Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-b6zl4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-08T11:55:43.818Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Remarks about a Paired Comparison Model

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2025

Gottfried E. Noether
Gottfried E. Noether*
Affiliation:
Boston University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A generalization of the customary model underlying the Law of Comparative Judgment is established. Methods for estimating location parameters and testing a certain hypothesis are discussed. The problem of the influence of the shape of the curve used to grade responses is raised and a possible approach to its solution is indicated. Two examples are provided.

Type
Original Paper
Information
Psychometrika , Volume 25 , Issue 4 , December 1960 , pp. 357 - 367
Copyright
Copyright © 1960 The Psychometric Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

The author is obliged to F. Mosteller for helpful discussions.

References

Benard, A. and van Elteren, Ph. A generalization of the method ofm rankings. Indagationes Mathematicae, 1953, 15, 358–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bradley, R. A. and Terry, M. E. The rank analysis of incomplete block designs, I.. Biometrika, 1952, 39, 324–345.Google Scholar
Durbin, J. Incomplete blocks in ranking experiments. Brit. J. Psychol., 1951, 4, 85–90.Google Scholar
van Elteren, Ph. and Noether, G. E. The asymptotic efficiency of thexr 2-test for a balanced incomplete block design. Biometrika, 1959, 46, 475–477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mosteller, F. Remarks on the method of paired comparisons, I. Psychometrika, 1951, 16, 3–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mosteller, F. The mystery of the missing corpus. Psychometrika, 1958, 23, 279–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar