Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T23:47:27.688Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Neuropsychologie de L’anxiété: une Ouverture

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 April 2020

M. de Bonis*
Affiliation:
CNRS, Faculté de Médecine Paris-Sud, 94276 Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France
Get access

Résumé

On se propose de montrer comment l’émergence d’un nouveau paradigme en psychologie – la psychologie cognitive, son extension à l’étude de l’anxiété – offre par rapport à deux modéles dominants – la théorie de l’apprentissage et la psychanalyse – une troisième voie de recherche. Parmi les acceptions du terme «cognitif», c’est l’idée d’une organisation des niveaux expressifs qui est retenue. Partant d’une définition de l’anxiété en termes de conséquence comportementale d’un faisceau d’interactions, on montre à l’appui de méthodes neuropsychologiques élargies: – l’existence de dissociations entre niveaux expressifs en insistant sur le degré de liberté et l’hétérogénéité de fonctionnement qui en découlent; – l’existence de formes d’indépendance ou d’interdépendance entre niveaux expressifs, en évoquant les controverses sur le caractére automatique ou volontaire des liaisons entre expressions faciales et les autres niveaux expressifs, verbaux et psychophysiologiques; – le rôle privilégié du langage en tant que fonction intégratrice des autres niveaux expressifs. En conclusion, on souligne que la spécificité de l’anxiété au sein du systèmé général des émotions consiste essentiellement dans son caractère non modulaire.

Summary

Summary

The emergence of a new paradigm, cognitive psychology, seems to offer as compared with the two prevailing psychological models, learning theory and psychoanalysis, a third means of studying anxiety states. Among the different meanings of the word «cognitive», the idea of an organization of expressive levels is underlined, with anxiety defined in terms of the behavioral consequence of a cluster of interactions. The three following properties are emphasized within a broad neuropsychological approach: dissociations between expressive levels leading to a greater level of freedom and a functional heterogeneity; diversity of the forms of relationships between the expressive levels (front independency to interdependency), taking into consideration the controversy regarding the automatic or voluntary control between facial expressions and other expressive levels, verbal and psychophysiological; prevailing role of language as an integrator of the other expressive levels.

In conclusion, it is suggested that the specificity of anxiety within the general system of emotions consists in its property of non modularity.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © European Psychiatric Association 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Références

Bonis, M. de (1977) Assessing interactions between trait anxiety and stressful situations with special emphasis on the coherence of response modes. In: Personality at the Crossroads (Magnusson, D. & Endler, N.S., eds.). Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, pp. 207-211Google Scholar
Bonis, M. de (1977) Stress, facteurs cognitifs et indices physiologiques. Psychol. Med. 9, 14331442Google Scholar
Bonis, M. de (1986) L’idée d’interaction entre niveaux expressifs: émotions, représentations et cognition. Bull. Psychol. 39, 913921Google Scholar
Bonis, M. de (1987) Modéles psychologiques de l’anxiété chez l’homme. Implications en psychiatrie. In: L ‘Anxiété (Pichot, P., éd.). Masson, ParisGoogle Scholar
Bonis, M. de & Freixa, IBaqué, E. (1978) Diphasic electrodermal response, heart rate and moods. Biol. Psychol. 6, 7791CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bruyer, R. (1983) Le, Visage et l ‘Expression Faciale. Approche Neuropsychologique. Mardaga, BruxellesGoogle Scholar
Chavoix, C.Dési, M. & Bonis, M. de (1987) Relationships between mood State and information Processing of negative versus positive emotional stimuli in brain damaged patients. Psychopathology 20, 3441Google Scholar
Eckman, P. (1985) Telling Lies. Norton, New YorkGoogle Scholar
Eckman, P.Levenson, R.W. & Freisen, W.V. (1983) Autonomic nervous System activity did distinguishe among emotions. Science 221, 12081209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fodor, J.A. (1985) Precis of “the modularity of mind ”, Behav. Brain Sci. 8, 142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
lzard, L.Kagan, J. & Zajonc, R.B. (1984) Affect and Cognition. Plenum Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
Klein, D.F. (1980) Anxiety reconceptualized. Compr. Psychiatry 21, 411427CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kœnisberg, H.W. & Handley, R. (1986) Expressed emotion: front predictive index to clinical construction. Am. J. Psychiatry 143, 13611373Google Scholar
Kuipers, L. (1979) Expressed emotions: a review. Br. Soc. Clin. Psychol. 18, 237243CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lane, R.D. & Schwartz, G.E. (1987) Levels of awareness: a cognitive-developmental theory and its application to psychology. Am. J. Psychiatry 144, 133143Google Scholar
Murray, D.C. (1971) Talk, silence and anxiety. Psychol. Bull. 75, 244260CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Naveteur, J. & Freixa, IBaqué, E. (1988) Individual differences in electrodermal activity as a function of subject anxiety. In: Personality and Individual Differences (sous presse)Google Scholar
Reuchlin, M. (1978) Un essai d’analyse de la distinction «psychologie de laboratoire, psychologie de terrain». Trav. Hum. 41, 319325Google Scholar
McReynolds, P. (1968) Advances in Psychological Assessment. Service and Behavior Book, Palo Alto, p. 336Google Scholar
Spence, D.P. (1987) Lexical leakage. In : Applied Psycholinguistics and Mental Health (Rieber, R.W., ed.). Plenum Press, New York, pp. 139-175Google Scholar
Tucker, D.M.Antes, J.R.Stanslie, C.E. & Barnhardt, T.N. (1978) Anxiety and lateral cerebral function. J. Abnorm. Psychol. 87, 380383CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zajonc, R. (1984) On the primacy of affect. Am. Psychol. 39, 117123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.