Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-mzp66 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-05T11:12:13.362Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Newton’s Classic Deductions from Phenomena

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2023

William Harpe
William Harpe*
Affiliation:
University of Western Ontario
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

I take Newton’s arguments to inverse square centripetal forces from Kepler’s harmonic and areal laws to be classic deductions from phenomena. I argue that the theorems backing up these inferences establish systematic dependencies that make the phenomena carry the objective information that the propositions inferred from them hold. A review of the data supporting Kepler’s laws indicates that these phenomena are Whewellian colligations—generalizations corresponding to the selection of a best fitting curve for an open-ended body of data. I argue that the information theoretic features of Newton’s corrections of the Keplerian phenomena to account for perturbations introduced by universal gravitation show that these corrections do not undercut the inferences from the Keplerian phenomena. Finally, I suggest that all of Newton’s impressive applications of Universal gravitation to account for motion phenomena show an attempt to deliver explanations that share these salient features of his classic deductions from phenomena.

Type
Part V. Deduction From the Phenomena
Information
PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association , Volume 1990 , Issue 2: Volume Two: Symposia and Invited Papers 1990 , 1990 , pp. 182 - 196
Copyright
Copyright © Philosophy of Science Association 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

1

I want to thank Bryce Bennett, Ram Valluri, Rob DiSalle, Kathleen Okruhlik, John Nicholas and, especially, Curtis Wilson for help, encouragement and advice.

References

Aiton, E.J. (1972) The Vortex Theory of Planetary Motions.. London: Macdonald: New York: American Elsevier.Google Scholar
Butts, R.E. and David, J.W. (eds) (1970) The Methodological Heritage of Newton. Toronto.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caspar, (ed.) Johannes Kepler Gesammelte Werke. (Munich, 1938—).Google Scholar
Cohen, I. B. (1980), The Newtonian Revolution. Cambridge University Press:.Google Scholar
Cohen, I. B. and Whitman, A. (1987) .(Translators) Isaac Newton: Mathematical Principles of Natural Philosophy. Cambridge, Mass. Manuscript to be published by Harvard University Press and Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Danby, J.M.A. (1962), Fundamentals of Celestial Mechanics. Macmillan Press.Google Scholar
Dretske, F. (1980) Knowledge and the Flow of Information. M.I.T. PressGoogle Scholar
Earman, J. (ed.) (1983) Testing Scientific Theories.. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Feyerabend, P.K. (1970) “Classic Empiricism”. In Butts, R.E. and David, J.W. (eds.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gingerich, O. (1989) Johannes Kepler., Chapt.5 in Taton and Wilson (eds.) 1989.Google Scholar
Glymour, C. (1980) Theory and Evidence. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Goldstein, H. Classical Mechanic.. Addison Wesley Publishing Company, 2nd edition, 1981.Google Scholar
Kepler, J. (A.N.) Astronomia No.. Vol.3, in Caspar (ed.)Google Scholar
A., Koyré (1965), Newtonian Studies. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
A., Koyré, and I.B., Cohen, (eds.) (1972) Isaac Newton’s Philosophiae Naturalis Principia Mathematic.. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard Press.Google Scholar
Layman, R. (1983) “Newton’s Demonstration of Universal Gravitation and Philosophical Theories”. In Earman (ed.)Google Scholar
Lewis, D.K. (1980) “Veridical Hallucination and Prosthetic Vision”. Australasian Journal of Philosophy.., 58: 239–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenkrantz, R. (1981) Foundations and Applications of Inductive Probability.., Ridgeview Publishing Company, Atascadero, Calif.Google Scholar
Stalnaker, R. (1984) Inquiry. M.I.T. Press.Google Scholar
Stein, H. (1990) “From the Phenomena of Motions to the Forces of Nature: Hypothesis or Deduction?”. Manuscript (this volume?)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whewell, W. (1858) (NOR) Novum Organon Renovatum.., 3rd edition with additions London: John W. Parker and Son, facsimile reprint by University Microfilms, Ann Arbor, Michigan (1971)Google Scholar
Whiteside, D.T. (1974) “Keplerian Planetary Eggs Laid and Unlaid, 1600-1605”, in Journal for the History of Astronomy., Vol. 1974, pg.1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, C.A. (1974) “Newton and Some Philosophers on Kepler’s Laws”. Journal of the History of Ide.., Vol.35, pp.231–158.Google Scholar
Wilson, C.A. (1989) “;The Newtonian Achievement in Astronomy” Chapt.13 in Taton and Wilson (eds.)Google Scholar
Wilson, C.A. “Horrocks, Harmonies, and the Exactitude of Kepler’s Third Law” in Wilson, Astronomy from Kepler to Newton.., Chap.VI.Google Scholar