and Al-Hamdani, AAS (2018) Synthesis, spectroscopic and antimicrobial studies of mixed ligand metal (II) complexes with three amino acids. Research Journal of Pharmaceutical Biological and Chemical Sciences 9(6), 1560.Google Scholar
Partanen, JI (1998) Calculation of the first and second stoichiometric dissociation constants of glycine in aqueous sodium chloride solutions at 298.15 K. Berichte der Bunsengesellschaft für Physikalische Chemie 102(6), 855865.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pegg, AE (2009) Mammalian polyamine metabolism and function. IUBMB Life 61(9), 880894.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pokrovsky, VS, Treshalina, HM, Lukasheva, EV, Sedakova, LA, Medentzev, AG, Arinbasarova, AY and Berezov, TT (2013) Enzymatic properties and anticancer activity of L-lysine α-oxidase from Trichoderma cf. aureoviride Rifai BKMF-4268D. Anti-Cancer Drugs 24(8), 846851.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quyoom, S (2014) Studies of some mixed ligand ternary metal complexes of N acetyl cysteine with Zinc (II) and Nickel (II) metal ions. Research Journal of Chemical Sciences 4, 3235.Google Scholar
Rahmouni, NT, el Houda Bensiradj, N, Megatli, SA, Djebbar, S and Baitich, OB (2019) New mixed amino acids complexes of iron (III) and zinc (II) with isonitrosoacetophenone: Synthesis, spectral characterization, DFT study and anticancer activity. Spectrochimica Acta Part A: Molecular and Biomolecular Spectroscopy 213, 235248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roda, G, Dallanoce, C, Grazioso, G, Liberti, V and De Amici, M (2010) Determination of acid dissociation constants of compounds active at neuronal nicotinic acetylcholine receptors by means of electrophoretic and potentiometric techniques. Analytical Sciences: The International Journal of the Japan Society for Analytical Chemistry 26(1), 5154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rossotti, H (1978) The study of ionic equilibria: An introduction.Google Scholar
Roy, MN, Sinha, B, Dey, R and Sinha, A (2005) Solute–solvent and solute–solute interactions of resorcinol in mixed 1, 4-dioxane–water systems at different temperatures. International Journal of Thermophysics 26(5), 15491563.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sabatini, A, Vacca, A and Gans, P (1974) Miniquad—A general computer programme for the computation of formation constants from potentiometric data. Talanta 21(1), 5377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salama, MM, Ahmed, SG and Hassan, SS (2017) Synthesis, characterizations, biological, and molecular docking studies of some amino acid Schiff bases with their cobalt (II) complexes. Advances in Biological Chemistry 7(05), 182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schulte, ML, Fu, A, Zhao, P, Li, J, Geng, L, Smith, ST, … Manning, HC (2018) Pharmacological blockade of ASCT2-dependent glutamine transport leads to antitumor efficacy in preclinical models. Nature Medicine 24(2), 194202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shampa, JA, Islam, MR, Hossain, MS, Rahman, GT, Zakaria, CM and Zahan, MK (2017) Physiochemical and antibacterial activity investigation on Noble Schiff base cu (II) complex. American Journal of Heterocyclic Chemistry 3(4), 3741.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shimazaki, Y, Takani, M and Yamauchi, O (2009) Metal complexes of amino acids and amino acid side chain groups. Structures and properties. Dalton Transactions 38, 78547869.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sigel, H and Martin, RB (1982) Coordinating properties of the amide bond. Stability and structure of metal ion complexes of peptides and related ligands. Chemical Reviews 82, 385426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soomro, AA, Devrajani, BR, Ghori, RA, Lohana, H and Qureshi, GA (2008) Role of branched chain amino acids in the management of hepatic encephalopathy. World Journal of Medical Sciences 3(2), 6064.Google Scholar
Timmerman, LA, Holton, T, Yuneva, M, Louie, RJ, Padró, M, Daemen, A, … Gray, JW (2013) Glutamine sensitivity analysis identifies the xCT antiporter as a common triple-negative breast tumor therapeutic target. Cancer Cell 24(4), 450465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vacca, A and Sabatini, A (1985) MINIQUAD and MIQUV: Two approaches for the computation of formation constants from potentiometric data. In Computational Methods for the Determination of Formation Constants. Boston, MA: Springer US, pp. 99157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woermann, D (1973) R. G. Bates: Determination of pH, Theory and Practice, 2nd Edn. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Zhou, T, Jhamb, S, Liang, X, Sundmacher, K and Gani, R (2018) Prediction of acid dissociation constants of organic compounds using group contribution methods. Chemical Engineering Science 183, 95105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Figure 0

Table 1. Protonation constants of L-amino acids in water, ethanol– water mixtures (E), dioxane–water mixtures (D), and dimethyl sulfoxide–water media (DMSO)