Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-d8cs5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-08T11:53:42.097Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Descriptive Social Norms as Underappreciated Sources of Social Control

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2025

Robert B. Cialdini
Robert B. Cialdini*
Affiliation:
Arizona State University
*
Requests for reprints should be sent to Robert B. Cialdini, Department of Psychology, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287-1104, USA. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Böckenholt and van der Heijden’s results regarding compliance with insurance regulations—that the enforcement activities of a regulatory agency were relatively unpredictive of compliance—are consistent with findings from other domains (e.g., tax adherence), where personal factors and informal social controls have been shown to play a more significant role. However, the specific form of informal social control investigated in Böckenholt and van der Heijden’s study (the perceived approval/disapproval of friends and family) is not the only kind of informal social control that has proven effective in spurring compliance. Descriptive social norms, which involve perceptions not of what others approve but of what others actually do, also influence compliance decisions powerfully. Yet, the role of descriptive social norms in rule adherence is often underappreciated by governed and governors alike. The consequences of this relative lack of recognition are discussed within the arena of compliance with pro-environmental regulations and requests.

Keywords

social normssocial controlnoncompliance
Type
Original Paper
Information
Psychometrika , Volume 72 , Issue 2 , June 2007 , pp. 263 - 268
Copyright
Copyright © 2007 The Psychometric Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Brehm, S.S., Brehm, J.W. (1981). Psychological reactance, New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Bryan, J.H., Test, M.A. (1967). Models and helping: Naturalistic studies in aiding behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 6, 400–407.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Burgoon, M., Alvaro, E., Grandpre, J., & Voulodakis, M. (2002). Revisiting the theory of psychological reactance. In Dillard, J. P., & Pfau, M. (Eds.), The persuasion handbook (pp. 195–211). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Cialdini, R.B. (2001). Influence: Science and practice (4th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
Cialdini, R.B. (2003). Crafting normative messages to protect the environment. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 12, 105–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cialdini, R.B., Reno, R.R., Kallgren, C.A. (1990). A focus theory of normative conduct: Recycling the concept of norms to reduce littering in public places. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 1015–1026.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Festinger, L. (1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations, 7, 117–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldstein, N., Cialdini, R.B., & Griskevicius, V. (submitted). A room with a viewpoint: Using norm-based appeals to motivate conservation behaviors in a hotel setting.Google Scholar
Kahan, D. (1997). Social influence, social meaning, and deterrence. Virginia Law Review, 83, 349–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larimer, M.E., Neigbors, C. (2003). Normative misperception and the impact of descriptive and injunctive norms on college student gambling. Psychology of Addictive Behavior, 17, 235–243.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Le Bon, G. (1895/1960). Psychologie des foules (Psychology of the crowd). New York: Viking Press.Google Scholar
MacKay, C. (1841/1932). Popular delusions and the madness of crowds. New York: Farrar, Straus, and Giroux.Google Scholar
Milgram, S., Bickman, L., Berkowitz, L. (1969). Note on the drawing power of crowds of different size. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 13, 79–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nisbett, R.E., Wilson, T.D. (1977). Telling more than we can know: Verbal report on mental processes. Psychological Review, 84, 231–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roth, J.A., & Scholz, J.T. (Eds.) (1989). Taxpayer compliance: Social science perspectives. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Schultz, P.W., Nolan, J.M., Cialdini, R.B., Goldstein, N., & Griskevicius, V. (in press). The constructive, destructive, and reconstructive power of social norms. Psychological Science..Google Scholar
Van Empelen, P., Schaalma, H.P., Kok, G., Jansen, M.R.J. (2001). Predicting condom use with casual and steady partners among drug users. Health Education Research: Theory and Practice, 16, 293–305.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed