Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-01T00:20:15.648Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The pattern of delays in Mental Health Review Tribunals

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

Stephen Blumenthal
Affiliation:
Department of Psychological Medicine, King's College Hospital, Denmark Hill, London SE5 9RS
Simon Wessely
Affiliation:
Department of Psychological Medicine, King's College Hospital, Denmark Hill, London SE5 9RS
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Mental Health Review Tribunals (MHRTs) are intended to protect the liberty of the detained patient. In practice, however, they have been said to fall short of providing this safeguard. This is frequently for administrative reasons. We report a systematic examination of the pattern of delays in holding MHRTs. Our main finding is that delay cannot be attributed to a single factor but rather reflects the inherent complexity of some cases.

Type
Original papers
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1994

References

Council on Tribunals (1992) Annual Report. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
Department of Health (1993) Unpublished statistics.Google Scholar
Genn, H. & Genn, Y. (1989) The Effectiveness of Representation at Tribunals. Unpublished report to the Lord Chancellor's Department.Google Scholar
Pudlo, P. (1987) Mental Health Review Tribunal Delays. Unpublished Department of Health Report.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.