Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T14:04:20.688Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Radio Observations of the Einstein Deep X-ray Field in Pavo

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 April 2016

T. R. Bedding
Affiliation:
School of Physics, University of Sydney, NSW 2006
A. J. Turtle
Affiliation:
School of Physics, University of Sydney, NSW 2006

Abstract

The most sensitive X-ray survey available is a deep exposure made by the Einstein Observatory of a 40 arcmin field in the southern constellation of Pavo. This survey revealed 33 X-ray sources, most of which were optically identified with quasars. Here, we report radio observations of the Pavo region at 843 MHz made with the Molonglo Observatory Synthesis Telescope. Eight overlapping fields were combined to produce the most sensitive radio map of the region to date, revealing 33 radio sources above a flux density of 2.4 mJy. Only one of these radio sources corresponded to an X-ray object: a quasar at z = 1.13. We also used the Parkes-Tidbinbilla Interferometer, at 2.29 GHz and 8.41 GHz, to observe some of the stronger radio sources.

From these multi-wavelength observations of the Pavo field it is apparent that, to the sensitivity of the surveys involved, (i) there is little correlation between X-ray and radio detections, and (ii) most of the X-ray sources have optical counterparts while few of the radio ones do, and (iii) there is some confirmation that X-ray emission is higher for objects with flat radio spectra (i.e., a dominant core) than for steep spectrum sources.

Type
Extragalactic
Copyright
Copyright © Astronomical Society of Australia 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Batty, M. J., Jauncey, D. L., Rayner, P. T. and Gulkis, S., 1979, Proc. Astron. Soc. Aust., 3, 400.Google Scholar
Bolton, J. G. and Butler, P. W., 1975, Aust. J. Phys. Astrophys. Suppl., 34, 33.Google Scholar
Fanti, C., Fanti, R., Ficarra, A., Gregorini, L., Mantovani, F. and Padrielli, L., 1983, Astron. Astrophys., 118, 171.Google Scholar
Giacconi, R., Gursky, H. and Paolini, F. R., 1962, Phys. Rev. Lett., 9, 439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giacconi, R. et al., 1979, Astrophys. J., 234, L1.Google Scholar
Griffiths, R. E. et al., 1983, Astrophys. J., 269, 375.Google Scholar
Griffiths, R. E., Brissenden, R., Hewitt, P., Murray, S. S., Tuohy, I. and Ward, M., 1986, Bull. Am. Astron. Soc., 18, 1046.Google Scholar
Large, M. I., Mills, B. Y., Little, A. G., Crawford, D. F. and Sutton, J. M., 1981, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc., 194, 693.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mills, B. Y., 1981, Proc. Astron. Soc. Aust., 4, 156.Google Scholar
Murdoch, H. S., 1976, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc., 177, 441.Google Scholar
Norris, R. P., Kesteven, M. J., Wellington, K. J. and Batty, M. J., 1988, Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser., 67, 85.Google Scholar
Subrahmanya, C. R. and Mills, B. Y., 1986, in IAU Symposium 124, Observational Cosmology, eds. Hewitt, A., Burbidge, G. and Fang, L. Z., (Dordrecht: Reidel), p. 569.Google Scholar
Tyson, J. A. and Jarvis, J. F., 1979, Astrophys. J., 230, L153.Google Scholar
Windhorst, R. A., Dressler, A. and Koo, D. C., 1986, in IAU Symposium 124, Observational Cosmology, eds. Hewitt, A. Burbidge, G. and Fang, L. Z., (Dordrecht: Reidel), p. 573.Google Scholar
Worrall, D. M., Giommi, P., Tananbaum, H. and Zamorani, G., 1987, Astrophys. J., 313, 596.Google Scholar