Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-grxwn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-27T15:45:01.953Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Dogs that don't hark in the night: How to invesligate the lack of a domain of expertise?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 June 2023

Dorothy L. Cheney  and
Robert M. Seyfarth
Dorothy L. Cheney
Affiliation:
University of Penn
Robert M. Seyfarth
Affiliation:
University of Penn
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Apparently stupid animals often do remarkably intelligent things. Leaf-cutting ants, for example, “plant” leaves in underground farms, where they cultivate particular species of fungus to provision their colony. In so doing, the ants act as if they understand the environrnental conditions that optimize fungus growth. Entomologists studying this behavior, however, are rarely tempted to interpret the ants’ activities as conscious or goal-directed. Instead, they view them as relatively inflexible adaptations to particular selective pressures. Ants are good at cultivating fungus, but this is not taken as proof of any general skills in problem solving or learning.

Type
Part IV: Cognitive Ethology
Information
PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association , Volume 1992 , Issue 2: Volume Two: Symposia and Invited Papers 1992 , 1993 , pp. 92 - 109
Copyright
Copyright © 1993 by the Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abegglen, J. J. (1984), On Socialization in Hamadryas Baboons. Lewisburg, PA: Bucknell University Press.Google Scholar
Astington, J. W., Harris, P. L., and Olson, D. R. (eds.) (1988), Developing Theories of Mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Atran, S. (1990), Cognitive Foundations of Natural History: Toward an Anthropology of Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Balda, R. P. and Kamil, A. C. (1988), “The Spatial Memory of Clark's Nutcrackers (Nucifraga columbiana), in an Analogue of the Radial Arm Maze.” Animal Learning and Behavior 16:116-122.Google Scholar
Balda, R. P., Kamil, A. C., and Grim, K. (1987), “Revisits to Emptied Cache Sites by Nutcrackers.” Animal Behaviour 34:1289-1298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baron-Cohen, S., Leslie, A. M., and Frith, V. (1986), “Mechanistic, Behavioral and Intentional Understanding of Picture Stories in Autistic Children.” British Journal of Developmental Psychology 4: 113-125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boesch, C. (1991), “Teaching in Wild Chimpanzees.” Animal Behaviour 41 :530-532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boesch, C. and Boesch, H. (1983), “Optimisation of Nut-cracking with Natural Hammers by Wild Chimpanzees.” Behaviour 83:265-86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, A. L. (1990), “Domain-specific Principles Affect Learning and Transfer in Children.” Cognitive Science 14:107-133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carey, S. (1985), Conceptual Change in Childhood. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Cheney, D. L. and Seyfarth, R. M. (1985), “Social and Non-social Knowledge in Vervet Monkeys.” in Animal Intelligence, L. Weiskrantz (ed.). Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Cheney, D. L. (1990), How Monkeys See the World: Inside the Mind of Another Species. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheney, D. L., Seyfarth, R.M” Andelman, S. J. and Lee, P. C. (1988), “Reproductive Success in Vervet Monkeys.” in Reproductive Success, T.H. Clutton-Brock (ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1980), Rufesand Representations. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Clutton-Brock, T. H. and Harvey, P. H. (1980), “Primates, Brains and Behaviour.” Journal of the Zoological Society of London 190:309-23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Connor, R. C. Smolker, R. A., and Richards, A. F. (1992), “Two Levels of Alliance Formation among Male Bottlenose Delphins (Tursiops sp.).” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 89:987-990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cosmides, L. (1989), “The Logic of Social Exchange: Has Natural Selection Shaped How Humans Reason?” Cognition 31:187-276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
D'Amato, M. R. and Salmen, D. P. (1982), “Tune Discrimination in Monkeys (Cebus apella), andin Rats.” Animal Learning and Behavior 10:126-134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
D'Amato, M. R. (1984), “Cognitive Processes in Cebus Monkeys.” in Animal Cognition, H.L. Roitblat, T.G. Bever, and H.S. Terrace (eds.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc.Google Scholar
Dasser, V. (1988), “A Social Concept in Java Monkeys” Animal Behaviour 36:225-230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dennett, D. E. (1976), The Intentional Stance. Cambridge, MA: MIT/Bradford Books.Google Scholar
Dugatkin, L. A. and Clark, A. B. (1992), “Of Monkeys, Mechanisms, and the Modular Mind.” Behavioral and Brain Sciences 15:153-154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunbar, R. I.M. (1993), “Neocortex Size as a Constraint on Group Size in Primates.” Journal of Human Evolution.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Essock-Vitale, S. and Seyfarth, R. M. (1987), “lntelligence and Social Cognition” in Primate societies, B.B. Smuts, D.L. Cheney, R.M. Seyfarth, R.W. Wrangham, and T.T. Struhsaker (eds.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Fodor, J. A. (1983), The Modularity of Mind. Cambridge: MIT/Bradford Books.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fodor, J. A. (1985), “Precis of The Modularity of Mind.” Behavioral and Brain Sciences 8:1-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gallistel, C. R. (1989), The Organization of Learning. Cambridge, MA: Bradford Bocks/MIT Press.Google Scholar
Garcia, J. and Koelling, R. A. (1966), “The Relation ofCue to Consequence in Avoidance Learning.” Psychonomic Science 4: 123-124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gelman, R. (1990), “First Principles Organize Attention and Learning about Relevant Data: Number and Animate-inanimate Distinctions as Examples.” Cognitive Science 14:79-106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gelman, R. and Gallistel, C. R. (1978), The Child's Understanding of Number. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Gelman, R. and Speike, E. (1981), “The Ddevelopment of Thoughts about Animate and Inanimate Objects.” in Social cognitive development, J.H. Aavel1 and L. Ross (eds.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gleitman, L. R., Gleitman, H., Landau, B., and Wanner, E. (1988), “Where Learning Begins: Initial Representations for Language Learning.” in Linguistics: The Cambridge survey, Vol. III. Language: Psychological and biological aspects, F. Newmeyer (ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gleitman, H. (1991), Psychology, 3rd edition. New York: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
Goodall, J. (1970), “Tool-using in Primates and Other Vertebrates.” in Advances in the Study of Behavior, vol. 3, D.S. Lehrman, R.A. Hinde, and E. Shaw (eds),. New York: Acadernic Press.Google Scholar
Goodall, J., Bandora, A., Bergmann, E., Busse, C., Matama, H., Mpongo, E., Pierce, A., and Riss, D. (1979), “Intercommunity Interactions in the Chimpanzee Population ofthe Gombe National Park.” in The great apes, D. Hamburg and E.R. McCown (eds.). Menlo Park: Benjamin/Cumrnings.Google Scholar
Harcourt, A. H. (1989), “Sociality and Competition in Primates and Non-primates.” in Comparative Socioecology: The Behavioural Ecology of Humansand Other Animals, V. Standen and R. Foley (eds.). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Harlow, H. F. (1949), “The Formation of Learning Sets.” Psychological Review 56:51-65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Humphrey, N. K. (1976), “The Social Function of Intellect” in Growing points in Ethology, P.P.G. Bateson and R.A. Hinde (eds.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Jackendoff, R. S. (1987), Consciousness and the Computational Mind. Cambridge: MIT/Bradford Books.Google Scholar
Jarvik, M. E. (1953), “Discrimination of Colored Food and Food Signs by Primates.” Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology 46:390-392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jarvik, M. E. (1956), “Simple Color Discrirnination in Chimpanzees: Effects of Varying Contiguity Between Cue and Incentive.” Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology 49:492-495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jolly, A. (1966), “Lemur Social Behavior and Primate Intelligence.” Science 153:501-506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kamil, A. C., Krebs, J. R., and Pulliam, H. R. (1987), Foraging Behavior. New York: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kamin, L. J. (1969), “Predictability, Surprise, Atte11tion and Conditioning.” in Punishment and Aversive Behavior, B.A. Campbel1 and R.M. Church (eds.). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.Google Scholar
Karmiloff-Smith, A. (1991), “Beyond Modularity: Innate Constraints and Developmental change.” in The epigenesis of mind: Essays on Biology and S. Cognition Carey and R. Gelman (eds.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc.Google Scholar
Keil, F. C. (1989), Concepts, Kinds, and Cognitive Development. Cambridge, MA: Bradford Books.Google Scholar
Keil, F. C. (1990a), “Constraints on Constraints: Surveying the Epigenetic Landscape.” Cognitive Science 14:135-168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keil, F. C. (1990b), “Constraints on the Acquisition and Representation of Knowledge.” in Cognitive psychology: An International Review, M.W. Eysenck (ed.). New York: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
Keil, F. C. (1991), “The Emergence ofTheoretical Beliefs as Constraints on Concepts.” in The epigenesis of Mind: Essays on Biology and Cognition, S. Carey and R. Gelman (eds.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc.Google Scholar
Killeen, P. R. (1985), “The Modularity of Behavior.” Behavioral and Brain Sciences 8:22-23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kohler, W. (1925/1959), The Mentality of Apes, 2d ed. New York: Viking.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krebs, J. R., Sherry, D. F., Healy, S. D., Perry, V. H., and Vaccarino, A. L. (1989), “Hippocampal Specialization of Food-storing Birds.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 86: 1388-1392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leslie, A. M. (1984), “Spatiotemporal Continuity and the Perception of Causality in Infants.” Perception 13:287-305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leslie, A. M. (1991), “The theory ofMind Impairment in Autism: Evidence for a Modular Mmechanism of Development?” in Natural theories of mind: Evolution, Development, and Simulation of Everyday Mind-reading, A. Whiten (ed.). Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Leslie, A. M. and Keeble, S. (1987), “Do Six-month-old Infants Perceive Causality?” Cognition 25:265-288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Massey, C. R. and Gelman, R. (1988), “Preschoolers’ Ability to Decide Whether Photographed Unfamiliar Objects Can Move Themselves.” Developmental Psychology 24:307-317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Michotte, A. (1963), The Perception ofCausality. New York:Basic Books.Google Scholar
Milton, K. (1981), “Distribution Patterns of Tropical Plant Food as an Evolutionary Stimulus to Primate Mental Development.” AmericanAnthropologist 83:534-548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milton, K. (1988), “Foraging Behaviour and the Evolution of Primate Intelligence.” in Machiavellian Intelligence: Social Expertise and the Evolution of Intellect in Monkeys, Apes, and Humans, R.W. Byrne and A. Whiten (eds.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Moses, L. J. and Flavell, J. H. (1990), “Inferring False Beliefs from Actionsand Reactions.” Child Development 61: 929-945.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murphy, G. L. and Medin, D. (1985), “The role of theories in conceptual coherence.” Psychological Review 92:289-316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newport, E. S. (1991), “Contrasting concepts of the critical period for language.” in The epigenesis of mimt: Essays on biology anti cognition, S. Carey and R. Ge!rnan (eds.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc.Google Scholar
Nishida, T. (1987), “Local traditions and cultural transmission.” in Primate societies, B.B. Smuts, D. L. Cheney, R. M. Seyfarth, R. W. Wrangham, and T.T. Struhsaker (eds.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press,Google Scholar
Oakes, L. M. and Cohen, L. B. (1990), “ Infant perception of a causal event.” Cognitive Development 5:193-207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Owren, M. J. (1990), “Acoustic classification of alarm calls by vervet monkeys (Cercopithecus aethiops), and humans (Homo sapiens),: I. Natural calls. Journal of Comparative Psyclwlogy 104:20-28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perner, J. (1991), Understamiing the representational mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Povinelli, D. J., Nelson, K. E., and Boysen, S. T. (1990) “Inferences about guessing and knowing by chirnpanzees (Pan troglodytes),.” Journal of Comparative Psychology 104:203-210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Premack, D. (1976), Intelligence in ape anti man. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc.Google Scholar
Premack, D. and Dasser, V. (1991), “Perceptual origins and conceptual evidence for theory of mind in apes and children.” Natural theories of mind: Evolution, development, anti simulation of everyday mind-reading, A. Whiten (ed.). Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Premack, D. and Woodruff, G. (1978), “Does the chimpanzee have a theory of mind?” Behavioral and Brain Sciences 1: 515-526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rescorla, R. A. (1967), “Pavlovian conditioning and its proper control procedures.” Psychological Review 74:71-80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rescorla, R. A. (1988), “Behavioral studies of Pavlovian conditioning.” Annual Review of Neuroscience 11:329-352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rescorla, R. A. and Wagner, A. R. (1972), “A theory of Pavlovian conditioning: Variations in the effectiveness of reinforcement and non-reinforcement.” in Classical comiitioning H,. A.H. Black and W.F. Prokasy (eds.). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.Google Scholar
Rozin, P. (1976), ‘The evolution of intelligence and access to the cognitive unconscious.” in Progress in psychology, vol 6, J.N. Sprague and A.N. Epstein (eds.). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Rozin, P. and Schull, J. (1988), “The adaptive-evolutionary point of view in experimental psychology.” in Handbook of experimental psychology: Motivation, R. Atkinson, R.J. Herrnstein, G. Lindsey, and R.D. Luce (eds.). New York: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
Schrier, A. M. (1984), “Learning How to Learn: The Significance and Current Status of Learning Set Formation.” Primates 25:95-102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seyfarth, R. M., Cheney, D. L., and Marler, P. (1980), “Vervet Monkey Alarm Calls: Semantic Communication in a Free-ranging Primate.” Animal Behaviour 28 :1070-1094.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shapiro, K. L., Jacobs, W. J., and Lolordo, V. M. (1980), “Stirnulus-reinforcer Interactions in Pavlovian Conditioning of Pigeons: Implications for Selective Associations.” Animal Learning and Behavior 8:586-594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shyan, M. R., Wright, A. A., Cook, R. G., and Jitsumori, M. (1987), “Acquisition of the Auditory Same/Different Task in a Rhesus Monkey.” Bulletin of the Psychonomics Society 25:1-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Speike, E. S. (1990), “Principles of Object Perception.” Cognitive Science 14:29-56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Speike, E. S. (1991), “Physical Knowledge in Infancy: Reflections on Piaget's Theory.” in The Epigenesis of Mind: Essays on Biology and Cognition, S. Carey and R. Gelman (eds.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc.Google Scholar
Stephens, D. W. and Krebs, J. R. (1986), Foraging Theory. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Visalberghi, E. (1992), “Is lack of Understanding of Cause-effect Relationships a Suitable Basis for Interpreting Monkeys’ Failures in Attribution?” Behavioral and Brain Sciences 15:169-170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Visalberghi, E. and Trinca, L. (1989), “Tool use in Capuchin Monkeys: Distinguishing Between Perforrning and Understanding.” Primates 30:511-521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wellman, H. M. and Gelman, S. A. (1992), “Cognitive Development: Foundational Theories of Core Domains.” Annual Review of Psychology 43:337-375.Google Scholar
Whiten, A. (ed.) (1991), Natural Theories of Mind: Evolution, Development, and Simulation of Everyday Mind-reading. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Whiten, A. and Byme, R. W. (1988), “Tactical Deception in Primates.” Behavioral and Brain Sciences 11 :233-273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodruff, G. and Premack, D. (1979), “Intentional Communication in the Chimpanzee: The Development of Deception.” Cognition 7:333-62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zoloth, S. R., Petersen, M. R., Beecher, M. D., Green, S., Marler, P., Moody, D.B., and Stebbins, W. (1979), “Species-specific Perceptual Processing of Vocal Sounds by Monkeys.” Science 204:870-72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar