Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T00:05:34.193Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effect of the irrelevant location of the response signal on choice reaction time: An electromyographic study in humans

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 November 2002

THIERRY HASBROUCQ
Affiliation:
Centre de Recherche en Neurosciences Cognitives, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Marseille, France
CAMILLE-AIMÉ POSSAMAÏ
Affiliation:
Centre de Recherche en Neurosciences Cognitives, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Marseille, France
MICHEL BONNET
Affiliation:
Centre de Recherche en Neurosciences Cognitives, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Marseille, France
FRANCK VIDAL
Affiliation:
Centre de Recherche en Neurosciences Cognitives, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Marseille, France Institut de Médecine Navale du Service de Santé des Armées, Hôpital Sainte Anne, Toulon, France
Get access

Abstract

Choice reaction time (RT) is shorter when the stimulus corresponds spatially to the response than when the stimulus does not, even when the stimulus location is irrelevant to the task. We used electromyographic measures to document that this effect is the result of a response conflict. The activity of the prime movers of two alternative responses was recorded during the performance of a visual RT task in which the irrelevant spatial correspondence between the stimuli and the responses was varied. Only the premotor component of RT was affected by the stimulus–response correspondence. Correct trials were distinguished according to whether or not the activation of the prime mover involved in the required response was preceded by an activation of the prime mover involved in the alternative response. Double muscular activation trials were more numerous for noncorresponding than for corresponding stimulus–response associations. Furthermore, these trials yielded longer RTs than the single muscular activation trials.

Type
BRIEF REPORT
Copyright
© 1999 Society for Psychophysiological Research

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)