Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T12:43:54.877Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Two cognitive systems simultaneously prepared for opposite events

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 November 1999

WALTER RITTER
Affiliation:
Department of Neuroscience, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York, USA
ELYSE SUSSMAN
Affiliation:
Department of Neuroscience, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York, USA
DIANA DEACON
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, City College of New York, New York, USA
NELSON COWAN
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Missouri, Columbia, USA
HERBERT G. VAUGHAN
Affiliation:
Department of Neuroscience, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York, USA
Get access

Abstract

Event-related potentials (ERPs) were recorded during a go/no-go reaction time (RT) task in which subjects responded to rare target tones and withheld response to frequent tones. In a predictable condition, a rare visual stimulus signalled the impending occurrence of a rare tone, whereas a frequent visual stimulus signalled that a frequent tone would be presented. The rare visual stimuli elicited P3, associated with violations of expectations, whereas the rare tones, being predictable, did not. The rare tones elicited the mismatch negativity (MMN), a component associated with preattentive deviance detection, despite the fact that they were expected. RT was faster in the predictable condition than in another condition in which the tones were not predictable. The P3 and RT data indicate, respectively, that subjects anticipated and were ready to respond to the target tones. The MMN result indicates that immediately before target tones, the preattentive system underlying the MMN was set for frequent tones, being unaffected by the information available to the higher order system. Thus, the higher order cognitive system associated with P3 and the lower order cognitive system associated with the MMN were prepared simultaneously for opposite events.

Type
SPECIAL REPORT
Copyright
© 1999 Society for Psychophysiological Research

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)