Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T03:33:38.160Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Should psychiatrists support CPA, guidelines and routine outcome measurement?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

Paul Lelliott
Paul Lelliott*
Affiliation:
Royal College of Psychiatrists' Research Unit 11 Grosvenor Crescent, London SW1X 7EE Lelliott
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Editorials
Information
Psychiatric Bulletin , Volume 21 , Issue 1 , January 1997 , pp. 1 - 2
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © 1997 The Royal College of Psychiatrists

References

Dickinson, M. J. (1996) HoNOS, CPA, CPGs & Co. Psychiatric Bulletin, 20, 119.Google Scholar
Grimshaw, J. M. & Russell, I. T. (1993) Effect of clinical guidelines on medical practice: a systematic review of rigorous evaluations. Lancet 342, 1317–1322.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.