Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T19:35:08.031Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Use of rating scales by consultant psychiatrists

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

Karl Rice  and
Peter Donnelly
Karl Rice
Affiliation:
Cefn Coed Hospital, Swansea SA2 0GH
Peter Donnelly
Affiliation:
St David's Hospital, Carmarthen
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The number and diversity of rating scales and tests of psychiatric status has increased dramatically in the last 20 to 30 years. Tests are in screening, e.g. for dementia the Mini Mental State Examination and the Abbreviated Mental Test; to aid clarification of the diagnosis in difficult cases, e.g. Walton-Black New Word Learning Test, to differentiate between depression and dementia; and in assessing severity of symptoms, e.g. Hamilton Depression Rating Scale.

Type
Original articles
Information
Psychiatric Bulletin , Volume 16 , Issue 6 , June 1992 , pp. 329 - 330
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1992

References

Kupfer, D. J. & Rush, A. J. (1983) Recommendations for depression publications. British Journal of Psychiatry, 143, 638–639.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.