Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T22:32:50.035Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Audit of a recently introduced stimulus dosing policy in an electroconvulsive therapy clinic

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

G. Shaikh ,
R. Ireland ,
M. McBreen  and
R. Ramana
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Aims and method

To audit the clinical practice of seizure threshold estimation and subsequent stimulus dose adjustment in the electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) clinic. Case notes of patients who had ECT over a six-month period were audited. Results were discussed at an audit meeting and guidelines and training modified appropriately prior to the second cycle of the audit.

Results

Initial dose titration was poor in the first period, but improved in the second. The majority of patients were insufficiently stimulated after missed seizures in both periods and stimulus doses were not being reduced following prolonged seizures.

Clinical implications

The audit identified the need for continuing supervision of trainees in addition to clear training and guidelines.

Type
Original Papers
Information
Psychiatric Bulletin , Volume 23 , Issue 9: The Journal of Trends in Psychiatric Practice , September 1999 , pp. 541 - 543
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © 1999 The Royal College of Psychiatrists

References

Ottoson, J. O. (1960) Experimental studies of the mode of electroconvulsive therapy. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 35 (suppl. 145), 1 141.Google Scholar
Pippard, J. (1992) Audit of electroconvulsive treatment in two National Health Service regions. British Journal of Psychiatry, 160, 621 637.Google Scholar
Royal College of Psychiatrists (1995) The ECT Handbook . The Second Report of the Royal College of Psychiatrists, Special Committee on ECT. Council Report CR39. (ed. Freeman, C. P.). London: Royal College of Psychiatrists.Google Scholar
Sackeim, H. A., Decina, P., Prohovnik, I., et al (1987) Seizure threshold in electroconvulsive therapy: affects of age, sex, electrode placement and number of treatments. Archives of General Psychiatry, 44, 355 360.Google Scholar
Sackeim, H. A., $ Devanand, D. P. & Prudic, J. (1991) Stimulus intensity, seizure threshold and seizure duration, impact on efficacy and safety of electroconvulsive therapy. Psychiatric Clinics of North America, 14, 803 839.Google Scholar
Sackeim, H. A., Prudic, J., Devanand, D. P., et al (1993) Effects of stimulus intensity and electrode placement on the efficacy and cognitive side-effects of electroconvulsive therapy. New England Journal of Medicine, 328, 839 846.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.