Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T20:45:03.410Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A randomized trial comparing repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation given 3 days/week and 5 days/week for the treatment of major depression: is efficacy related to the duration of treatment or the number of treatments?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 September 2011

C. Galletly ,
S. Gill ,
P. Clarke ,
C. Burton  and
P. B. Fitzgerald
C. Galletly*
Affiliation:
The Adelaide Clinic, Ramsay Health Care (SA) Mental Health Services, South Australia Discipline of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, The University of Adelaide, South Australia Northern Mental Health, Adelaide Health Service, South Australia
S. Gill
Affiliation:
The Adelaide Clinic, Ramsay Health Care (SA) Mental Health Services, South Australia
P. Clarke
Affiliation:
The Adelaide Clinic, Ramsay Health Care (SA) Mental Health Services, South Australia
C. Burton
Affiliation:
The Adelaide Clinic, Ramsay Health Care (SA) Mental Health Services, South Australia
P. B. Fitzgerald
Affiliation:
Monash Alfred Psychiatry Research Centre, The Alfred and Monash University School of Psychology and Psychiatry, Victoria, Australia
*
*Address for correspondence: Professor C. Galletly, Suite 13, The Adelaide Clinic Consulting Suites, 33 Park Tce, Gilberton 5081, Australia. (Email: [email protected])
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Background

Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) has been shown to be an effective treatment for depression. However, there has been little research to determine optimal parameters for treatment.

Method

This study compared two rTMS treatment regimes for the treatment of major depression. Seventy-seven participants were randomized to either spaced or daily treatment. Spaced rTMS was given 3 days/week for 6 weeks (18 treatments in total) and daily rTMS was given 5 days/week for 4 weeks (20 treatments in total). All participants were assessed at baseline and after 4 weeks of treatment. Participants in the spaced treatment group were also assessed after 6 weeks of treatment. All participants were treated at 110% of the resting motor threshold with high-frequency rTMS (10 Hz) to the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) followed by low-frequency rTMS to the right DLPFC.

Results

Participants in the daily treatment group showed more improvement by week 4 than those in the spaced treatment group; however, both groups had similar improvement by treatment completion. There was significant improvement in both groups in ratings of depression and anxiety, with no significant differences between groups.

Conclusions

Our study indicates that the efficacy of rTMS is related to the number of treatments given and that spacing the treatments neither improves nor reduces efficacy.

Keywords

Antidepressantdorsolateral prefrontal cortexhigh-frequency stimulationneurostimulationtreatment service
Type
Original Articles
Information
Psychological Medicine , Volume 42 , Issue 5 , May 2012 , pp. 981 - 988
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bäumer, T, Lange, R, Liepert, J, Weiller, C, Siebner, HR, Rothwell, JC, Münchau, A (2003). Repeated premotor rTMS leads to cumulative plastic changes of motor cortex excitability in humans. NeuroImage 20, 550–560.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Charlson, F, Siskind, D, Doi, SAR, McCallum, E, Broome, A, Lie, DC (2011). ECT efficacy and treatment course: a systematic review and meta-analysis of twice vs thrice weekly schedules. Journal of Affective Disorders. Published online: 17 April 2011. doi:10.1016/j.jad.2011.03.039.Google ScholarPubMed
Chen, F, Madsen, TM, Wegener, G, Nyengaard, JR (2009). Repeated electroconvulsive seizures increase the total number of synapses in adult male rat hippocampus. European Neuropsychopharmacology 19, 329–338.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cohen, RB, Boggio, PS, Fregni, F (2009). Risk factors for relapse after remission with repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for the treatment of depression. Depression and Anxiety 26, 682–688.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fava, M (2000). Management of nonresponse and intolerance: switching strategies. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry 61 (Suppl. 2), 10–12.Google ScholarPubMed
FDA (2008). Neuronetics (510k) Summary. NeuroStar TMS Therapy System. Food and Drug Administration: Rockville, MD (www.accessdata.fda.gov/cdrh_docs/pdf8/K083538.pdf). Accessed 17 March 2011.Google Scholar
Fitzgerald, PB, Benitez, J, de Castella, A, Daskalakis, ZJ, Brown, TL, Kulkarni, J (2006). A randomized, controlled trial of sequential bilateral repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for treatment-resistant depression. American Journal of Psychiatry 163, 88–94.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fitzgerald, PB, Hoy, K, Gunewardene, R, Slack, C, Ibrahim, S, Bailey, M, Daskalakis, ZJ (2010). A randomized trial of unilateral and bilateral prefrontal cortex transcranial magnetic stimulation in treatment-resistant major depression. Psychological Medicine. Published online: 7 October 2010. doi:10.1017/S0033291710001923.Google ScholarPubMed
Frank, E, Eichhammer, P, Burger, J, Zowe, M, Landgrebe, M, Hajak, G, Langguth, B (2011). Transcranial magnetic stimulation for the treatment of depression: feasibility and results under naturalistic conditions: a retrospective analysis. European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience 261, 261–266.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gaynes, BN, Warden, D, Trivedi, MH, Wisniewski, SR, Fava, M, Rush, AJ (2009). What did STAR*D teach us? Results from a large-scale, practical, clinical trial for patients with depression. Psychiatric Services 60, 1439–1445.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
George, MS, Lisanby, SH, Avery, D, McDonald, WM, Durkalski, V, Pavlicova, M, Anderson, B, Nahas, Z, Bulow, P, Zarkowski, P, Holtzheimer, PE, Schwartz, T, Sackeim, (2010). Daily left prefrontal transcranial magnetic stimulation therapy for major depressive disorder: a sham-controlled randomized trial. Archives of General Psychiatry 67, 507–516.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Guse, B, Falkai, P, Wobrock, T (2010). Cognitive effects of high-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation: a systematic review. Journal of Neural Transmission 117, 105–122.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hamilton, M (1959). The assessment of anxiety states by rating. British Journal of Medical Psychology 32, 50–55.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hedlund, JL, Vieweg, BW (1979). The Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression: a comprehensive review. Journal of Operational Psychiatry 10, 149–165.Google Scholar
Kendell, RE (1981). The present status of electroconvulsive therapy. British Journal of Psychiatry 139, 265–283.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lisanby, SH, Belmaker, RH (2000). Animal models of the mechanisms of action of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (RTMS): comparisons with electroconvulsive shock (ECS). Depression and Anxiety 12, 178–187.3.0.CO;2-N>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Martin, OLR, Barbanoj, MJ, Schlaepfer, TE, Thompson, E, Pérez, V, Kulisevsky, J (2003). Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for the treatment of depression: systematic review and meta-analysis. British Journal of Psychiatry 182, 480–491.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Montgomery, SA, Åsberg, M (1979). A new depression scale designed to be sensitive to change. British Journal of Psychiatry 134, 382–389.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
O'Reardon, JP, Solvason, HB, Janicak, PG, Sampson, S, Isenberg, KE, Nahas, Z, McDonald, WM, Avery, D, Fitzgerald, PB, Loo, C, Demitrack, MA, George, MS, Sackeim, HA (2007). Efficacy and safety of transcranial magnetic stimulation in the acute treatment of major depression: a multisite randomized controlled trial. Biological Psychiatry 62, 1208–1216.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pridmore, S, Fernandes Filho, JA, Naha, Z, Liberatos, C, George, MS (1998). Motor threshold in transcranial magnetic stimulation: a comparison of a neurophysiological method and a visualisation method. Journal of ECT 14, 25–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ray, S, Nizamie, SH, Akhtar, S, Praharaj, SK, Mishra, BR, Zia-Ul-Haq, M (2011). Efficacy of adjunctive high frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of left prefrontal cortex in depression: a randomized sham controlled study. Journal of Affective Disorders 128, 153–159.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rush, AJ, Fava, M, Wisniewski, SR, Lavori, PW, Trivedi, MH, Sackeim, HA, Thase, ME, Nierenberg, AA, Quitkin, FM, Kashner, TM, Kupfer, DJ, Rosenbaum, JF, Alpert, J, Stewart, JW, McGrath, PJ, Biggs, MM, Shores-Wilson, K, Lebowitz, BD, Ritz, L, Niederehe, G (2004). Sequenced treatment alternatives to relieve depression (STAR*D): rationale and design. Controlled Clinical Trials 25, 119–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rush, AJ, Warden, D, Wisniewski, SR, Fava, M, Trivedi, MH, Gaynes, BN, Nierenberg, AA (2009). STAR*D: revising conventional wisdom. CNS Drugs 23, 627–647.Google Scholar
Schutter, DJLG (2009). Antidepressant efficacy of high-frequency transcranial magnetic stimulation over the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in double-blind sham-controlled designs: a meta-analysis. Psychological Medicine 39, 65–75.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shapira, B, Calev, A, Lerer, B (1991). Optimal use of electroconvulsive therapy: choosing a treatment schedule. Psychiatric Clinics of North America 14, 935–946.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sheehan, DV, Lecrubier, Y, Sheehan, KH, Amorim, P, Janavs, J, Weiller, E, Hergueta, T, Baker, R, Dunbar, GC (1998). The Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (M.I.N.I.): the development and validation of a structured diagnostic psychiatric interview for DSM-IV and ICD-10. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry 59 (Suppl. 20), 22–33.Google ScholarPubMed
Slotema, CW, Blom, JD, Hoek, HW, Sommer, IE (2010). Should we expand the toolbox of psychiatric treatment methods to include repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS)? A meta-analysis of the efficacy of rTMS in psychiatric disorders. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry 71, 873–884.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Turnier-Shea, Y, Bruno, R, Pridmore, S (2006). Daily and spaced treatment with transcranial magnetic stimulation in major depression: a pilot study. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry 40, 759–763.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ueyama, E, Ukai, S, Ogawa, A, Yamamoto, M, Kawaguchi, S, Ishii, R, Shinosaki, K (2011). Chronic repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation increases hippocampal neurogenesis in rats. Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience 65, 77–81.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
WHO (2004). The Global Burden of Disease: 2004 Update. WHO Press, World Health Organization: Geneva (www.who.int/healthinfo/global_burden_disease/GBD_report_2004update_full.pdf). Accessed 17 March 2011.Google Scholar
Zung, W (1965). A self-rating depression scale. Archives of General Psychiatry 12, 63–70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed