Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-l4dxg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-07T18:22:55.380Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Distance-Based Variety of Nonlinear Multivariate Data Analysis, Including Weights for Objects and Variables

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2025

Jacques J. F. Commandeur ,
Patrick J. F. Groenen  and
Jacqueline J. Meulman
Jacques J. F. Commandeur*
Affiliation:
Data Theory Group, Department of Education, Faculty of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Leiden University
Patrick J. F. Groenen
Affiliation:
Data Theory Group, Department of Education, Faculty of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Leiden University
Jacqueline J. Meulman
Affiliation:
Data Theory Group, Department of Education, Faculty of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Leiden University
*
Requests for reprints should be sent to Jacques J.F. Commandeur, Data Theory Group, Department of Education, Faculty of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Leiden University, P.O. Box 9555, 2300 RB Leiden, THE NETHERLANDS.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In the distance approach to nonlinear multivariate data analysis the focus is on the optimal representation of the relationships between the objects in the analysis. In this paper two methods are presented for including weights in distance-based nonlinear multivariate data analysis. In the first method, weights are assigned to the objects while the second method is concerned with differential weighting of groups of variables. When each analysis variable defines a group the latter method becomes a variable weighting method. For objects the weights are assumed to be given; for groups of variables they may be given, or estimated. These weighting schemes can also be combined and have several important applications. For example, they make it possible to perform efficient analyses of large data sets, to use the distance-based variety of nonlinear multivariate data analysis as an addition to loglinear analysis of multiway contingency tables, and to do stability studies of the solutions by applying the bootstrap on the objects or the variables in the analysis. These and other applications are discussed, and an efficient algorithm is proposed to minimize the corresponding loss function.

Keywords

object weightsgroup weightsoptimal scalingmultivariate data analysismultidimensional scalingdistance approachpreference databootstrap
Type
Original Paper
Information
Psychometrika , Volume 64 , Issue 2 , June 1999 , pp. 169 - 186
Copyright
Copyright © 1999 The Psychometric Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

This study is funded by The Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO) by grant nr. 030-56403 for the “PIONEER” project “Subject Oriented Multivariate Analysis” to the third author.

References

Bull, S. (1994). Analysis of attitudes toward workplace smoking restrictions. In Lange, N., Ryan, L., Billard, L., Brillinger, D., Conquest, L., & Greenhouse, J. (Eds.), Case studies in biometry (pp. 249–271). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Carroll, J.D. (1972). Individual differences and multidimensional scaling. In Shepard, R.N., Romney, A.K., & Nerlove, S.B. (Eds.), Multidimensional scaling: Theory and applications in the behavioral sciences (pp. 105–155). New York and London: Seminar Press.Google Scholar
de Leeuw, J. (1988). Convergence of the majorization method for multidimensional scaling. Journal of Classification, 5, 163–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Leeuw, J., & Heiser, W.J. (1980). Multidimensional scaling with restrictions on the configuration. In Krishnaiah, P.R. (Eds.), Multivariate analysis, Vol. V (pp. 501–522). Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
de Leeuw, J., & Meulman, J.J. (1985). Alternative approximations in principal components analysis, Leiden: Leiden University, Department of Data Theory.Google Scholar
Efron, B. (1979). Bootstrap methods: Another look at the jackknife. Annals of Statistics, 7, 172–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Efron, B., & Tibshirani, R.J. (1993). An introduction to the bootstrap, New York: Chapman & Hall.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fienberg, S.E. (1985). The analysis of cross-classified categorical data 2nd ed.,, Cambridge: M.I.T. Press.Google Scholar
Gifi, A. (1990). Nonlinear multivariate analysis, Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
Groenen, P.J.F., Commandeur, J.J.F., & Meulman, J.J. (1998). Distance analysis of large data sets of categorical variables using object weights. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 51, 217–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hillebrand, R., Meulman, J. J. (1992). Afstand en nabijheid: verhoudingen in de Tweede Kamer. In Thomassen, J.J.A., van Schendelen, M.P.C.M., & Zielonka-Goei, M.L. (Eds.), De geachte afgevaardigde...hoe kamerleden denken over het Nederlandse parlement, Muiderberg: Coutinho. [Distance and nearness: Relations in the Second Chamber]Google Scholar
Kruskal, J.B. (1964). Multidimensional scaling by optimizing goodness of fit to a nonmetric hypothesis. Psychometrika, 29, 1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kruskal, J.B. (1964). Nonmetric multidimensional scaling: A numerical method. Psychometrika, 29, 115–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Max, J. (1960). Quantizing for minimum distortion. Proceedings IEEE, Information theory, 6, 7–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meulman, J.J. (1986). A distance approach to nonlinear multivariate analysis, Leiden: DSWO Press.Google Scholar
Meulman, J.J. (1992). The integration of multidimensional scaling and multivariate analysis with optimal transformations. Psychometrika, 57, 539–565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meulman, J.J. (1993). Points of view analysis revisited: Fitting multidimensional structures to optimal distance components with cluster restrictions on the variables. Psychometrika, 58, 7–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meulman, J.J., & Heiser, W.J. (1983). The display of bootstrap solutions in multidimensional scaling. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
Sewell, W.H., & Shah, V.P. (1968). Social class, parental encouragement, and educational aspirations. American Journal of Sociology, 73, 559–572.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tucker, L.R. (1960). Intra-individual and inter-individual multidimensionality. In Gulliksen, H., & Messick, S. (Eds.), Psychological scaling: Theory and applications (pp. 155–167). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar