Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T20:54:18.176Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Astronomy on Ice

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 April 2016

Martin A. Pomerantz
Martin A. Pomerantz*
Affiliation:
Bartol Research Foundation of the Franklin Institute University of Delaware, Newark, DE 19716, U.S.A.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The geographic South Pole, where the United States maintains a year-round scientific station, affords a number of unique advantages for certain types of astronomical observations. These include: continuous viewing and constant declination of ail objects in the southern celestial hemisphere, exceedingly low humidity, extended periods of coronal seeing, high altitude, and uniform terrain. The areas of research that have already benefited immensely from thèse extraordinary features are helioseismology and submillimeter astronomy. Unparalleled observations of global solar oscillations have already yielded significant information about the structure and dynamics of the Sun’s interior. Far infrared measurements of various galactic and extra-galactic regions have attained an unprecedented level of sensitivity, limited for the first time only by the noise inherent in the detector. In addition to further helioseismological observations, currently planned future activities include observational cosmology and ultra high energy gamma ray astronomy.

Type
Invited Papers
Information
Publications of the Astronomical Society of Australia , Volume 6 , Issue 4 , 1986 , pp. 403 - 415
Copyright
Copyright © Astronomical Society of Australia 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ando, H. and Osaki, Y., 1975, Pubi. Astron. Soc. Japan, 27, 581.Google Scholar
Bahcall, J. N., Huebner, Walter F., Lubow, Stephen H., Parker, Peter D. and Ulrich, Roger K., 1982, Revs, of Mod. Phys., 54, 767.Google Scholar
Baltrusaitis, R. M., G. L. Cassiday, R., Cooper, J. W. Elbert, P. R. Gerhardy, E. C. Loh, Y., Mizumoto, P., Sokolsky, P. Sommers and Stack, D., 1985, Astrophys. J. Letters, 293, L69.Google Scholar
Deubner, F., 1975, Astron. Astrophys., 44, 371.Google Scholar
Dicke, R. H.and Goldenberg, H. M., 1967, Phys. Rev. Letters, 18, 313.Google Scholar
Dowthwaite, J., C, A. B. Harrison, I. W. Kirkman, H. J. Macrae, K. J., Orford Turver, K. E. and Walmsley, M., 1984, Nature, 309, 691.Google Scholar
Jr.Duvall, T. L., Harvey, J. W. and Pomerantz, M. A., 1986, Nature, 321, 500.Google Scholar
Fossat, E., 1974, Astron. Astrophys. Supp., 15, 475.Google Scholar
Gorham, P. W., Cowley, D. J. M. F., Fegan, K. G. Cribbs, S., Kenny, R. C. Lamb, D. F. Liebing, N. A. Porter Stenger, V. J. and Weekes, T. C., 1986, Astrophys. J., to be published.Google Scholar
Grec, G., Fossat, E. and Vernin, J., 1976, Astron. Astrophys., 50, 221.Google Scholar
Grec, G., Fossat, E. and Pomerantz, M., 1980, Nature, 288, 541.Google Scholar
Grec, Gerard, Fossat, Eric and Pomerantz, Martin A., 1983, Solar Phys., 82, 55.Google Scholar
Harvey, J., Pomerantz, M. and Jr.Duvall, T., 1982, Sky and Telescope, 64, 520.Google Scholar
Hill, H. A.and Stebbins, R. T., 1975, Astrophys. J., 200, 471.Google Scholar
Hillas, A. M., 1984, Nature, 312, 50.Google Scholar
Hillas, A. M., 1985, 19th Int’l. Cosmic Ray Conf., La Jolla, CA.Google Scholar
Kusoffsky, U. and Pomerantz, M. A., 1980, Wayman, Patrick A., ed., Highlights of Astronomy, 5, 89.Google Scholar
Leighton, R., 1961, IAU Symposium No. 12, Nuovo Cimento Suppl., 22.Google Scholar
Mezger, P. G., Mathis, J. S., Panagia, N., 1982, Astron. Astrophys., 105, 372.Google Scholar
Pajot, F., Puget, R.J. L., Gispert Lamarre, J. M.and Pomerantz, M. A., 1985, Bulletin of the American Physical Society.Google Scholar
Pomerantz, Martin A., Grec, Gerard and Fossat, Eric, 1980, Antarctic J., XV, 200.Google Scholar
Pomerantz, Martin A., Harvey, John W. and Jr.Duvall, Thomas, 1982, Antarctic J., XVII, 232.Google Scholar
Pomerantz, Martin A.F., Gispert, Pajot R. and Lamarre, J. M., 1986, Antarctic J., in press.Google Scholar
Protheroe, R. J., Clay, R. W. and Gerhardy, P. R., 1984, Astrophys.J. (Letters), 280, L47.Google Scholar
Puget, J. L., Léger, A., Boulanger, F., 1985, Astron. Astrophys. Letters., 142, L19.Google Scholar
Rouan, D., 1979, Astron. Astrophys. Letters, 142, L19.Google Scholar
Rowley, J. K., Clevel, B. T. and Jr.Davis, R., 1985, Proc, Am. Inst. of Phys. Conf., No. 126, Cherry, M. L., Fowler, W. A. and Lande, K., eds.Google Scholar
Samorski, M. and Stamm, W., 1983, Astrophys. J. Letters., 268, L17.Google Scholar
Sellgren, K., Werner, M. W., Dinerstein, H. L., 1983, Astrophys. J. Letters, 271, L13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Uson, J. M.and Wilkinson, D. T., 1984, Nature, 312, 427.Google Scholar
Westphal, J., 1974, Final Report, NASA Grant NGR 05-002-185.Google Scholar
Woodard, M. and Hudson, H., 1983, Solar Phys., 82, 67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar