Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-cphqk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-07T09:55:24.504Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

In Spite of Indeterminacy Many Common Factor Score Estimates Yield an Identical Reproduced Covariance Matrix

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2025

André Beauducel*
Affiliation:
Helmut-Schmidt University, Educational Department
*
Requests for reprints should be sent to André Beauducel, Helmut-Schmidt University, Educational Department, Postbox 700822, 22008 Hamburg, Germany. E-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

It was investigated whether commonly used factor score estimates lead to the same reproduced covariance matrix of observed variables. This was achieved by means of Schönemann and Steiger’s (1976) regression component analysis, since it is possible to compute the reproduced covariance matrices of the regression components corresponding to different factor score estimates. It was shown that Thurstone’s, Ledermann’s, Bartlett’s, Anderson-Rubin’s, McDonald’s, Krijnen, Wansbeek, and Ten Berge’s, as well as Takeuchi, Yanai, and Mukherjee’s score estimates reproduce the same covariance matrix. In contrast, Harman’s ideal variables score estimates lead to a different reproduced covariance matrix.

Type
Original Paper
Copyright
Copyright © 2007 The Psychometric Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, T.W., & Rubin, H. (1956). Statistical inference in factor analysis. Proceedings of the Third Berkeley Symposium of Mathematical Statistics and Probability, 5, 111150.Google Scholar
Bartlett, M.S. (1937). The statistical conception of mental factors. British Journal of Psychology, 28, 97104.Google Scholar
Fava, J.L., Velicer, W.F. (1992). An empirical comparison of factor, image, component, and scale scores. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 27, 301322.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gorsuch, R.L. (1983). Factor Analysis (2nd ed.),, Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Grice, J.W. (2001). Computing and evaluation factor scores. Psychological Methods, 6, 430450.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grice, J.W., Harris, R.J. (1998). A comparison of regression and loading weights for the computation of factor scores. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 33, 221247.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harman, H.H. (1941). On the rectilinear prediction of oblique factors. Psychometrika, 6, 2935.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harman, H.H. (1976). Modern Factor Analysis (3rd ed.),, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Jöreskog, K.G. (1969). A general approach to confirmatory maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika, 34, 183202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krijnen, W.P., Wansbeek, T.J., Ten Berge, J.M.F. (1996). Best linear predictors for factor scores. Communications in Statistics: Theory and Methods, 25, 30133025.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ledermann, W. (1939). On a shortened method of estimation of mental factors by regression. Psychometrika, 4, 109116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDonald, R.P. (1981). Constrained least squares estimators of oblique common factors. Psychometrika, 46, 337341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mulaik, S.A. (1972). The Foundations of Factor Analysis, New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Schönemann, P.H., Steiger, J.H. (1976). Regression component analysis. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 29, 175189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Takeuchi, K., Yanai, H., Mukherjee, B.N. (1982). The Foundations of Multivariate Analysis, New Dehli: Wiley Eastern.Google Scholar
Ten Berge, J.M.F., Krijnen, W.P., Wansbeek, T., Shapiro, A. (1999). Some new results on correlation-preserving factor scores prediction methods. Linear Algebra and its Applications, 289, 311318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thurstone, L.L. (1935). The Vectors of Mind, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar