Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T21:26:45.016Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Learned maintenance of pain: Muscle tension reduces central nervous system processing of painful stimulation in chronic and subchronic pain patients

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 November 1999

BÄRBEL KNOST
Affiliation:
Institute of Medical Psychology and Behavioral Neurobiology, University of Tübingen, Germany
HERTA FLOR
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Humboldt-University, Berlin, Germany
NIELS BIRBAUMER
Affiliation:
Institute of Medical Psychology and Behavioral Neurobiology, University of Tübingen, Germany Department of General Psychology, University of Padua, Italy
MARKUS M. SCHUGENS
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Bochum, Germany
Get access

Abstract

The effect of level of muscle tension on the perception of painful stimuli was assessed in 13 chronic back pain patients, 14 subjects at high risk for chronic back pain, and 14 matched healthy controls. Subjects received painful intracutaneous electric stimuli to the forearm or the lower back while they produced either high or low muscle tension levels. Visual analog scale (VAS) ratings of acute pain were obtained after each trial. Electroencephalograms, electromyograms, skin conductance levels, and blood pressure were measured during the trials. Although subjective pain ratings were not significantly affected by muscle tension levels, the chronic pain patients displayed elevated N150 and N150/P260 amplitudes of the somatosensory-evoked potentials in the low as compared to the high muscle tension condition. The high risk group showed a trend toward higher N150 amplitudes in the low as compared to the high tension condition. The results of this study partially support the hypothesis that increases in muscle tension might serve as a pain-reducing mechanism in chronic pain patients and those at risk for chronicity, thus leading to a vicious pain-tension cycle.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 1999 Society for Psychophysiological Research

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)