Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-hvd4g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-11T09:31:46.678Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Analysis of Proximities: Multidimensional Scaling with an Unknown Distance Function. I.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2025

Roger N. Shepard
Roger N. Shepard*
Affiliation:
Bell Telephone Laboratories
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A computer program is described that is designed to reconstruct the metric configuration of a set of points in Euclidean space on the basis of essentially nonmetric information about that configuration. A minimum set of Cartesian coordinates for the points is determined when the only available information specifies for each pair of those points—not the distance between them—but some unknown, fixed monotonic function of that distance. The program is proposed as a tool for reductively analyzing several types of psychological data, particularly measures of interstimulus similarity or confusability, by making explicit the multidimensional structure underlying such data.

Type
Original Paper
Information
Psychometrika , Volume 27 , Issue 2 , June 1962 , pp. 125 - 140
Copyright
Copyright © 1962 The Psychometric Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abelson, R. P. and Sermat, V. Multidimensional scaling of facial expressions. J. exp. Psychol, in press.Google Scholar
Attneave, F. Dimensions of similarity. Amer. J. Psychol, 1950, 63, 516–556.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bales, R. F., Strodtbeck, F. L., Mills, T. M., and Roseborough, M. E. Channels of communication in small groups. Amer. sociol. Rev., 1951, 16, 461–468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bennett, J. F. and Hays, W. L. Multidimensional unfolding: Determining the dimensionality of ranked preference data. Psychometrika, 1960, 25, 27–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coxeter, H. S. M. Regular polytopes, London: Methuen, 1948.Google Scholar
Ekman, G. Dimensions of color vision. J. Psychol., 1954, 38, 467–474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, B. F. and Anderson, L. K. The tactual identification of shapes for coding switch handles. J. appl. Psychol., 1955, 39, 219–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hammersley, J. M. The distribution of distances in a hypersphere. Ann. math. Statist., 1950, 21, 447–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harman, H. H. Modern factor analysis, Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press, 1960.Google Scholar
Keller, F. S. and Taubman, R. E. Studies in international morse code. II. Errors made in code reception. J. appl. Psychol., 1943, 27, 504–509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lord, R. D. The distribution of distance in a hypersphere. Ann. math. Statist., 1954, 25, 794–798.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plotkin, L. Stimulus generalization in morse code learning. Arch. Psychol., 1943, 40, 287.Google Scholar
Rothkopf, E. Z. Signal similarity and reception errors in early morse code training. In Finch, G. and Cameron, F. (Eds.), Symposium on Air Force human engineering, personnel, and training research. Washington: National Academy of Sciences—National Research Council Publication 455, 1956. Pp. 229–235..Google Scholar
Rothkopf, E. Z. A measure of stimulus similarity and errors in some paired-associate learning tasks. J. exp. Psychol., 1957, 53, 94–101.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Seashore, H. and Kurtz, A. K. Analysis of errors in copying code. Washington, D. C.: Office of Scientific Research and Development, Rep. No. 4010, 1944.Google Scholar
Shepard, R. N. Multidimensional scaling of concepts based upon sequences of restricted associative responses. Amer. Psychologist, 1957, 12, 440–441. (Abstract).Google Scholar
Shepard, R. N. Stimulus and response generalization: A stochastic model relating generalization to distance in psychological space. Psychometrika, 1957, 22, 325–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shepard, R. N. Stimulus and response generalization: Tests of a model relating generalization to distance in psychological space. J. exp. Psychol., 1958, 55, 509–523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shepard, R. N. Stimulus and response generalization: Deduction of the generalization gradient from a trace model. Psychol. Rev., 1958, 65, 242–256.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shepard, R. N. Similarity of stimuli and metric properties of behavioral data. In Gulliksen, H. and Messick, S. (Eds.), Psychological scaling: theory and method. New York: Wiley, 1960, 33–43..Google Scholar
Torgerson, W. S. Theory and methods of scaling, New York: Wiley, 1958.Google Scholar